|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
|
4
Good
94.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
80.0 %Content
|
|
|
30.0 % Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic
|
Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing.
|
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete.
|
Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague.
|
Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided.
|
Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale.
|
|
50.0 % Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described
|
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.
|
Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to teaching is missing.
|
Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching.
|
A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided.
|
Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers is provided.
|
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions
|
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
|
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
|
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
|
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
|
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
5.0 %Format
|
|
|
2.0 % Paper Format
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
|
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct.
|
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
|
|
100 % Total Weightage
|
|
