*This paper would have to be cited correctly and writing in philosophy style. 
*Base off the book Mere Christianity
Your paper should be divided into two parts. In the first part (which should be 2-3 pages), you will provide a summary of the book’s contents. To do this well, you will have to not only present Lewis’ views accurately and clearly but also make editorial decisions about which parts to discuss: you can’t mention everything, so focus on the most important elements. In the second part of your paper (which should be 3-4 pages) you will offer your own critical reflections on the book, appealing to concepts, issues, and arguments we have discussed throughout the semester to inform your discussion. This portion of your paper should be focused in the sense that you should discuss only two or three issues from the book. Limiting your coverage in this way will enable you to discuss the topics you select with a good deal of depth. While you have a great deal of latitude in the way you develop this second section of your paper, the following approaches may be helpful:

1. Find a place in which Lewis and one of the authors we have considered argue for opposite conclusions and adjudicate the debate.

2. Identify an argument that we have seen in the semester and show how a portion of Lewis’ discussion either serves to support or undermine the argument in question.

3. Identify an argument in Mere Christianity and show how one of the readings we have considered either serves to support or undermine the argument in question.

4. Identify a theme that appears in both Mere Christianity and the course and explain how material from both has broadened or provided nuance for your understanding of the issue.

5. Identify a theme that appears in Mere Christianity that can help broaden or provide nuance for one of the issues that we have discussed in the course (and explain how it can do so).

Format: double-spaced, standard 12-point font, upload as a .pdf

Please remember to cite all sources as you make use of them (including Lewis).

I’ve updated the “Citing Sources for Intro to Philosophy” document that I’ve been attaching to the paper assignments to more specifically address how to list Mere Christianity on your Works Cited page.  Essentially, everyone will need a Works Cited page (in addition to their in-text citations) with an entry that lists Mere Christianity.  And, on that Works Cited entry, you need to let me know all the specific bibliographic information about the version of Mere Christianity you are using. 

Assignment #2.  Book Review

Please choose one book tomorrow so I can sign up for my book (we need to first sign up then work on the paper). Then Ill buy the book you need to write about and upload it/send it to you!

Choose one of the following for your book review.  Choose carefullyyou can read reviews.  Students sometimes say, I had no idea this was abouther life or being a caregiver  Figure out what the book is about and if it is of interest before you make your selection. )
o    Baker, B. (2007). Old Age in a New Age: The Promise of Transformative Nursing Homes. Vanderbilt University Press (ISBN 0826515630, 9780826515636).

o    Baker, B. (2014).  With a little help from our friends: Creating Community as we Grow Older.  Vanderbilt University Press 978-0-8265-1988-7.

o    Gawande, A. (2014). Being Mortal. Medicine and What Matters in the End. Picador 978-1250076229.

o    Jurkowski, E. T. (2013). Implementing Culture Change in Long-Term Care: Benchmarks and Strategies for Management and Practice. Springer Publishing Company 978-0826109088.

o    Letvitsky, S. R (2014). Caring for our own: Why there is no political demand for new American social welfare rights. Oxford University Press. (ISBN 978-0-19-999313-0).

  Your book review should be about 750-850 words.  Your book review will be graded on how accurately you summarize the book (60%), the extent to which you address each question in a thoughtful and analytical way rather than just I agreed with all the points in the book and it was perfect (30%), and basic execution (e.g., writing, organization) (10%).

Please provide a short summary of the key points of the book. Add your own critique as follows: 
1.    What are the key lessons learned for students of this course (LTSS healthcare course)?
2.    Identify and discuss areas that you disagree with and why you disagree. 
3.    Are there areas that should have been addressed that were not?
4.    Would you recommend this book to someone interested in LTSS?