Safety and Security in Air Transportation

You will prepare a 12 – 15 page research paper on a contemporary international aviation industry issue. (Safety and Security in Air Travel)

You will:

Define and/or articulate a research problem. 

Design a course of action to solve a research problem using, as appropriate, multidisciplinary approaches.

Apply ethical principles in your research. 

Address any ethical/social issues relevant to your research topic.

Reach decisions or conclusions based on the analysis and synthesis of evidence.

Content:

Please remember that the nature of the class is to investigate international aviation management and its three elements: the nature of international aviation business; working in a foreign environment; and managing in an international environment 

The focus of the paper should revolve around this theme. Papers that do not address this topic, but focus instead on other important, but irrelevant issues, will not grade well.

Performance Measurement on Needs Recognition, Alternative Evaluation, and Choice

Pick a major product or service that you recently purchased. As you were proceeding through the steps of the consumer decision-making process, what role did the various types of risk play in your ultimate decision regarding the product or service? For instance, if you recently purchased a new automobile or big-screen television, what were the financial, social, performance, physical, and time risks that you considered?

In your initial post, complete the following tasks:

Review the materials on the instructional resources (Chapters 11, 12, and 13) and lecture presentation pages.
Think back to a major product or service that you recently purchased. What could the provider of that product or service do with its marketing strategy to reduce that level of risk and increase your level of satisfaction? Provide a summary of the item that you purchased and the role that each of these risks played in your decision-making process.

Analytical Writing assignment

ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSIGNMENT

Carefully review the scenario set forth below.  Unless otherwise stated, assume the precedents and laws to be utilized are for the present day. Your analysis may be no longer than three pages, double spaced, 12 font, Times New Roman.

            Officer B. D. Mann received an anonymous tip that a known fugitive wanted for a felony, I. Dunn Flew, was hiding at the home of Rita Conceala.  Acting on the tip, Officer Mann did a background check on Rita and learned that she was on probation for Solicitation.  Mann then contacted Ritas probation officer, Woody, and told Woody about the tip he had received.  Woody then tried to contact Rita but was unable to reach her.  Woody told Officer Mann about the fact that Rita had given a general consent to all searches by a Probation Officer of her person, house papers and effects as a condition of probation.

            The police went to Ritas room, and found what appeared to be contraband white powder in her toiletries case.  Flew was not there.  The police went into the room next to Ritas and found evidence that Rita had been conducting an extensive call girl operation out of the boarding house.  Rita was charged and sentenced to jail for violating her probation.  Rita was also charged with a new charge of Solicitation.

            Based on the evidence obtained in the room next door to Ritas, the police obtained a warrant to search the home of Irma Hooker.  The police, on the authority of the warrant, searched the home of Irma Hooker, and found evidence: ledgers, bank deposits, records and receipts of the solicitation business.  Among the records were the names of some prominent citizens, including the judge, Royal Hammerdem, who issued the search warrant, and who, it was later learned, did not know Irmas real name or address.  At a subsequent hearing, the court found that the warrant for Hookers home was defective because of a technicality in the form filed: Hookers name was actually an alias and not her proper name.

            The men who were named as Johns were charged with petty offense charges carrying less than 6 months in jail as punishment.  All of these Johns demanded trial by jury and that lawyers be appointed for them.  The court refuses to appoint lawyers for the Johns, and after a trial sentences them to a fine and a 30 day suspended sentence.  The Johns demand a lawyer for appeal, and after denial of their appeal at the intermediary appeals court, the Johns demand appointment of a lawyer for the discretionary appeal to the State Supreme Court.

            Officer Mann also convinced Irma to make contact with the Judge involved, and Irma agreed to wear a wire when she spoke with the judge.  During the conversation with Irma, the judge made incriminating statements about a cover up and obstruction of justice, which Mann recorded from the radio transmissions.

            Acting on other information obtained from Irma, Officer Mann, from the department helicopter flying at 400 feet, observed in a partially covered green house located in the back yard of Mayor, Bob N. Weave, several green, leafy plants believed to be cannabis sativa.  Based on this information, a warrant was obtained and the Mayors property was searched and evidence of drug production was seized.  Police also seized the trash from the street in front of the Mayors house, and in that trash they found records of drug sales and receipts.  The warrant did not include the trash located on the street in front of the Mayors house.

            Mann, acting on further evidence obtained from Irma, placed a radio transmitter on the outside of the telephone booth located outside the police station.  The conversations coming from the telephone booth were recorded by Mann.  One of these recordings was that of the Chief of Police, I.M. Crank, trying to arrange a cover up for the judge involved.  The defendants all wanted to know how a person in their own, other states and the federal government got their jobs and could do practically whatever they wanted to do.  The defendants also wanted to be informed about the various avenues of appeals and what types of things can be appealed should that become necessary, as well as what role that the media coverage and current political climate might play in the judicial decisions.

            After the arrests, the local paper ran a picture of Crank talking to Irma at a time three weeks prior to the arrests.  Based on this picture, the police had probable cause to obtain a warrant to search the local papers files for other pictures implicating Crank with Irma.  Assume the probable cause was valid, and that the police obtained a warrant based on the probable cause to search the newspaper.

