A dead battery is charged by connecting it to the live battery of another car with jumper cables (see figure). (Take R = 1.26 and r = 0.) pic :…

A dead battery is charged by connecting it to the live battery of another car with jumper cables (see figure). (Take R = 1.26 Ωand r = 0.09 Ω.)

pic : http://www.webassign.net/sercp9/18-p-026-alt.gif

(a) Determine the current in the starter. (Enter your answer to at least one decimal place.)  A (b) Determine the current in the dead battery.  A

The post A dead battery is charged by connecting it to the live battery of another car with jumper cables (see figure). (Take R = 1.26 and r = 0.) pic :… appeared first on Nursing Essay Tutors.


A dead battery is charged by connecting it to the live battery of another car with jumper cables (see figure). (Take R = 1.26 and r = 0.) pic :… was first posted on November 10, 2020 at 2:56 am.
©2019 "nursingassignmenttutor". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at administrator@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


compare-contrast essay. about a problem solving decision

You will write a comparison-contrast essay about a problem-solving decision you had to make. Using the personal pronouns I, me, and we, you will describe the problem and how you chose to solve it by evaluating the benefits and disadvantages of multiple options.  The essay will include an introduction, at least three body paragraphs, and a conclusion.  Your introduction should include the thesis or controlling idea that you will discuss.

This essay will compare and contrast multiple options for problem-solving.  Therefore, you must choose between the alternating points or block style for comparing and contrasting.

What are the requirements?

Your essay should:

Solve a problem you experienced in school or work.  Remember, this is about one specific problem.  Do not write that you hated or loved your job because that is a generality about your feelings.  Instead, write about a specific problem, the different ways it could be solved, and why you chose a particular option instead of a different solution.

Have an engaging, exciting title and introduction. (Grab the reader!)
Have a clear focus throughout the essay.

Include details as you compare and contrast multiple options for solving the problem.

Include all of the important detailswho, what, where, when, and why.

Conclude with a summation of the essay and perhaps a question or idea that leaves the readers with something to consider if they experience a similar problem.

Get your audience’s attention in the beginning and set up multiple options to compare and contrast solutions to a problem you are solving in the essay. Structure your paragraphs with topic sentences and supporting details; link them together with transitions. Help your reader realize the significance of the problem by including sensory detail and descriptive language.  Highlight the benefits of your solution and the significance to you in the thesis statement and conclusion. Your essay should be 800-1,000 words (about three pages), typed in 12-point Times New Roman or Cambria font, double-spaced, with one-inch margins following proper MLA format.

Management help needed with the Motivation Theory

You are the director of human resources at a small regional transportation office, overseeing 12 employees.  The office is responsible for assessing the safety of the roads, bridges, sidewalks etc. in the region and proposing transportation projects.  The office has little control in what projects are funded (that’s done in Olympia) but the state won’t fund transportation projects without the office’s seal of approval, meaning all transportation projects in the region have to have the regional office’s support.  You oversee the offices 6 transportation engineers, 2 HR specialists and 4 secretaries.   One secretary is dedicated to the HR staff and the other 3 are shared among the 6 engineers.  As much of their work is conducted in their vehicles out in the field, one secretary for every two engineers should be enough.

The engineers consist of 5 young engineers (all male), the most senior of whom has been out of grad school 4 years.  All are expertly credentialed, are familiar with the most recent developments in transportation technology and rely on advanced statistical and computer modeling that improve efficiency  but they have no experience working with the public and tend to focus on objective factors like structural safety and engineering standards instead of the communities wants and needs.  The oldest engineer in the office, Bob, grew up in the region, started his career doing manual labor for the DOT during the summer and rose up through the ranks, eventually earning an engineering degree.  For many years Bob was the regional office so he’s made a ton of contacts in the community (contractors, the neighborhood associations, etc.) where they know, trust and like him.  The engineers work autonomously from each other, with the exception of sharing secretarial support, so problems between engineers are rare.

You return to work after a month off recuperating from knee surgery where you find a letter from 3 of the 5 engineers complaining that Bob is monopolizing one of the secretaries time.  They complain one secretary works for Bob, while the other 5 engineers have to share two secretaries.  You know that Bob isn’t wasting the secretary’s time as getting community and stakeholder input takes time and meetings (arranged and put together by the secretary) and he’s using secretarial support consistent with the agencies policies and mission.  But you also know the office has grown a lot the in the past few years and while the other engineers may not need their allotted secretary support right now, they may need it in the future and you want to solve this problem before it affects performance (people are complaining but there has been no affect on anyone’s performance yet).

While this is the first you’re hearing of the engineers having a problem with Bob, you already know that Bob is unhappy with the engineers, who he thinks are overly concerned with their own engineering standards and are ignoring, and in some cases, hostile to community involvement.  You learn at an engineers meeting held while you were away things got tense when Bob said “It’s not our job to tell the public what they can build” and someone replied “we are engineers! That is exactly what we do”.  Bob has a lot of support in the community, can communicate complicated engineering information in ways that the public, the city council, etc. can understand, has been with the agency since he was a teenager and has demonstrated a commitment to public service throughout his career.  You know that Bob is one of the most valuable employees in your office but you also know you can’t ignore the other engineers complaints.

1.) Using either Goal Setting Theory or Expectancy Theory to develop a plan for Bob to address the secretarial support problem.  Be thorough and specific.

2.) You’re concerned about the simmering tensions between Bob and the engineers in how they understand their jobs and their differing priorities.  Draw up a plan to address this problem using Theory X.

The post Management help needed with the Motivation Theory first appeared on https://nursingessayswriters.com.


Management help needed with the Motivation Theory was first posted on November 10, 2020 at 2:57 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Barriers to Collecting a Health History Journal

Barriers to Collecting a Health History-Journal # 2

What are the barriers you face to collecting a comprehensive health history so that you can give

culturally-competent
care?

Journal Grading Rubric

Unsatisfacotry Satisfactory Average Excellent Score Weight Final Score
1 2 3 4
Identifies importance of subject as it relates personally, clinically, and professionally. Identifies importance without reflection or examples. Minimal reflection without reference to personal, clinical, or profession. Reflection of subject to self, clinical, and professional importance with minimal integration of evidence based information. Thorough identification of the importance of the subject matter to the individual, clinical, and the profession. Supports this through personal experience and evidence-based information. Post consist of at least 300 words. 45% 0.00
Reflects on experiences and ties them to the course and unit outcomes appropriately. Provides short reflection, but no clear connection to outcomes. Provides short reflection, and there is a small connection to outcomes. Provides a well written reflection, and there is a clear connection to outcomes, but lacks clinical insight. Provides a well written reflection that is clearly connected to the outcomes and clinical insight is evident in the writing. 45% 0.00
Format/Style Major grammar errors. Several grammar errors. Few grammar errors No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. 10% 0.00
100% 0.00

The post Barriers to Collecting a Health History Journal first appeared on The Nursing Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”