As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans

For this assessment, you will use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis of a quality or safety issue in a health care setting of your choice and outline a plan to address the issue.

As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse’s role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other health care professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

· Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

· Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

· Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

· Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

· Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event within an organization.

· Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

· Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

· Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Professional Context

Nursing practice is governed by health care policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan:

· The specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

· The Vila Health: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Planning simulation.

· One of the case studies from the previous assessment.

· A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

Instructions

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the concern based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting to provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan Template [DOCX] to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

· Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.

· Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.

· Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

· Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.

· Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

· Assessment 2 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

· Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 4–6 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.

· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

· APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

For this assessment, you will use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis of a quality or safety issue in a health care setting of your choice and outline a plan to address the issue.

As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse’s role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other health care professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

· Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

· Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.

· Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

· Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

· Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event within an organization.

· Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

· Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

· Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Professional Context

Nursing practice is governed by health care policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan:

· The specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.

· The Vila Health: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Planning simulation.

· One of the case studies from the previous assessment.

· A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

Instructions

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the concern based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting to provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan Template [DOCX] to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

· Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.

· Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.

· Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.

· Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.

· Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

· Assessment 2 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

· Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 4–6 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.

· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

· APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

The post As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans appeared first on Infinite Essays.

AI, machine learning technologies and/or the IoT are renovating the business

Sources: Read through the British Academy/ Royal Society’s report on the Future of Work in the UK, and read through the PWC report on the same. Both reports explore the implications of AI /automation/ the IoT for the future of work.
Task: Reflect on everything you have learnt from these sources, and use the insights and information you have gleaned to assess how AI, machine learning technologies and/or the IoT are renovating the business processes of ONE of the following companies, and helping them to become future-ready. Consider, also,  to what extent the Covid crisis has pushed them to accelerate, intensify or perhaps modify the trajectory they were on. Choose ONE of the following companies to analyse.

NB: I am asking you to critically assess what these companies are doing with their AI/automation/IoT. If what they do does not seem to match their marketing claims, feel free to point this out (and explain your reasons).  If you feel some of their decisions are misguided, say so (but explain your reasons). If you really like what they are doing, say so too (and explain why).

IMPORTANT: Please reference the two reports mentioned above (British Academy & Royal Society one, and the PWC one) in your research project. Reference the websites I’ve given you below too (those that link to information about your chosen company) and feel free, of course, to do your own research and ADD what you have found to the sources I have given you.
Areas to investigate and analyse (not all these will necessarily apply to every one of the listed companies)

How AI/automation/IoT is changing the way your chosen business interacts with their customers
How AI/automation/IoT is affecting one or more of these areas of the business: personalisation, flexibility, speed, decision-making, scalability
How AI/automation/IoT is helping the company stay ahead of its competitors
How AI/automation/ IoT is helping the company cope in the Covid crisis
1. Trinny London (British; female founder and largely female customer base)

https://trinnylondon.com/us (Links to an external site.)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kittyknowles/2018/07/02/trinny-london-trinny-woodall-makeup-mini-travel-size-beauty-personalization-ai/#33b9b8b85068 (Links to an external site.)

https://vimeo.com/415915836/4349c1819a (Links to an external site.)

2. Vanmoof electric bikes (Dutch company)

https://www.vanmoof.com/en-GB/electric-bikes?gclid=CjwKCAjw74b7BRA_EiwAF8yHFBOdisX-0KWMfcp8iVPZM8V9UDooGAaIGFEk7cee5RfF_qU_Wwz0rBoCMukQAvD_BwE (Links to an external site.)

https://venturebeat.com/2020/09/16/vanmoof-raises-40-million-amid-ebike-boom/ (Links to an external site.)

3. Babylon Health (British HQ; operates in several countries)

https://www.babylonhealth.com/ai (Links to an external site.)

https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/europe/babylon-study-finds-new-ai-imagination-more-effective-gps-medical-diagnosis (Links to an external site.)

