Healthcare, Ethics & Law

Please choose 2 of the following 3 Essay Questions. To assist you in formulating your answers, students may refer to the assigned texts as well as written materials provided and their own class notes and power point presentations. This so-called Open Book examination approach is in keeping with the breadth of the inter-relationships of the ethical and legal underpinnings of the practice and administration of contemporary healthcare.

Best of Luck,

Judge A.

                                                                                    I.

The New Jersey Health Commissioner is keenly aware of the excellent reputation of the Masters of Health Administration Program at the Bloustein School of Rutgers University and its outstanding students. In light of this, she seeks your advice concerning an upcoming regulatory inspection concerning the Departments compliance with state, federal and professional licensure requirements of its Institutional Ethics Committees.

Please prepare an in-depth memorandum addressing the genesis, purpose, function, structure and goals of the Committee as well as the current role of its consultation process and its contribution to the institutions overall mission.

                                                                                  II.

The prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, mindful of the students reputation in the MHA Program at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, is seeking monographs concerning the rapidly growing use of traditional, genetic and gestational surrogacy reflecting your knowledge and insight into the emerging efforts to legalize and monetize a medical protocol now accepted, in some form or other, by 15 of the United States. Moreover, the Journal wishes to do a definitive update on the practice and the historical contribution of the landmark Baby M case.

The Journal solicits from you an analysis of the renowned legal opinion and an elaboration of the medical, ethical and legal concerns that endeavor to shape a national consensus. Please prepare an overview of past, present and anticipated surrogacy practices that will inform and authenticate your conclusions.

                                                                                            III.

The New Jersey Medical Society (the nations oldest Society of physicians, founded in 1766) mindful that Bloustein students are in the forefront of medical-ethical scholarship, has submitted an important question concerning a Louisiana abortion law which requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. This is of concern to the Societys members as the requirement may place some doctors at legal and licensure risk for potential failure to be able to comply. Please analyze the ethical and legal arguments against the backdrop of the Roe v Wade, Planned Parenthood v Casey and Right to Choose v Byrne decisions. The question is designed to elicit a fair and balanced catalogue of societys differing viewpoints concerning womens reproductive rights and gender equality.

Review of Assigned Articles

You will be required to write review essays three times during the term, with due dates specified on the syllabus. Please note that while your review essay may invoke themes from our class discussion, it should not be a cut-and-paste of your discussion posts. Work that repeats class discussions with little or no additional insight may receive a failing grade.

The goal of a review essay is to take stock of the assigned readings, by discussing and critiquing various arguments/sides about a phenomenon/issue area. Review essays should be about 4-6 double-spaced pages with paragraph structure, in-text citations, and a bibliography, not to mention correct grammar and spelling. Review essays (but not the grades or my comments) may be shared with the class and should be seen as a useful tool for preparing for more specialized MSIR courses and your comprehensive exams or capstone.  The essays should try to bring together the literature by finding common ideas as well as discussing the differences. This means I expect you to cite multiple readings from the course in each essay and to analyze rather than summarize. You are also highly encouraged to make connections between different weeks readings.

It is best to organize a review essay thematically, integrating your discussion of the readings rather than discussing each separately.  Thus, rather than simply outlining one authors argument in one paragraph, and a second authors argument in another, you should focus on ideas. A good tip for doing this is to look at question stems based on Blooms Taxonomy of learning. A review essay should focus on higher-order learning, especially questions about application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The question stems located under those categories here can provide a starting point for your essays: http://www.mandela.ac.za/cyberhunts/bloom.htm.

My process reflection

German Expansion 1936-1939

Question 1: Put the Source in Context
Situate the source, its creator, and its purpose in the context of other historical events, developments, or processes (nationally or regionally). What conclusions can you draw from this source based on this contextualization?

Question 2: Consider a Question
Evaluate and analyze the source in relation to this historical question: In evaluating this map consider what it demonstrates about the goals of a rearmed Germany. What does it demonstrate in regards to German’s attitudes toward the countries created during the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 (Including but not limited to the Treaty of Versailles)? Also consider both Hitler’s and Stalin’s motives regarding Poland.

Question 3: BEFORE READING

Analyze Reflection of Time Period
What is the source designed to portray about a time period? Consider the creator’s purpose and point-of-view. How is the information presented representative of the time period?

Question 4: REFLECTION

Analyze your process
Use this space to reflect on the process of source analysis and interpretation used during the assignment. Which strategies helped you the most? Which strategies posed the greatest challenge?

Power fundamentally involves __________ between or among people. friendships shared property animosities relationships Power is: the ability to…

Power fundamentally involves __________ between or among people.

friendships

shared property

animosities

relationships

Power is:

the ability to influence another person’s behavior.

having many advanced weapons.

achieving voluntary consensus among groups.

persuading people to act independently of government authority.

Which of the following was NOT a weakness of the Articles of Confederation (1781-1789)?

a weak “league of friendship” among the states

the requirement of unanimous approval by all 13 states for amendments

no judicial branch

no congressional power to impose taxes

Which of the following was NOT a strength of the Articles of Confederation (1781-1789)?

the power to declare war

conduct foreign policy

manage a postage system

oversee an army composed of federal militia

Protection from government intrusion into the private lives and beliefs of citizens is guaranteed by the __________ and __________ Amendments.

First and Second

Second and Ninth

Ninth and Eleventh

First and Ninth

How did the White House “spin” the story of British troop withdrawal from Iraq?

The withdrawal was needed to make room for the U.S. troop surge

The withdrawal was recommended by Vice President Cheney.

That this was a sign of political weakness for British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

The withdrawal was a sign of success of the coalition and of the British presence in southern Iraq.

Though there are up to __________ judges on an appeals court, only __________ usually hear each case.

12; 5

12; 3

15; 5

28; 3

Approximately __________ of the country’s adult population has Internet access.

25%

33%

67%

85%

Most Americans view themselves as members of the __________ class.

upper

middle

lower

none of the above(they do not define themselves)

A plural elitist might consider the compromises struck during the health care reform debate to be an example of elite interest groups each pursuing and achieving their separate sets of agendas.

plural elitist

fundamentalist

conspiracy theorists

Both A and C

The post Power fundamentally involves __________ between or among people. friendships shared property animosities relationships Power is: the ability to… appeared first on Submit Your Homeworks.


Power fundamentally involves __________ between or among people. friendships shared property animosities relationships Power is: the ability to… was first posted on October 31, 2020 at 7:42 pm.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”