How many phones can be made from the available parts, and when can they be delivered?

/in /by

A telephone is assembled from a handset and a base. The handset in turn is assembled from a handle and a cord, and the base is assembled from a case, a circuit board, and a face plate. A BOM and a sketch of the phone, along with the numbers of parts on hand and lead times, are shown as follows. a. Management would like to start assembling phones as soon as possible. How many phones can be made from the available parts, and when can they be delivered? Construct a materials plan to show your answer. b. For the materials plan constructed in part a, develop an inventory projection of parts and finished goods on a week-by-week basis. c. Suppose another 100 circuit boards can be obtained within one week. What effect will this have on your answer for part a?

 

. WITH BEST NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper

The post How many phones can be made from the available parts, and when can they be delivered? appeared first on BEST NURSING TUTORS .

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post How many phones can be made from the available parts, and when can they be delivered? first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

This assignment is six different assignment that is inter connected to each other, which means… 1 answer below »

/in /by

This assignment is six different assignment that is inter connected to each other, which means that part two is a continuation of one and part three is a continuation of two, up to part six which is the final draft

Part one

Identifyone health care program area of activity in a population-based health organization you want to evaluate. You may use the organization where you work or the Moreno Medical Center virtual organization.

You will be creating a proposal for a small-scale research project to evaluate your selected program.

Writea 350-word overview of your topic selection for the Health Care Program Evaluation Proposal, due in Week 8.

Usethe following information below as an outline for your overview. An example of how this outline should look can be viewed within the Moreno Medical Center virtual organization for any of the programs listed within the Director of Research, located under the Administration tab. Program title Program goal Program purpose Program scope Program audience Program background Rationale for developing this evaluation plan Existing program evaluation program model, if available References

Formatthe overview consistent with APA guidelines or the examples found in Moreno Medical Center.

Includea cover page indicating the name of the program.

.Note.The topic and program must receive approval from the instructor. If using an existing or planned program, communicate with the instructor prior to finalizing this assignment to ensure the program and your knowledge level provides an effective fit for meeting the course expectations in the timeframe. If using one of Moreno Medical Center's programs, content may be added to the overview sections to personalize your plan.

Scoring or grading rubric for part one Week Three: Health Care Program Evaluation Plan Topic Overview

Identify one health care program area of activity in a population-based health organization you want to evaluate. You may use the organization where you work or the Moreno Medical Center virtual organization.

You will be creating a proposal for a small-scale research project to evaluate your selected program.

Write a 350-word overview of your topic selection for the Health Care Program Evaluation Proposal, due in Week 8.

Use the following information below as an outline for your overview. An example of how this outline should look can be viewed within the Moreno Medical Center virtual organization for any of the programs listed within the Director of Research, located under the Administration tab.

Points

Points Earned

Comments

Program Title

1

Program Goals

1

Program Purpose

1

Program Scope

1

Program Audience

1

Program Background

2.5

Rationale for Developing this Evaluation Plan

1

Existing Program Evaluation Program Model, if Available

.5

References

.5

Format the overview consistent with APA guidelines or the examples found in Moreno Medical Center.

Include a cover page indicating the name of the program.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Note. The topic and program must receive approval from the instructor.

If using an existing or planned program, communicate with the instructor prior to finalizing this assignment to ensure the program and your knowledge level provides an effective fit for meeting the course expectations in the timeframe.

If using one of Moreno Medical Center's programs, content may be added to the overview sections to personalize your plan.

.5

Total

10

The link tothe Moreno Medical Center virtual organization. Is https://multimedia.phoenix.edu/virtualorgs/moreno-medical-center/

Part Two

Writea draft of the first three sections of the program evaluation proposal to include the following: Introduction:This is not a summary of the proposal; it is a brief statement of the plan's purpose. Start with a clear purpose statement. Add a description of each major section, as presented in the completed plan. This section must be no more than one-half page in length. Review Ch. 1 and 2 of the Posavac (2011) text for further information. Program Background:Insert updated content with revisions based on facilitator feedback from the Week 2 topic overview assignment. This section must be no more than one-half page in length. Review Ch. 2 & 3 of the Posavac (2011) text for further information. Literature Review:Describe findings to date from a review and analysis of literature. This section must be one to two pages in length.

