Introduction conference biography

You have been invited to speak at a prestigious conference on how current trends and “hot topics” are affecting health care and human services for patients. In order to get the conference information ready for booklet printing the sponsors have asked for a brief biography.

Your bio should contain your current role in health care or human services (or other career field currently employed in) as well as any another career information the audience might need to have during your presentation. It has also been suggested that since you are close to concluding your studies for your Bachelors degree that you include the top 3 things you have learned throughout the HSA program. Furthermore, the sponsors have asked you to justify how you have already implemented these top 3 ideas/practices into your current working environment and why others should as well. Additionally the sponsors have asked that you include a professional headshot that will go next to your biography in the program booklet.

For this discussion please create a brief biography of yourself that would be included in the Conference Program. Your biography needs to be at least 150 words in length. A professional headshot usually accompanies the biography of the speaker. Please use a professional looking photo when posting your discussion biography.

The post Introduction conference biography first appeared on Submit Your Essays.


Introduction conference biography was first posted on November 6, 2020 at 12:49 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Thoughts?

Most of the time there is always more to the story. And the facts lie somewhere in between the stories you are presented.

How you you filter through them?  I have always surrounded myself with folks whose counsel I appreciate and bounce the stories off of them.

Bosses get tired of hearing the same excuse all the time.  Accept the responsibility vs trying to explain how you messed up or dropped the ball.  Mistakes happen (we all do them) but learn from them am move on.

Thoughts?

Unit 3: Assignment – Lion Essays

Unit 3: Assignment This Assignment requires you to use Excel only in Question 3. Follow all instructions carefully. Questions 1, 2, and 3 have specific requirements.  Make sure to use the Unit 3 Assignment template located in Course Resources to submit your answers. Question 1  Suppose a study reports that the average price for a gallon of self-serve regular unleaded gasoline is $3.16. You believe that the figure is higher in your area of the country. You decide to test this claim for your part of the United States by randomly calling gasoline stations. Your random survey of 25 stations produces the following prices (all in dollars). Assume gasoline prices for a region are normally distributed.  Did the data you obtained provide enough evidence to reject the claim? Use a 1% level of significance.  Make sure you clearly state both the null and the alternative hypotheses in full sentences. Following your calculations, clearly state the conclusion in the same manner (do not simply say “accept/reject null”) and explain how you arrived at this conclusion (based on which metrics).  3.27 3.3 3.16 3.15 3.11 3.05 3.54 3.25 3.05 3.11 3.13 Unit 3      [GB513: Business Analytics]  2 of 4  3.15 3.27 3.14 3.14 3.2 3.3 3.09 3.05 3.07 3.37 3.34 3.35 3.35 3.1  Question 2  Where do CFOs get their money news? According to Robert Half International, 47% get their money news from newspapers, 15% get it from communication/colleagues, 12% get it from television, 11% from the Internet, 9% from magazines, 5% from radio, and 1% do not know. Suppose a researcher wants to test these results. She randomly samples 76 CFOs and finds that 40 of them get their money news from newspapers. Does the test show enough evidence to reject the findings of Robert Half International? Use a = .05.  Make sure you clearly state both the null and the alternative hypotheses in full sentences. Following your calculations, clearly state the conclusion in the same manner (do not simply say “accept/reject null”) and explain how you arrived at this conclusion (based on which metrics). Question 3  To answer this question, use the Data Analysis Toolpack in Excel and select “t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances” from the list of available tools. Conduct a hypothesis test using this tool. Explain your answer (how you decided if men spend more or not) and include the output table. Unit 3      [GB513: Business Analytics]  3 of 4  Some studies have shown that in the United States, men spend more than women buying gifts and cards on Valentine’s Day. Suppose a researcher wants to test this hypothesis by randomly sampling men and women with comparable demographic characteristics from various large cities across the United States to be in a study. Each study participant is asked to keep a log beginning 1 month before Valentine’s Day and record all purchases made for Valentine’s Day during that 1-month period. The resulting data are shown below. Use these data and a 1% level of significance to test to determine if, on average, men actually do spend significantly more than women on Valentine’s Day. Assume that such spending is normally distributed in the population and that the population variances are equal. Make sure you clearly state both the null and the alternative hypotheses in full sentences. Include the output table; then, clearly state the conclusion in the same manner (do not simply say “accept/reject null”) and explain how you arrived at this conclusion (based on which metrics).  Men Women 107.48 125.98 143.61 59.32 90.19 96.35 125.53 80.62 70.79 77.6 83 84.34 129.63 75.21 154.22 68.48 93.8 65.84 111.25 126.11 78.6 82.54 89.35 123.5
.button {
background-color: #4CAF50;
border: none;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
display: inline-block;
font-size: 16px;
margin: 4px 2px;
cursor: pointer;
border-radius: 10px;
}

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


focused on the possible outcomes of contemporary scientific or technological advancements that might be morally or ethically questionable.

You will now have an opportunity to write your own fictional short story (57 pages), focused on the possible outcomes of contemporary scientific or technological advancements that might be morally or ethically questionable.

As you write, think about the narrative elements listed above. How can you invest your reader in your characters and plot? What contextual information does your audience need for the story to make sense? How can you build suspense, and what details are needed to make your reader feel like he or she is part of your story?

You will be turning in first a rough draft and then a final draft for this assignment. Submit your rough draft here to be reviewed by your instructor; he/she will return it to you with any comments and suggestions. You cannot begin working on your final draft until your rough draft has been reviewed and returned to you with feedback.

The following rubric will be used to grade your rough draft.

Fictional Narrative Assignment Rubric

3140 points

2130 points

1120 points

010 points

Length and Format

Story is 57 pages, formatted Times New Roman, 12 point font, with one inch margins, includes correct writing conventions, (spelling, complete sentences, correct punctuation, etc).

Plot

Author effectively uses elements of plot, such as exposition, conflict, rising action, climax, and resolution to engage the reader and has a conclusion that follows from and reflects on what is experienced, observed, or resolved over the course of the narrative.

Narrative Elements

Narrative techniques such as dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, plot lines, and development of characters and events are used effectively and accurately.

Science Fiction

Scientific or technological advancements and their moral or ethical implications are effectively explored and imagined.