. Specify the aggregate level for study (e.g., group, population group, or organization). Identify and provide a general orientation to the aggregate (e.g., characteristics of the aggregate system, supra system, and subsystems). Include the reasons for selecting this aggregate

/in /by

I. Assessment

A. Specify the aggregate level for study (e.g., group, population group, or organization). Identify and provide a general orientation to the aggregate (e.g., characteristics of the aggregate system, supra system, and subsystems). Include the reasons for selecting this aggregate

B. Describe specific characteristics of the aggregate.

1. Sociodemographic characteristics: Including age, sex, race or ethnic group, religion, educational background and level, occupation, income, and marital status.

2. Health status: Work or school attendance, disease categories, mortality, health care use, and population growth and population pressure measurements (e.g., rates of birth and death, divorce, unemployment, and drug and alcohol abuse). Select indicators appropriate for the chosen aggregate.

C. Provide relevant information from the literature review, especially in terms of the characteristics, problems, or needs within this type of aggregate. Compare the health status of the aggregate with similar aggregates, the community, the state, and the nation.

D. Identify the specific aggregate’s health problems and needs based on comparative data collection analysis and interpretation and literature review. Include input from clients regarding their need perceptions. Give priorities to health problems and needs, and indicate how to determine these priorities.

II. Planning

A. Select one health problem or need, and identify the ultimate goal of intervention. Identify specific, measurable objectives as mutually agreed upon by the student and aggregate.

B. Describe the alternative interventions that are necessary to accomplish the objectives.

C, Use preventive approach if applicable ( primary, secondary and tertiary)

III. Intervention

A. Implement at least one level of planned intervention when possible.

B. If intervention was not implemented, provide reasons.

C. Levels of prevention if its applicable

IV. Evaluation

A. Evaluate the plan, objectives, and outcomes of the intervention(s). Include the aggregate’s evaluation of the project. Evaluation should consider the process, product, appropriateness, and effectiveness.

B. Make recommendations for further action based on the evaluation, and communicate these to the appropriate individuals or system levels. Discuss implications for community health nursing.

The post . Specify the aggregate level for study (e.g., group, population group, or organization). Identify and provide a general orientation to the aggregate (e.g., characteristics of the aggregate system, supra system, and subsystems). Include the reasons for selecting this aggregate appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Explore the influence of Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring on your future role as an APN. The student will explore the concepts and caritas processes from the Theory of Human Caring and present how these concepts may impact their future APN role. 

/in /by

Week 7, Day 7 | CLO: 5 | Grade Category: Assignments

Assignment Prompt

Explore the influence of Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring on your future role as an APN. The student will explore the concepts and caritas processes from the Theory of Human Caring and present how these concepts may impact their future APN role.

Directions:

1. The student will create a PowerPoint and include speaker notes that may be added to the speaker note section on each slide.

2. The presentation should be limited to no more than 10 slides. See suggested slides below.

3. If you are unfamiliar with Dr. Watson’s theory see this overview.

A suggested outline for the presentation may include the following slides:

Slide 1 – Introduction to yourself and future planned APN role and practice

Slide 2 – Previous experience with Watson’s Theory of Human Caring

Slide 3 – Core Concepts of the Theory Applicable to the APN role

Slide 4 – Core Concepts of the Theory Applicable to the APN role (as needed)

Slide 5 – Five Carative Factors or Caritas Processes You Plan to Use in the APN Role

Slide 6 – Five Carative Factors or Caritas Processes You Plan to Use in the APN Role (as needed)

Slide 7 – What Does the Theory of Human Caring Mean to You

Slide 8 – APN Implications of Theory of Human Caring

Slide 9 – Summary/Main Points

Slide 10 – Reference

 

Expectations

· Due: Sunday, 11:59 pm PT

· Format: PPT Presentation with Speaker Notes

· Length: 10 Slides, maximum

· Save the file with Student First Name_Last Name_Watson_Presentation

See USU NUR Presentation Rubric for additional details and point weighting.

The post Explore the influence of Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring on your future role as an APN. The student will explore the concepts and caritas processes from the Theory of Human Caring and present how these concepts may impact their future APN role.  appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Develop a hypothetical health promotion plan, 2–3 pages in length, addressing a specific health concern for an individual or a group living in the community that you identified from the topic list provided. A hypothetical nonprofit group is highly recommended.

/in /by

Develop a hypothetical health promotion plan, 2–3 pages in length, addressing a specific health concern for an individual or a group living in the community that you identified from the topic list provided. A hypothetical nonprofit group is highly recommended.

