SPEECH ANALYSIS FROM A POLITICAL FIGURE FROM THE U.S.A.

analyze a speech in terms of Aristotles ethos, logos, and pathos …

****THE SPEECH  CAN BE ANY FROM A POLITICAL FIGURE FROM THE USA ******

——MAKE SURE YOU FOLLOW ALL OF THE BELLOW INSTRUCTIONS YOU CAN PICK THE SPEECH BUT I NEED TO APPROVE IT PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT SPEECH FIRST—–

Introduction: A one-paragraph introduction, ending with a clear thesis statement that previews the three main points you will discuss (e.g., I will analyze this speech in terms of Aristotles three key components of a speech:  ethos, logos, and pathos).

Body: Three subsequent paragraphs or sections, each devoted to developing one of your main points (e.g., paragraph on ethos, paragraph on logos, and paragraph on pathos). In each paragraph/section:
State one proof and define/explain what the proof is/means (e.g., Ethos refers to .).
Identify the degree to which each Aristotelian proof is present within the speech and support with all of the examples that you see in the speech (e.g., This speaker establishes a high degree of ethos by specific examples from speech.). This means you dont want to be general, but, rather, be specific in your examples (e.g., when discussing logos in a paper,  dont just say the speaker used supportspecify the exact support used in that speech).

Conclusion:  A one paragraph conclusion that reviews the main points and then evaluates the overall effectiveness of the speech in terms of the ethos, logos, and pathos. Does the speech achieve its communicative purpose or intent?  Why/why not?  Answer this question in terms of the three proofs. Then end by noting the key take aways you have gained from completing this analysis.

Please note:  By the end of this paper, you should clearly identify a minimum of 10 different ways in which the Aristotelian proofs (ethos, logos, and pathos) are established or created in the speech (10 total, not 10 for each proof). For each of the 10 examples that you provide, bold, italicize, or in some other way highlight it, so that you will be able to see easily (as will I) that you have, in fact, provided 10 examples.

Use of public speaking principles to inform the analysis clarity of thought (points are easily understandable), and quality of writing (proofread).  This should be a critical analysis that shows some depth and insight into the application of ethos, pathos, and logos in oratory, and displays your knowledge of the finer aspects of public speaking.

A complete text of the speech analyzed must be attached or included or the website where the speech may be seen is given.
View less

Audit Case (Write Up)-Accounting

Audit Case

You will need to use the PCAOB standards and SEC regulations to complete this assignment. You can access these resources on the PCAOB’s website: https://pcaobus.org/ (Links to an external site.) and the SEC’s website: https://sec.gov/ (Links to an external site.). A Google search may also help you locate relevant documents. You will also need to access the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). You can access it through the free basic view on the https://asc.fasb.org/ (Links to an external site.).

This case investigates the auditors of Corporate Resource Services, Inc. (CRS). The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed enforcement action against Mitchell Rubin, CPA, and Michael Bernstein, CPA for audits covering fiscal years ended 9/28/2012 and 12/28/2012 (Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4008 (December 21, 2018) and Crowe Horwath LLP, Joseph Macina, CPA, and Kevin Wydra, CPA for audits covering fiscal year end 1/3/2014 (Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 4007 (December 21, 2018). The enforcement releases are attached below.

Summary

First you should read through both enforcement releases and provide a summary of the events as presented by the SEC. It might be easiest to present the information as a timeline of events. Your summary should be in your own words and should identify the parties involved, the events that occurred, the standards/regulations that were violated, and the resulting sanctions/findings. This should be a brief overview of no more than 2 pages.

Patient Education Utilizing mHealth Application

Select ONE of the Health Conditions or Health Behaviors (except diabetes) for the focus of your assignment through the Healthy People 2030 link below:

https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives

Use the Milestone 1 template provided in the uploads to complete the assignment.
Write a patient scenario using the Required Assignment Topic.

Make sure to include a Healthy People 2030 Health Condition or Health Behavior in the scenario for a patient with a desire to maintain or achieve good health and prevent illness and who could benefit from an already developed and reliable mHealth app.
Choose a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article published within the last 5 years and related to the health condition or health behavior in your scenario. The Chamberlain Library is your best place to obtain this article. Cite this in APA 7th edition format in this section of the assignment.

-Describe in detail the plan for teaching this patient in the scenario.
-Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.
-Identify a mHealth app that could benefit the patient, considering the teaching/learning needs you identified.
-Describe the app including the mHealth app name, purpose, intended audience, mobile device(s) upon which it will operate, and where to download or obtain it. Add any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation.You will choose an already developed and reliable mHealth app to use in the education of your patient. Include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website in the area indicated on the template. 
Make sure to add a citation for this mHealth app in APA format. 

At the end of the Milestone 1 Template there is a References page where you will list your 2 references.  One will be the mHealth app reference and the other will be your scholarly article reference.

Epictetus claims that “external” things like our reputations are not “up to us.”

In Chapter 1, Epictetus claims that “external” things like our reputations, our jobs, our bodies, and our personal
possessions are not “up to us.” Using specific examples of your own, explain both how this can be true (or the
ways in which it is true), and also how it might not be true. After presenting your scenarios, decide whether you
agree with Epictetus on this issue.
After sharing your thoughts, read and respond to at least two of your classmate’s postings. For best results,
post first, then read and respond. In your responses, please gently correct any misperceptions you see, ask for
clarification, indicate what you found interesting or important, disagree (and, of course, explain why you
disagree), or raise a question for the writer. Don’t simply agree with what they have written.
Please continue to follow the Friday/Monday schedule we have been using for our blogging deadlines. Your
original post should be 150 words minimum, and your replies should be 100 words minimum.

Sample Solution

The post Epictetus claims that “external” things like our reputations are not “up to us.” appeared first on homework handlers.