Community-Based Participatory Care to Combat Veterans

Running head: HEALTH PROMOTION 1

 

 

HEALTH PROMOTION 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community-Based Participatory Care to Combat Veterans

Student’s name

Institution affiliation

 

 

 

Combat veterans are a vulnerable group that serves the military in combat zones. This kind of group experiences a lot of challenges when serving, including mental health issues. Even after their services and after returning to their homes, they experience a lot of problems, such as struggling to meet their needs (Westphal& Convoy, 2015). When in service, it means that you are separated from family members, which is often stressful. Mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is caused by stress. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is an approach used to conduct research involving members of the community. The CBPR project can help identify some of the problems faced by this group. This paper discusses the cons and pros of implementing a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project with combat veterans.

Through the implementation of the Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project, the veteran group can primarily benefit because most healthcare practitioners are willing to collaborate. Nurses who initiate and implement health promotion plans try to work within the cultural context with the involved vulnerable group (Johnson &Koocher, 2017). The practitioners try much to develop and work out plans to engage the combat veterans. Though most of these veterans may seem uninterested, healthcare personnel can understand, recognize, and assess this vulnerable group’s importance, thus instigating health promotion plans and services also aimed to support military family wellbeing.

The CBPR health project is aimed at collecting research to improve the lives of different vulnerable groups. An advantage of this research project includes exploring perceptions as well as overall knowledge from the combat veterans. CBPR joins with the community to make a comprehensive research of a vulnerable group, to minimize disparities. As stated above, this group is exposed to a lot of health problems that need attention. With the American generation influenced and defined by military war, more combat veterans qualify for VHA, but fewer are enrolled (Johnson &Koocher, 2017). Healthcare practitioners have no straight impact on combat veterans’ maintenance and care. The purpose of the health promotion plan is to address the needs of this vulnerable group because it’s a fact that half of their lives are usually at risk.

Flexibility and awareness are some of the cons of implementing CBPR. As their health lives include more downs than ups, it’s better to know the limits of combat veterans and self-awareness. Some of the things that are likely to make a combat veteran not wanting to participate in this kind of project are the fact that many of them suffer from physical disabilities, like being on a wheelchair due to war injuries, while others are experiencing brain injuries, sprains and strains and so on (Westphal& Convoy, 2015).

Ethical issues can serve as barriers, or cons of implementing the CBPR project. Reason being that combat veterans are mindful of ethical implications. Confidentiality is a factor that this group doesn’t want to endanger, so they stay tight and hold up information. Combat veterans’ ethical practices (personal and professional) are liable on actual submission of private and cultural scruples as well as professional rules (Oster et al. 2019). They are not allowed to share any information outside their job areas, so implementing the health promotion plan to people who often and hardly share information based on their workplaces is hard. Culture can also serve as a con because not every person or combat veteran exhibits cultural beliefs and behavior characteristics.

 

 

References

Johnson, W. B., &Koocher, G. P. (2017). Ethical issues in the treatment of suicidal military personnel and veterans. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-30847-011

Oster, C., Lawn, S., & Waddell, E. (2019). Delivering services to the families of Veterans of current conflicts: a rapid review of outcomes for Veterans. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health5(2), 159-175. Retrieved from https://jmvfh.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/jmvfh.2018-0011

Westphal, R., & Convoy, S. (2015). Military culture implications for mental health and nursing care. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing20(1), 47-54. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b7da/7677a4a05cccf93995e2f704a1263a0c2af8.pdf

The post Community-Based Participatory Care to Combat Veterans appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Florida laws around advance directives are found in chapter 765 of Florida Statutes and split into three types:

1

Running head: ADVANCED DIRECTIVE VS. POLST

ADVANCED DIRECTIVE VS. POLST

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Directive vs. POLST

Jodi Turco, RN

December 2, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florida laws around advance directives are found in chapter 765 of Florida Statutes and split into three types: living wills, health care surrogate designation and anatomical donations. Each can be completed separately, but that would be redundant. The definition according to Florida Statutes is, “Advance directive” means a witnessed written document or oral statement in which instructions are given by a principal or in which the principal’s desires are expressed concerning any aspect of the principal’s health care or health information, and includes, but is not limited to, the designation of a health care surrogate, a living will, or an anatomical gift made pursuant to part V of this chapter” (2018). I obtained a copy of an advance directive form from the registration department of the facility that I work in and filled it out. It was straight forward and vague in that it says, “I direct that life-prolonging procedures be withheld or withdrawn when the application of such procedures would serve only to prolong artificially the process of dying” in the living will section and goes on to designate a surrogate. The second page is the Designation of Health Care Surrogate which states, “I fully understand that this designation will permit my designee to make health care decisions and to provide, withhold, or withdraw consent on my behalf”. It further designates a second surrogate as an alternate. The final page is the Uniform Donor Form which indicates whether or not a person wants to donate their organs or tissues for donation to others who need it or for research purposes. All of the forms require witnesses to be put into effect, but the Living Will and Health Care Surrogate forms require witnesses that are not blood related or the spouse of the person. To comply with Florida and Federal Laws, there are accompanying pages that explain the compliance requirement to provide a copy of a blank advance directive to each patient but ensure them that their care is not dependent upon the completion of the forms. Also attached are explanations and/or limitations of each. Of note is that there is a separate form needed if a patient wishes to not be resuscitated from a cardiac arrest. That form is a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) and must be completed by a physician. There were some odd feelings stirred up in me while I filled out the forms. The Living Will is tough to do because it makes you think about the end of your life, which is extremely uncomfortable to think about. It also asks you to think of the people that you’d trust to uphold your wishes in the event that you’re incapacitated. I couldn’t help but laugh at the fact that I struggled to choose two people in my life that I’d trust with those choices, but I think that maybe that is because no one in my family has a medical background to understand the processes of diseases or death to ask the questions that you or I would. It also made me thankful that my father had a living will in place when he passed away. I remember being comforted by the fact that we knew removing life-support was what he would have wanted. The organ donation form is a no-brainer for me, as I have been a donor since I was old enough to make the decision for myself. I have had the discussion with my family that I would like to have my body donated to those in need or to science to provide education to the next generation of medical professionals.

