For Which It Stands – Sean Hill

Guide to a Critical Analysis
Goal:
Evaluate one essay posted on our Canvas shell. Try to develop six paragraphs (an introduction, one refutation paragraph, three paragraphs to present your argument, and a conclusion). Evaluating means that you are the critic: Which rhetorical strategies does the author use successfully, and which are weak? Remember that an argument backs an opinion using evidence.

The structure of the essay:

I. Introduction One paragraph:
1) Open with an attention grabber

2) Give background or perhaps an illustrative example to show the significance of the subject or the nature of the controversy

3) Consider stating the conclusion of your argument (claim) here as the thesis of your essay, and it should mention the method/plan/reasons for such an evaluation

II. Refutation Usually one paragraph:
You must choose the best location for your argument. The key is to use good transitions between the refutation and the presentation of the argument.

If one paragraph . . .

1) Give a brief statement explaining who may have opposing view(s) and why, to make your reader aware that you have considered other points of view

2) but (transition and) explain why you have rejected those points for good reasons.

Some writers place the refutation paragraph almost last, just before the conclusion, or even interspersed at effective locations throughout the essay. If your stance is extremist/controversial, introduce counterarguments in the beginning of your paper on; a paragraph after the intro would be appropriate.

III. Presentation of your argument At least three paragraphs:
1) Paragraph Reason One

2) Paragraph Reason Two

3) Paragraph Reason Three

Throughout the body of your essay, to prove your thesis, build your case one point at a time, perhaps devoting one paragraph to the defense of each of your premises, or setting forth your evidence in (at least three) separate, meaningful categories (one category per paragraph). These three reasons confirm the thesis as subclaims. This means that you must have at least three body paragraphs for this part.

Please remember that each body paragraph should have a standard structure:

1) topic sentence argumentative and mentions which reason from thesis

2) introduction to an example (this may be a transition or explanation of context)

3) the actual example: a summary, paraphrase, or quotation, cited MLA style

4) argue what the reader should respond to regarding the example so that the reader absorbs your opinion rather than forming their own opinion

5) concluding sentence for paragraph argumentative and mentions which reason

IV. Conclusion One paragraph:
1) Remind the reader of the overall argument (thesis) using different wording

2) Summarize

3) Leave the reader with a memorable moment

After all your evidence has been presented and/or your premises defended, pull your whole argument together in the last paragraph by showing how the evidence you have presented provides sufficient grounds for accepting your conclusion. You may also add here some conventional device to finish your essay, such as a prediction, a new example, a reference to the example with which you began (now seen in a new light), etc.

Extra thoughts on an argumentative essay:
Without enough proof, a writer can sound judgmental but not logical, and vice versa, if a writer were to have overflowing logos, causing his or her voice to get lost, then the ethos would be weakened. Hopefully, your efforts throughout the semester have helped you balance this already. With evaluative and argumentative work, sometimes providing proof can cause tonal shifts if the writer is not careful. Be sure to reiterate your stance by using evaluative words throughout your sentences to control the tone.

Use transitions.

Pediatric Cardiomyopathy

Submit: Annotated Bibliography Assignment

Instructions:

Before beginning the outline of your research paper, which you will do in Module 5, you will complete an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to compile research sources in one location and provide you with quick access to the information contained in each source.

Content/Subject: Your annotated bibliography will consist of the sources that you have deemed relevant to your topic.  While you may encounter sources that are not relevant or do not fit the scope of your project while researching, for the purposes of this assignment, you will only include the ones that you find useful and relevant.

For this assignment, you will be writing evaluative annotations rather than summative annotations. In a summative evaluation, the writer simply summarizes the text. In an evaluative annotation, the writer critically evaluates the source for relevance. The writer also evaluates for quantity of valid information the source has for the writers project.

Cite the source in proper MLA format. The citations are in alphabetical order by author just as in an MLA Works Cited page.
Follow with a brief annotation that summarizes the source (approx. 2-3 sentences). Do not copy and paste the abstract. All of the annotations should be in your own words.
In 3-5 sentences, evaluate the source for relevancy to your paper, compare it to other sources you have found, explain the authors expertise and any bias they might have, identify the strengths and weaknesses of the source, and identify any relevant conclusions the author made.
Constraints:  The annotated bibliography is a rigid genre.  Your citations must adhere to MLA format.  This will be one of the central components of the grade for this assignment.  Failure to follow MLA format exactly will harm your grade.

The annotations for each source should follow an academic style.  This means that you must construct, with elevated and sophisticated language, correct grammatical sentences.

To view an example of an annotated bibliography, look through the Columbia College MLA Citation Guide (8th Edition).

Specific guidelines to follow when completing this assignment are:

6 sources located using the library databases.
Adherence to MLA format for all citations.
Sources in alphabetical order according to author.
Thoughtful and complete annotations of 100-150 words.
Correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander Reflection Paper

write a critical reflection paper addressing racism, oppression, and racial trauma as it intersects with the mental health and well-being of diverse population groups. As a critical reflection, it is expected that you demonstrate the following:

Evidence of engagement with and understanding of the substance of the book
Your own personal engagement with the content
Your ability to integrate that content professionally with your role as a future MSW-prepared social worker addressing racial trauma and the mental health needs of racially and culturally diverse groups

Torts against Liability

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3643538/Two-year-old-boy-snatched-alligator-Disney-TEN-FEET-shore-reptile-struck-lifeguard-reveals.html (Links to an external site.)

https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/15/us/alligator-attacks-child-disney-florida/index.html (Links to an external site.)

Instructions:  In your assigned pairs, complete this case.  For this Case, person A is the attorney for the plaintiff, person B is the attorney for the defense.  You will switch roles in the next Decide the Dispute Discussion Board. 

Based on the case information and in consideration of the posed questions, complete an opening statement that you would present to the court on behalf of your client (minimum 300 words, maximum 700 words).

Do you believe that the family of the child has a viable civil lawsuit against Disney? 

Identify the tort theories of liability and categories of damages that the family might pursue in this case, and discuss each of them, making sure to identify the elements of your causes of action, and claim for damages.

Are there any legal defenses that Disney is able to use in order to mitigate or diminish any possible award of damages?  Likewise, are there any legal doctrines that make it easier for the family to obtain money damages against Disney. 

In providing your initial statement, please remember that you are an advocate for either the family and Disney, and must state whether or not your client will be successful.    In your rebuttal to your partner, you must refute why the opposing party is not deserving of victory. 

Post your statement here for grading, and discussion.  Then find your partner’s original post and respond it it (minimum of two posts).  Your submission  will be graded based on the Decide the Dispute Participation Rubric.

To access this rubric, click the gear icon and choose “show rubric.”