Imagine that you have been named project leader for a non-profit serving residents in the rural northwest of Haiti. As part of a needs assessment, qualitative data were collected through interviews with women in the community. Interview questions focused on health complaints, barriers to healthcare, and living conditions. Your job is to conduct content analysis on the qualitative data to determine common themes that can inform the development of new programs to serve the community.

Since this is your first time conducting qualitative data analysis, your supervisor gives you some tips. First, your supervisor reads through the transcripts with you and helps you determine common codes. (Codes are important concepts that are mentioned by participants. They are often repeated by more than one participant although, of course, the wording will differ.) Your supervisor helps you develop a codebook that details code name, definition, and example content from participant response

Book Review on book: Crazy by Pete Earley,
Write a reflection paper on the book Crazy.

In a 5 page double spaced paper discuss the following three concepts addressed in the book:

The intended and unintended consequences of deinstitutionalization.
The ethical dilemma of self-determination vs. duty to protect (Use of NASW Code of ethics and your state commitment laws will enhance your paper and increase your grade).
Needed changes in policy and programs to address the above issues and provide adequate services to persons with mental illness and their families.

Rubric Criteria   
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome intended consequences
student is able to articulate the actual intentions/positive outcomes of deinstitutionalization.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome unintended consequences
student is able to articulate the disasterous, unintended consequences of deinstitutionalization, including those that currently exist

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome paternalism vs self-determination
student is able to articulate his/her own position/thoughts about forcing treatment for “ones own good” versus supporting clients right to refuse treatment–ie “Where do you stand on this issue?”

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Ethics/State laws
Student is able to identify articulate the relavent code from NASW Code of Ethics and the circumstances allowed to force treatment/hospitalization under student’s state of clinical practice or rescidence.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome grammar /sentence structure
Expectation of high level of academic, professional writing with minimal errors

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome needed changes
student able to articulate policy/programs changes that have been described by the author to address current treatment of clients with severe and chronic mental illness