Meyers et al. state, “The Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form provides choices about end-of-life care and gives these choices the power of physician orders” (2004). Florida does not have a statewide POLST program, but if a person is facing a serious illness they can inquire with their doctor or treating medical facility about completing one. A POLST form differs from a DNRO in that it expands upon life-sustaining measures such as feeding tubes and hydration. It is meant to be used in conjunction with, not as a substitute for a Living Will and is also a part of a patient’s medical record that can be transferred from facility to facility to ensure continuity of care.

I work in an emergency department where lifesaving interventions are an everyday occurrence. The term “a good death” was coined by the Institute of Medicine with the meaning “one that is free from avoidable distress and suffering, for patients, family, and caregivers; in general accord with the patients’ and families’ wishes; and reasonably consistent with clinical, cultural, and ethical standards.” The importance of understanding end-of-life documents is critical to my practice. The POLST form is one that my state does not provide, but I believe would be an important adjunct to the living will now that I see how vague it really is. The POLST is most appropriate for patients that have serious illnesses as it helps loved ones to understand the details of a patient’s wishes. It makes communication amongst the varying disciplines more seamless. An advance directive is composed of two parts (or three in Florida): an advance directive, the designation of a health care surrogate, and an option to donate organs. A living will discusses the preferences of a patient to whether or not they want to receive pain medication, antibiotics, food or water at the end of life. It differs from the POLST form because it is filled out in a hypothetical scope. It is also not legally binding like an advance directive is. End-of-life decisions are not comfortable to make by any means, but this assignment brings to light the importance of these documents. Having conversations with our patients about these forms and being able to communicate the reasons for them is a vital part of a nursing career. They can also put patients at ease knowing that their loved ones will not have to make tough decisions in the event that they become incapacitated. They also help start a dialogue with patients and families about end-of-life wishes.

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

(n.d.). Chapter 765 – 2018 Florida Statutes – The Florida Senate. Retrieved December 4, 2019a,

from https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/Chapter765/All

 

Kellogg, E. (2017). Understanding Advance Care Documents: What the Nurse Advocate Needs

to Know. Journal of Emergency Nursing43(5), 400–405. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from 10.1016/j.jen.2016.12.001

 

Meyers, J. L., Moore, C., McGrory, A., Sparr, J., & Ahern, M. (2004). PHYSICIAN ORDERS

for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form: Honoring End-of-Life Directives for Nursing Home Residents. J Gerontol Nurs30(9), 37–46. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from 10.3928/0098-9134-20040901-08

The post Florida laws around advance directives are found in chapter 765 of Florida Statutes and split into three types: appeared first on Infinite Essays.

A4 Budget Development

A3 Estimated Expenses

ESTIMATED EXPENSES
This worksheet presents the estimated expenses for the development, launch, and maintenance for the Heathway’s clinic.

A4 Budget Development

BUDGET DEVELOPMENT
This worksheet presents the budget development for Heathway’s clinic.

A5 Ratio Analysis

RATIO ANALYSIS
This worksheet presents the ration analysis for Heathway’s clinic.

A6 Financial Statement Analysis

FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
This worksheet presents the financial statement analysis for Heathway’s clinic.

The post A4 Budget Development appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Evidence level and quality rating:

Evidence level and quality rating:

 

 

 

Article title: Number:
Author(s): Publication date:
Journal:
Setting: Sample (composition and size):
Does this evidence address my EBP question?