Formatyour draft according to the following: Title page, including title of the program, author's name, and institution name Table of contents, listing headings that are also found in the narrative, and corresponding page numbers Table of exhibits listing type, number, title, and corresponding page numbers; this includes Table of Tables and Table of Figures References–there should be one References section for the full proposal Appendixes (if applicable)–there should be one Appendix section for all appendices

Grading rubric for part two

Writea draft of the first three sections of the program evaluation proposal to include the following:

Points

Points Earned

Comments Introduction: This is not a summary of the proposal; it is a brief statement of the plan's purpose. Start with a clear purpose statement. Add a description of each major section, as presented in the completed plan. This section must be no more than one-half page in length. Review Ch. 1 and 2 of the Posavac (2011) text for further information.

3

Program Background: Insert updated content with revisions based on facilitator feedback from the Week 2 topic overview assignment. This section must be no more than one-half page in length. Review Ch. 2 & 3 of the Posavac (2011) text for further information.

4

• Literature Review: Describe findings to date from a review and analysis of literature. This section must be one to two pages in length.

4

Formatyour draft according to the following: Title page, including title of the program, author's name, and institution name Table of contents, listing headings that are also found in the narrative, and corresponding page numbers Table of exhibits listing type, number, title, and corresponding page numbers; this includes Table of Tables and Table of Figures References–there should be one References section for the full proposal Appendixes (if applicable)–there should be one Appendix section for all appendices

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit the assignment.

Note. Postyour paper to the Week 5 Draft 1 Peer Review required learning activity.

1

Total

12

Part Three

Resources:Literature Review section of Draft 1 of your proposal, Ch. 6 of Issel (2014), and Ch. 9 (pages 111-116) of Longest (2015)

Conductan in-depth critical review of health care programs similar to those from your Literature Review section of your proposal.

Identifyideas relating to the program topic that present theories on the effectiveness of program intervention and evaluation strategies.

Writea critical review and analysis of two or more peer-reviewed articles. You may also use examples of similar programs discussed in scholarly readings. The review should be no longer than 1,225 words. Apply and integrate concepts from the course readings in your analysis.

Includethe following in your critical review. Use scholarly resources to support your viewpoint for each: A comparison of the programs A description of why some program intervention and evaluation strategies are more effective than others. The stated or perceived program evaluation theories behind each of the programs An analysis of whether your program is in alignment with similar programs in terms of program purpose, program theory, interventions, stakeholders, resources, goals, and objectives A summary of the learning garnered in this assignment that can be applied to the development of your own program evaluation plan Conclusions addressing what you will be adding and/or revising to the Literature Review section of your proposal Potential goals and objectives to include in your proposal

Scoring or grading rubric for part three

Week 5 Case Study Critical Review Rubric Resources: Literature Review section of Draft 1 of your proposal, Ch. 6 of Issel (2014), and Ch. 9 (pages 111-116) of Longest (2015)

Conductan in-depth critical review of health care programs similar to those from your Literature Review section of your proposal.

Identifyideas relating to the program topic that present theories on the effectiveness of program intervention and evaluation strategies.

Write a critical review and analysis of two or more peer-reviewed articles. You may also use examples of similar programs discussed in scholarly readings. The review should be no longer than 1,225 words. Apply and integrate concepts from the course readings in your analysis.

Include the following in your critical review. Use scholarly resources to support your viewpoint for each:

Points

Points Earned

Comments

· A comparison of the programs. A description of why some program intervention and evaluation strategies are more effective than others.

3

· The stated or perceived program evaluation theories behind each of the programs.

3

· An analysis of whether your program is in alignment with similar programs in terms of program purpose, program theory, interventions, stakeholders, resources, goals, and objectives

2

· A summary of the learning garnered in this assignment that can be applied to the development of your own program evaluation plan

2

· Conclusions addressing what you will be adding and/or revising to the Literature Review section of your proposal

1

· Potential goals and objectives to include in your proposal

1

Format your critical review consistent with APA guidelines.

· Click the Assignment Files tab to submit the assignment.