  • Bullying.
  • Home safety.
  • Fall prevention.
  • Immunizations.
  • Tobacco use (vaping, e-cigarettes, hookah, chewing tobacco, or smoking) cessation.

All assignments in the course are based upon hypothetical individuals or groups.

For this assignment, you will plan for and enlist the participation of a hypothetical individual or group in a clinical learning activity based on a health promotion plan, addressing a particular health concern affecting these members of your community.

Professional Context

The first step in any effective project or clinical patient encounter is planning. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to plan a clinical learning experience focused on health promotion associated with a specific community health concern. Such a plan defines the critical elements of who, what, when, where, and why that establish the foundation for an effective clinical learning experience for the participants. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of how to plan and negotiate individual or group participation.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze health risks and health care needs among distinct populations.
    • Analyze a community health concern that is the focus of a health promotion plan.
  • Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.
    • Explain why a health concern is important for health promotion within a specific population.
    • Establish agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with participants.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.
    • Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Note: Assessment 1 must be completed first before you are able to submit Assessment 4.

Preparation

The first step in any effective project or clinical patient encounter is planning. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to plan a hypothetical clinical learning experience focused on health promotion associated with a specific community health concern. Such a plan defines the critical elements of who, what, when, where, and why that establish the foundation for an effective clinical learning experience for the participants. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of how to plan and negotiate individual or group participation.

You will need to satisfactorily pass Assessment 1 (Health Promotion Plan) before working on your last assignment (Assessment 4).

To prepare for the assessment, consider various health concerns that you would like to be the focus of your plan from the topic list provided, the populations potentially affected by that concern, and hypothetical individuals or groups living in the community. Then, investigate your chosen concern and best practices for health improvement, based on supporting evidence.

As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Effective Interpersonal Communications activity. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.

Please choose one of the topics below:

  • Bullying.
  • Home safety.
  • Fall prevention.
  • Immunizations.
  • Tobacco use (vaping, e-cigarettes, hookah, chewing tobacco, or smoking) cessation.

In addition, you are encouraged to:

  • Complete the Vila Health: Effective Interpersonal Communications simulation.
  • Review the health promotion plan assessment and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
  • Review the MacLeod article, “Making SMART Goals Smarter.”

The post Develop a hypothetical health promotion plan, 2–3 pages in length, addressing a specific health concern for an individual or a group living in the community that you identified from the topic list provided. A hypothetical nonprofit group is highly recommended. appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Capstone Project – Presentation and Evaluation Instructions

/in /by

N4685 Capstone

 

 

 

 

Module 5: Capstone Project – Presentation and Evaluation Instructions

 

 

 

NOTE: You will create two new electronic files for this assignment instead of typing directly into this document.

 

Overview: Capstone Project – Presentation and Evaluation

 

Your project should represent high-quality work – something you would expect to see in a professional setting. Perhaps your employer will be interested in facilitating its use in a real-life situation!

 

You will upload your PowerPoint for grading. You will also upload the forms or documents you would use for evaluation (two evaluation tools will be created) of your information dissemination. These might be in the form of informal observation records and/or formal tests or questionnaires. (This evaluation portion will be submitted as one Word document. See below for all that must be included). There is a separate portal for each portion of the assignment in Blackboard.

 

Objectives

 

Design evaluation tools to accompany your project.

 

Locate peer-reviewed articles discussing evidence-based nursing practice. 

 

Design evaluation tools to accompany your project. 

 

Rubric – Project Presentation

 

 

 

Criteria

  

Target

  

Acceptable

  

Unacceptable
Accurate (70 Points)

 Accurate presentation of content with differentiation

between facts and opinions; well organized with in text citations for useful sources (at least 9). 10-15 content slides with comprehensive speaker notes.

(70 Points)

 Essential information is included but speaker notes and/or slides lack depth and need additional content and/ or lacking in text citations for useful sources. Outside the required 10-15 content slides.

 

(40 Points)

 

 

 

 

 Errors in content specific information or lack of references prohibit use in professional setting

 

(0 Points)
Required References

(10 Points)

 All 9 references included

(10 points)

   Less than 9 required references

(0 points)
Attractive (10 Points)

 

 Professional, appropriate for setting with no spelling or grammar errors; designed with appropriate use of color, graphics, and fonts. Up to 5 points will be deducted if images used are not cited. No APA errors in references.

(10 Points)

 One or more spelling or grammar errors; design missing graphics and/ or inappropriate fonts. Up to 5 points will be deducted if images used are not cited. 1-2 APA errors in references.