Yes

No- Do not proceed with appraisal of this evidence

 

· Clinical Practice Guidelines LEVEL IV

Systematically developed recommendations from nationally recognized experts based on research evidence or expert consensus panel

· Consensus or Position Statement LEVEL IV

Systematically developed recommendations, based on research and nationally recognized expert opinion, that guide members of a professional organization in decision-making for an issue of concern

· Are the types of evidence included identified? · Yes · No
· Were appropriate stakeholders involved in the development of recommendations? · Yes · No
· Are groups to which recommendations apply and do not apply clearly stated? · Yes · No
· Have potential biases been eliminated? · Yes · No
· Does each recommendation have an identified level of evidence stated? · Yes · No
· Are recommendations clear? · Yes · No
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool

 

 

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix F

Non-Research Evidence Appraisal

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

· Literature review LEVEL V

Summary of selected published literature including scientific and nonscientific such as reports of organizational experience and opinions of experts

· Integrative review LEVEL V

Summary of research evidence and theoretical literature; analyzes, compares themes, notes gaps in the selected literature

· Is subject matter to be reviewed clearly stated? · Yes · No
· Is literature relevant and up-to-date (most sources are within the past five years or classic)? · Yes · No
· Of the literature reviewed, is there a meaningful analysis of the conclusions across the articles included in the review? · Yes · No
· Are gaps in the literature identified? · Yes · No
· Are recommendations made for future practice or study? · Yes · No
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

 

 

· Expert opinion LEVEL V

Opinion of one or more individuals based on clinical expertise

· Has the individual published or presented on the topic? · Yes · No
· Is the author’s opinion based on scientific evidence? · Yes · No
· Is the author’s opinion clearly stated? · Yes · No
· Are potential biases acknowledged? · Yes · No
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

 

 

Organizational Experience

· Quality improvement LEVEL V

Cyclical method to examine workflows, processes, or systems with a specific organization

· Financial evaluation LEVEL V

Economic evaluation that applies analytic techniques to identify, measure, and compare the cost and outcomes of two or more alternative programs or interventions

· Program evaluation LEVEL V

Systematic assessment of the processes and/or outcomes of a program; can involve both quaNtitative and quaLitative methods

Setting: Sample Size/Composition:
· Was the aim of the project clearly stated? · Yes · No  
· Was the method fully described? · Yes · No  
· Were process or outcome measures identified? · Yes · No  
· Were results fully described? · Yes · No  
· Was interpretation clear and appropriate? · Yes · No  
· Are components of cost/benefit or cost effectiveness analysis described? · Yes · No · N/A
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

· Case report LEVEL V

In-depth look at a person or group or another social unit

· Is the purpose of the case report clearly stated? · Yes · No
· Is the case report clearly presented? · Yes · No
· Are the findings of the case report supported by relevant theory or research? · Yes · No
· Are the recommendations clearly stated and linked to the findings? · Yes · No
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Complete the corresponding quality rating.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community standard, clinician experience, or consumer preference LEVEL V

· Community standard: Current practice for comparable settings in the community

· Clinician experience: Knowledge gained through practice experience

· Consumer preference: Knowledge gained through life experience

Information Source(s) Number of Sources
· Source of information has credible experience · Yes · No · N/A
· Opinions are clearly stated · Yes · No · N/A
· Evidence obtained is consistent · Yes · No · N/A
Findings That Help You Answer the EBP Question
Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

 

 

 

Quality Rating for Clinical Practice Guidelines, Consensus, or Position Statements (Level IV)
A High quality

Material officially sponsored by a professional, public, or private organization or a government agency; documentation of a systematic literature search strategy; consistent results with sufficient numbers of well-designed studies; criteria-based evaluation of overall scientific strength and quality of included studies and definitive conclusions; national expertise clearly evident; developed or revised within the past five years.

B Good quality

Material officially sponsored by a professional, public, or private organization or a government agency; reasonably thorough and appropriate systematic literature search strategy; reasonably consistent results, sufficient numbers of well-designed studies; evaluation of strengths and limitations of included studies with fairly definitive conclusions; national expertise clearly evident; developed or revised within the past five years.

C Low quality or major flaw

Material not sponsored by an official organization or agency; undefined, poorly defined, or limited literature search strategy; no evaluation of strengths and limitations of included studies; insufficient evidence with inconsistent results; conclusions cannot be drawn; not revised within the past five years.

Quality Rating for Organizational Experience (Level V)
A High quality

Clear aims and objectives; consistent results across multiple settings; formal quality improvement or financial evaluation methods used; definitive conclusions; consistent recommendations with thorough reference to scientific evidence.

B Good quality

Clear aims and objectives; formal quality improvement or financial evaluation methods used; consistent results in a single setting; reasonably consistent recommendations with some reference to scientific evidence.

C Low quality or major flaws

Unclear or missing aims and objectives; inconsistent results; poorly defined quality; improvement/financial analysis method; recommendations cannot be made.

Quality Rating for Case Report, Integrative Review, Literature Review, Expert Opinion, Community Standard, Clinician Experience, Consumer Preference (Level V)
A High quality

Expertise is clearly evident, draws definitive conclusions, and provides scientific rationale; thought leader in the field.

B Good quality

Expertise appears to be credible, draws fairly definitive conclusions, and provides logical argument for opinions.

C Low quality or major flaws

Expertise is not discernable or is dubious; conclusions cannot be drawn.

The post Evidence level and quality rating: appeared first on Infinite Essays.