2

Total

14

Part Four

Writea draft of the next three sections of the program evaluation proposal to include the following: Program Evaluation Goals and Objectives: Theoretical Framework What is the general goal for designing or selecting an evaluation plan based on the theoretical framework and program setting? What is the specific program and evaluation theory behind similar programs? What are the common goals and objectives of similar programs? Is the organization's program in alignment with similar programs in terms of purpose, stakeholders, resources, goals, and objectives? What specific questions must the evaluation model answer to evaluate the program for internal and external stakeholders? What specific processes, output, outcomes, or implementation goals must be evaluated? What are the objectives of the program evaluation in terms of providing data, information, and resources to internal stakeholders, such as performance dashboards to monitor processes, quality, outputs, resources, costs, revenue, and other implementation and outcome measurements? Evaluation Model Design: Provide an overall qualitative or quantitative approach to the evaluation. Describe from where, whom, and when data will be collected. Describe the participants and sampling, if appropriate to the program being evaluated. If evaluating a program involving input or by patients, clients, or consumers, how will participants be recruited or selected, such as for a patient satisfaction survey? Sampling methods and sample size: Will the program evaluation model evaluate all participants, processes, outputs, or outcomes, or use a research-based sampling method? Evaluation Methods: Procedures for data collection: Describe the procedures used, such as retrospective historical performance, program utilization, financial and outcome data, electronic medical records, laboratory or quality software application data capture and reporting, focus group discussion, or questionnaire surveys. Will the evaluation include capturing quantitative and qualitative data and information?

Scoring or grading rubric for part 4 Week Six -Draft 2 – Health Care Program Evaluation Proposal

Writea draft of the next three sections of the program evaluation proposal to include the following:

Points Program Evaluation Goals and Objectives:

Theoretical Framework

o What is the general goal for designing or selecting an evaluation plan based on the theoretical framework and program setting?

o What is the specific program and evaluation theory behind similar programs?

o What are the common goals and objectives of similar programs?

o Is the organization's program in alignment with similar programs in terms of purpose, stakeholders, resources, goals, and objectives?

· What specific questions must the evaluation model answer to evaluate the program for internal and external stakeholders?

· What specific processes, output, outcomes, or implementation goals must be evaluated?

· What are the objectives of the program evaluation in terms of providing data, information, and resources to internal stakeholders, such as performance dashboards to monitor processes, quality, outputs, resources, costs, revenue, and other implementation and outcome measurements?

5 Evaluation Model Design:

· Provide an overall qualitative or quantitative approach to the evaluation.

· Describe from where, whom, and when data will be collected.

· Describe the participants and sampling, if appropriate to the program being evaluated.

· If evaluating a program involving input or by patients, clients, or consumers, how will participants be recruited or selected, such as for a patient satisfaction survey?

· Sampling methods and sample size: Will the program evaluation model evaluate all participants, processes, outputs, or outcomes, or use a research-based sampling method?

5 Evaluation Methods:

· Procedures for data collection: Describe the procedures used, such as retrospective historical performance, program utilization, financial and outcome data, electronic medical records, laboratory or quality software application data capture and reporting, focus group discussion, or questionnaire surveys.

· Will the evaluation include capturing quantitative and qualitative data and information?

5 Click the Assignment Files tab to submit the assignment.

Note. Postyour paper to the Week 7 Draft 2 Peer Review required learning activity

Total

15

Part Five

Writea draft of the next two sections of the program evaluation proposal to include the following: Data Analysis and Reporting: What software programs, report generation tools, and analytics will be used for compiling, data mining, storing, and retrieving current and historical data for analysis and reporting? What are the overall capabilities and limitations of the software? Is there any known data needed for program evaluation that is not currently accessible through the health care organization's interfaced information system? Is there a cost-benefit consideration involving manual collection for analysis and custom reports for reporting warranting economic evaluation or cost analysis? Economic Evaluation: Problem or purpose warranting an economic evaluation The economic- or program-related theory that supports an economic evaluation Economic or cost analysis questions to be answered related to the purpose Stipulate if comparing to another program or interventions Justifying the need for a cost description or analysis Decision rules Each type of economic evaluation and cost analysis Accounting perspective and corresponding costs & benefits to be evaluated Data and methods used Resource limitations

Scoring or grading rubric for week seven

Week Seven- Health Care Program Evaluation Proposal

Writea draft of the next two sections of the program evaluation proposal to include the following:

Points

Points Earned

Comments Data Analysis and Reporting:

· What software programs, report generation tools, and analytics will be used for compiling, data mining, storing, and retrieving current and historical data for analysis and reporting?