            Officer Mann is driving in an unmarked police vehicle, and he sees Hammerdem fail to signal the right turn that Hammerdem made.  Mann really wants to search Hammerdem and his car for evidence, but does not have probable cause.  Mann makes a traffic stop, and after speaking with the judge Mann arrests Hammerdem for the failure to use the turn signal.  Before applying handcuffs to Hammerdem and while Hammerdem is standing beside the car, Mann then searches all of Hammerdems pockets and he finds a check ledger with notations about payments for Irma.  Further, in the car right nex to where Hammerdem is standing, there is a gift-wrapped package appearing to be a present on the floor of the judges car.  Mann opens the present and finds $10,000 cash with a note saying, You know what to do.     

            Based on another anonymous tip, Mann drives by the home of the mayors associate, Richard Bum Osculator.  Mann with the assistance of a geologist friend uses an infrared heat detector to try to learn if an excess amount of heat is emanating from the roof of Osculators condo.  Mann believes that if Osculator is raising marijuana then the heat lamps employed in this plant growing process will cause a significantly higher amount of heat to be lost through the roof of the condo, as compared to the roof of the neighboring homes.  The heat detector indeed does demonstrate that a disproportionate amount of heat is escaping from Osculators roof.  Assume (for the sake for this examination) that, Mann, therefore, has probable cause that Osculator is growing marijuana.  Because Mann has probable cause of a felony being committed, Mann goes to Osculators home and after knocking and announcing his presence, with no response thereto, Mann enters the home to arrest Osculator, who happens to be in the shower.  Prior to the arrest the officer makes a quick sweep through the home to ensure his own safety, and on the bedroom table there is an ashtray with partially smoked marijuana cigarettes, which Mann seizes and keeps for evidence.  Mann also, subsequent to the arrest, finds extensive drug sales paraphernalia in the basement closest of Osculators home. 

Bipola Disorder pATHO-

Respond to the Subject below following the following topics. By adding substantive addition.
1.First substantive addition: content Demonstrates high level of understanding related to original post. Adds information relevant to nursing practice. Demonstrates critical analysis. Based in evidence (2 points)
2. First substantive addition: Writing mechanics Integrates at least one citation/reference from evidence-based source other than required textbook. Fewer than four writing mechanics errors. Flows clearly and logically. (2 point
3. Second substantive addition: content Demonstrates high level of understanding related to original post. Adds information relevant to nursing practice. Demonstrates critical analysis. Based in evidence (2 points
3. second substantive addition: Writing mechanics Integrates at least one citation/reference from evidence-based source other than required textbook. Fewer than four writing mechanics errors. Flows clearly and logically. (2 point

Pathophysiology helps us understand the ‘whys’, enabling you to better generalize that knowledge to similar situations. This is a big part of critical thinking and clinical judgment! When you truly understand the rationale behind what you see and what you do, light bulb moments occur, and nursing process makes sense!! When you understand the whys, critical thinking expands, and you will able to generalize that knowledge of pathophysiology to a variety of patient scenarios. And when you can do that, patients often experience better outcomes! Not everyone you will care for has a single, or definitive medical diagnosis. Not all individuals with a diagnosis fit the textbook scenario. As nurses we assess individuals with unique signs and symptoms we dont assess a stroke or MI we assess people! There are many signs and symptoms that have a variety of causes. And there are many health alterations that manifest in multiple ways, particularly when there are other comorbidities. This makes it imperative that the nurse is able to think about a whole situation critically and figure out what is going on from a pathophysiologic perspective. For example, when a person presents with tachypnea it could be related to COVID 19, asthma, ARDS, heart failure, anemia, over exertion, fever, neurologic injury, gastric distension, activity intolerance, complications of diabetes, anxiety, acid base imbalance, drug overdose, and more. When a person presents with confusion, it could be related to a stroke, MI, heart failure, cerebral hypoxia, neurologic injury, anxiety, medication change, infection, and more. The nurse must look at the whole situation and think critically to help the patient. All confusion is not the same, all breathing challenges are not the same! And appropriate intervention depends on the through assessment of the specific situation. Understanding the why of your intervention helps you to generalize interventions to similar situations. For example, why did you administer pain medication? In the situation of an MI, why did you administer morphine? To reduce pain; reduce the workload of the heart (and so decrease myocardial oxygen demand); relax smooth muscle (and so decrease BP and reduce cardiac workload); and reduce circulating catecholamines (and so reduce the heart rate and myocardial oxygen demand). Why did you administer acetaminophen when a person has a fever? For comfort, but also to decrease the work of the heart, the work of the lungs, and sometimes to reduce fluid loss and maintain vascular volume. Why is supplemental oxygen helpful when a person experiences activity intolerance? Why doesnt the administration of oxygen help in situations of ARDS?? Often 12 our interventions have cascading type effects. When you understand the whys of assessment findings and interventions, critical thinking expands, and you should be able to generalize that knowledge of pathophysiology to a variety of patient situations. And when you can do that, patients often experience better outcomes!

pLEASE SEE ATTACHED PRESENTATION TO RESPOND TO.