 

(5 Points)

 Design or grammar/spelling errors prohibit reading or understanding content and if images used are not cited. 3 or more APA errors in references.

 

(0 Points)
Appropriate (10 Points)

 

 Developmentally and age appropriate for audience; within the appropriate time frame (clock time 20-30 minutes)

(10 Points)

 

 

 Not Developmentally and/ or age appropriate for entire target audience and/ or inappropriate time frame for content delivery

(5 Points)

 Project inappropriate for profession use as not developmentally or age appropriate for audience; and / or project length is too short or too long

 

(0 Points)

 

 

 

Rubric – Project Evaluation

 

 

 

Task

  

Target

  

Acceptable

  

Unacceptable
Evaluation (50 Points)

 

 Appropriate evaluation tool(s) to assess both quality of presentation and achievement of outcomes.

(50 Points)

 Appropriate evaluation tool(s) to assess either quality of presentation or achievement of outcomes.

(25 Points)

 Evaluation tool(s) inadequate for effective assessment of both components

 

(0 Points)
Professional (10 Points)

 

 Professional format without spelling errors (this includes evaluation forms)

(10 Points)

 Format with spelling and/ grammar errors and/ or missing evaluation forms

(5 Points)

 Errors in formatting and/ or spelling and grammar prohibit use in professional setting present

(0 Points)
Grid (20 points)

 

 Grid is present, complete, with accurate SMART objectives; and APA references specific to the topic

(20 points)

 Contains errors, is inaccurate, or missing required information with missing grid

(10 points)

 Grid not included in submission

(0 points)
APA Format (20 points) Title page follows

UTA CON format and reference page listed in APA format with a

minimum of nine peer reviewed sources

 

(20 Points)

 Errors in Title page and/ or Reference page including inaccurate information and APA errors

(1-10 Points)

 Title page includes errors and referenceswith inaccurate format;

(0 Points)

 

 

 

Instructions

You will create your project’s presentation and evaluation tools as an electronic files.

 

PowerPoint Portion of Assignment (Assignment 2):

 

Presentation

You will submit a Power Point presentation containing a title slide, 10-15 slides each with comprehensive content demonstrating use of your peer-reviewed sources, and reference slides. Remember to include a source for each image or graphic included on the slides; this is easiest done directly on the slide under or next to the image. Your “talking points” are considered speaker notes and should contain 20-30 minutes of “talk time.” Information read directly from the slide should be included in the speaker notes. We recommend you time yourself while reading your speaker notes to determine if your presentation is within the 20-30 minutes for content. Your speaker notes should be written exactly as you would be speaking to your audience. You do need to include citations in your speaker notes. Be sure to include all of your references on the reference slide(s).

 

Evaluation Portion of Project (Assignment 3):

(This will be one document with all of the following included in that document)

 

Title Page

Create a title page according to the standard for the UTA College of Nursing.

 

Evaluation (2 Tools are required – one for quality and one for content)

You may create a new Word document for most of the types of evaluation tools you would use, such as tests, questionnaires, charts for observations notes, etc. Create two evaluation tools. Include all in the same file as separate pages with clear headings and instructions designating the use of each tool.

 

Other types of evaluation tools you might use are databases or spreadsheets. It is important that you design such tools so that you need only to upload and submit one file, though, so if you use a combination of Word documents and spreadsheets, copy/paste the contents of the spreadsheets into the Word document to create a single file.

 

Evaluation form requirements: You must submit two evaluation forms. One form will address evaluation of content (example: a post-test or survey, audit form) and one form will address quality (rate the presentation, speaker, and environment; consider using a Likert scale). Remember you will create both forms for this assignment. Do not copy forms from other sources. Include the time, place, and who you presented presentation. Also, discussion on the methods you used to evaluate your project. Include why the method, how you will use the results, and plans for improvement.

 

Grid

You will include the full completed grid from Module 3. Please be sure to make any needed changes based on feedback from your coach.

 

Evaluation Paragraph

You must include at least a paragraph (minimum 100 words) to discuss the methods to evaluate your Project. Include why the method you have chosen to evaluate the project is appropriate. Include in your paragraph how will you will take results from the evaluation and change or improve the presentation.

 

Reference Page

Create a formal reference page including all of your nine (or more) references from your project. Please be sure to use formal APA format. Refer to your APA manual for any questions.

 

 

JB 2020

The post Capstone Project – Presentation and Evaluation Instructions appeared first on Infinite Essays.