· What are the overall capabilities and limitations of the software?

· Is there any known data needed for program evaluation that is not currently accessible through the health care organization's interfaced information system?

· Is there a cost-benefit consideration involving manual collection for analysis and custom reports for reporting warranting economic evaluation or cost analysis?

7.5

Economic Evaluation:

· Problem or purpose warranting an economic evaluation

· The economic- or program-related theory that supports an economic evaluation

· Economic or cost analysis questions to be answered related to the purpose

· Stipulate if comparing to another program or interventions

· Justifying the need for a cost description or analysis

· Decision rules

· Each type of economic evaluation and cost analysis

· Accounting perspective and corresponding costs & benefits to be evaluated

· Data and methods used

· Resource limitations

7.5

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit the assignment.

Total Points

15

Part Six

Note: Review, update, and finalize the previous draft sections of your Health Care Program Evaluation Proposal. Integrate these sections into the final submission.

Completethe final two sections of the proposal: Ethical, Equity, and Leadership Considerations Implementing and Monitoring Strategies

Finalizethe full proposal for a small-scale research project to evaluate your program. Your final proposal must be between 8,750 and 10,500 words. Title page, references page, table of contents, figures, and appendices do not count toward the minimum required length. All sources must be carefully referenced. Your proposal must include at least 25 references with at least 15 peer-reviewed sources.

Outlineyour Health Care Program Evaluation Proposal as follows: Title page, including title of study, author's name, and institution name Table of contents, listing headings that are in the narrative, and corresponding page numbers Table of exhibits listing type, number, title, and corresponding page numbers Introduction Program background Literature review Theoretical Framework Program evaluation goals and specific objectives Evaluation model design Evaluation methods Data analysis and reporting Economic evaluation Ethical, equity, and leadership considerations Implementing and monitoring strategies References

Scoring or grading rubric for week eight :

1Produces final sections of proposal(30%) Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not complete the final two sections of the evaluation proposal consisting of 1) Ethical, Equity and Leadership Considerations and 2) Implementing and Monitoring Strategies. Approaches Expectations

Completes the two final sections consisting of 1) Ethical, Equity and Leadership Considerations and 2) Implementing and Monitoring Strategies in a manner that is poorly written redundant content in conjunction with the rest of the proposal. Sections are only partially integrated into the overall proposal. Meets Expectations

Completes well written final two sections of the evaluation proposal in a manner that includes well aligned, clear and descriptive content relating to 1) Ethical, Equity and Leadership Considerations and 2) Implementing and Monitoring Strategies. The content reflects sound principles in each area and is fully integrated into the overall proposal. Exceeds Expectations

Completes well written final two sections of the evaluation proposal in a manner that includes well aligned, clear and descriptive content relating to 1) Ethical, Equity and Leadership Considerations and 2) Implementing and Monitoring Strategies. The content reflects sound principles in each area and is fully integrated into the overall proposal with reference to previous sections.

2Completes final draft of proposal integrating all sections covered in course(40%) Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not complete the final draft of the proposal that integrates all sections and produces a complete proposal draft. Approaches Expectations

Compiles all sections of the proposal into a final draft. The final draft partially integrates all sections and reflects a document with transitions between sections but is unclear and lacks depth in exposition of each area covered. Meets Expectations

Compiles all sections of the proposal into a final draft. The final draft fully integrates all sections and clearly reflect a document with appropriate transitions between sections and clear in depth exposition of each area covered. Exceeds Expectations

Compiles all sections of the proposal into a final draft. The final draft fully integrates all sections and clearly reflect a document with appropriate transitions between sections and clear in depth exposition of each area covered. Each section of the proposal builds upon the previous section.

