Think about the ideal of democracy. Then, with reference to at least two example

/in /by

Think about the ideal of democracy. Then, with reference to at least two examples explain how and why a parliamentary system comes close to meeting this ideal. In your view, are these good enough reasons to move towards a parliamentary system of government? Explain.

The post Think about the ideal of democracy. Then, with reference to at least two example appeared first on homework handlers.

compose a nine-page dialogue in which Socrates engages in conversation with at l

/in /by

compose a nine-page dialogue in which Socrates engages in conversation with at least one other thinker studied in this course, to discuss a chosen theme from Karlowicz. Instructions are in Kreeft, Socratic Logic, pages 344-347 (also available online in a PDF). Other thinkers: Plato, Pythagoras, Epicurus, Aristotle, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius Socratic Dialogue Instructions: http://morec.com/socratic/socrates.pdf Grading criteria: http://morec.com/socratic/ Dialogue sample and dialogue format: https://chinatxt.sitehost.iu.edu/Thought/Euthyphro.pdf Example of a Socratic Dialogue: Plato’s Republic, Book I (see especially Discussion #3, pages 5-13): https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl201/modules/Philosophers/Plato/republic_book_one.pdf

The post compose a nine-page dialogue in which Socrates engages in conversation with at l appeared first on homework handlers.

I would like you to do a traditional literature review. These documents are help

/in /by

I would like you to do a traditional literature review. These documents are helpful so please review these documents. FAQ: Do I critique the methodology of all of my research articles? In the sources that I have posted re: tips for literature reviews, some of them focus on methodology/identifying issues with methods. This is more relevant if you are writing a research proposal or writing your undergraduate thesis – which as far as I know, most of you are not ?? So no, the goal of the literature review is not to deconstruct methodology; rather it is to highlight the state of knowledge in that area (i.e. with respect to the small collection of papers you have gathered). Some general description of procedure is necessary if plan on talking at length about particular articles. In order for the reader to understand the findings properly, I must know a little bit about how the study was conducted. This is a good example of what I mean by ‘contextualizing’ information. You want to prime the reader with sufficient (not overwhelming) detail about procedure and participant sample so that I understand how to interpret the finding(s) that you have/are about to write/written about. What is appropriate is that you summarize any concerns or shortcomings (methodologically or theoretically) after you’ve summarized the literature. This provides a natural and logical flow into future directions toward the end of your paper … In terms of what to report re: findings. Like the sample literature review that is posted, it is great to give me some information (e.g. 40% said this; the correlation was modest at .34); however, do not write about f-values, p-values, beta-values, confidence intervals, multilevel modeling, Cohen’s D, and other statistically technical terms in the literature review for this paper. Keep in mind it is a term paper, not for your dissertation. I hope this is helpful. Please email if you have further questions.

The post I would like you to do a traditional literature review. These documents are help appeared first on homework handlers.

For the assignment, you are to choose one of the articles below (they are availa

/in /by

For the assignment, you are to choose one of the articles below (they are available on Blackboard) and write a 4-7 page review of it. Your primary sources for the paper are the article and the Bible. You may use other sources if necessary, but web-sites are not to be used as sources. You should properly cite all quotations and provide a Works Cited page. Please use the Chicago-Turabian style of parenthetical references, and use proper spelling and punctuation.
Procedure:
Choose one of the articles below and read it.
Write a minimum four page (maximum 7 page) review of the article. Please include the following in your review:
Give the full bibliographic information for the article in the TEXT of the paper. {Note: This does not have to be in a specific format.}
Identify the target audience.
Identify the thesis of the article.
Summarize the development of the thesis.
Evaluate the article, including how the arguments supported the thesis, whether the thesis was proven, and the overall importance of the article.
Cite all quotations properly and include a Works Cited page.
Articles:
Bokovoy, David E. “שמעו והעידו בבית יעקב: Invoking the Council as Witnesses in Amos 3:13.” The Journal of Biblical Literature 127 (2008): 37-51.
Combs, Jason R. “A Ghost on the Water? Understanding an Absurdity in Mark 6:49-50.” The Journal of Biblical Literature 127 (2008): 345-358.
Corley, Jeremy. “A Numerical Structure in Sirach 44:1–50:24.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 69 (2007): 43-63.

The post For the assignment, you are to choose one of the articles below (they are availa appeared first on homework handlers.