3ULG: 3, 4(20%) Does Not Meet Expectations

Outlines the health care program evaluation proposal but does not include each required section from the signature assignment. Approaches Expectations

Outlines the health care program evaluation proposal to include each required section from the signature assignment. Major points lack support from multiple detailed subpoints. Meets Expectations

Outlines the health care program evaluation proposal to include each required section from the signature assignment. Major points are supported by multiple detailed subpoints. Exceeds Expectations

Outlines the health care program evaluation proposal to include each required section from the signature assignment. Major points are supported by multiple detailed subpoints. Subpoints fully align with each section.

4Scholarly writing and APA editorial style(10%) Does Not Meet Expectations

Did not comply with appropriate scholarly APA format Approaches Expectations

Followed APA format generally but without sound scholarly writing Meets Expectations

Followed APA format with few errors and with a generally appropriate scholarly tone Exceeds Expectations

Complied with APA editorial style and presented in a scholarly voice and tone

 

. WITH nursingessayswriters.com AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT!

The post This assignment is six different assignment that is inter connected to each other, which means… 1 answer below » first appeared on nursingessayswriters.com.

This assignment is six different assignment that is inter connected to each other, which means… 1 answer below » was first posted on September 19, 2020 at 4:07 am.
©2019 "nursingessayswriters.com". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at ukbestwriting@gmail.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post This assignment is six different assignment that is inter connected to each other, which means… 1 answer below » first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

organizational change 41

/in /by

Week 5 – Final Paper

Final Paper

Think of an organization you have worked for or one with which you are very familiar. Diagnose the need for change and present a plan to transform the organization, utilizing Kotter’s 8-Step Approach.

You will need to research the Kotter 8 Step Change Model extensively. You are encouraged to first review this article (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. You may select any organization or department where you work or where you have previously worked; however, you are strongly encouraged to diagnose one problem area in the company. Attempting to diagnose an entire company is not feasible, and you will become bogged down.

If you choose a company similar to Walmart to analyze, select just one area that you think needs improvement. For example, Walmart is now very strong in online shopping, yet there are still glitches in the system. Delivery times are often late, the packaging method has problems, and some products come from unknown vendors that Walmart does not guarantee. We may know this from personal experience, but that is not enough. Statements, opinions, and experiences must be supported with valid sources. There are many articles online that you can review easily and quickly.

Your sources for this paper must include research for the company you choose, a valid source for the Kotter model, and your textbook. You are encouraged to read as many articles as you can find and contact the Ashford librarians for guidance. There is bias, missing or incorrect information, and contradictory material in most Internet material. The amount of material can be confusing, but wade through it and question everything.

Include the following sections headings and additional sections as needed:

  1. Introduction
  2. Company Overview
  3. Diagnosis
  4. Kotter’s 8-Step Approach
  5. Conclusion

The Final Paper for the course must be submitted to the instructor by 11:59 p.m. of the time zone in which you reside on the last day of the class.

Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:

  1. Must be eight- to- ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.
  2. Must include a title page that includes:
    1. Title of paper
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
  6. Must use at least five scholarly sources.
  7. Must use APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide to document all sources.
  8. Must include, on the final page, a Reference Page that is completed according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post organizational change 41 first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

1 With respect to decision making: a, Discuss Simon’s model within the context of an example. (12 marks) b, Compare Simon’s model to Lewin’s view of…

/in /by

1， With respect to decision making:

a, Discuss Simon’s model within the context of an example. (12 marks)

b, Compare Simon’s model to Lewin’s view of decision making. Make sure you support your answer with examples. (8 marks)

2, with respect to Herzberg’s two factor theory:

a, Discuss the theory within the context of an example (8 marks)

b,Discuss the shortcomings of his data collection methodology. Make sure you supporting your answer with examples. (12 marks)

1Running header: DECISION MAKING BY THEORISTS NAMEINSTITUTION AFFILIATIONDATE DECISION MAKING BY THEORIST S 2DECISION MAKING BY THEORISTS Decision making by the theoristSimons’ model of…

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post 1 With respect to decision making: a, Discuss Simon’s model within the context of an example. (12 marks) b, Compare Simon’s model to Lewin’s view of… appeared first on Nursing Assignment.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post 1 With respect to decision making: a, Discuss Simon’s model within the context of an example. (12 marks) b, Compare Simon’s model to Lewin’s view of… first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.