4. Stellapps Technologies (Indian company)

https://www.stellapps.com (Links to an external site.)

https://www.foodandfarmingtechnology.com/news/livestock-monitoring/dairy-herds-the-moooove-to-wearable-technology.html (Links to an external site.)

Areas to investigate and analyse:

How AI is changing the way these businesses interact with their customers
How AI is affecting one or more of these areas of the business: personalisation, flexibility, speed, decision-making, scalability
How AI is helping the company stay ahead of its competitors.

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Case Studies

A 52-year-old man complained of pain and cramping in his right calf caused by walking two blocks. The pain was relieved with cessation of activity. The pain had been increasing in frequency and intensity. Physical examination findings were essentially normal except for decreased hair on the right leg. The patient’s popliteal, dorsalis pedis, and posterior tibial pulses were markedly decreased compared with those of his left leg.

Studies Results
Routine laboratory work Within normal limits (WNL)
Doppler ultrasound systolic pressures Femoral: 130 mm Hg; popliteal: 90 mm Hg; posterior tibial: 88 mm Hg; dorsalis pedis: 88 mm Hg (normal: same as brachial systolic blood pressure)
Arterial plethysmography Decreased amplitude of distal femoral, popliteal, dorsalis pedis, and posterior tibial pulse waves
Femoral arteriography of right leg Obstruction of the femoral artery at the midthigh level
Arterial duplex scan Apparent arterial obstruction in the superficial femoral artery

Diagnostic Analysis

With the clinical picture of classic intermittent claudication, the noninvasive Doppler and plethysmographic arterial vascular study merely documented the presence and location of the arterial occlusion in the proximal femoral artery. Most vascular surgeons prefer arteriography to document the location of the vascular occlusion. The patient underwent a bypass from the proximal femoral artery to the popliteal artery. After surgery he was asymptomatic.

Critical Thinking Questions

1. What was the cause of this patient’s pain and cramping?

2. Why was there decreased hair on the patient’s right leg?

3. What would be the strategic physical assessments after surgery to determine the adequacy of the patient’s circulation?

4. What would be the treatment of intermittent Claudication for non-occlusion?

The post Peripheral Vascular Disease appeared first on Infinite Essays.

PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to investigate smartphone and social media use in healthcare and to apply professional, ethical, and legal principles to their appropriate use in healthcare technology.

NR360 We Can But Dare We.docx Revised 5 ‐ 9 ‐ 16 DA/LS/psb 07.14.16 1

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

Required Uniform Assignment: We Can, but Dare We?

PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to investigate smartphone and social media use in healthcare and to

apply professional, ethical, and legal principles to their appropriate use in healthcare technology.

 

Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

• CO #4: Investigate safeguards and decision‐making support tools embedded in patient

care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for

both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)

 

• CO #6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal

requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and

client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

• CO #8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in the

delivery of nursing care (PO 8)

DUE DATE See Course Schedule in Syllabus. The college’s Late Assignment Policy applies to this activity.

 

TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE This assignment is worth a total of 240 points.

 

Requirements 1. Research, compose, and type a scholarly paper based on the scenario described below, and

choose a conclusion scenario to discuss within the body of your paper. Reflect on lessons

learned in this class about technology, privacy concerns, and legal and ethical issues and

addressed each of these concepts in the paper, reflecting on the use of smartphones and social

media in healthcare. Consider the consequences of such a scenario. Do not limit your review of

the literature to the nursing discipline only because other health professionals are using the

technology, and you may need to apply critical thinking skills to its applications in this scenario.

2. Use Microsoft Word and APA formatting. Consult your copy of the Publication Manual of the

American Psychological Association, sixth edition, as well as the resources in Doc Sharing if you

have questions (e.g., margin size, font type and size (point), use of third person, etc.). Take

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 We Can But Dare We.docx Revised 5 ‐ 9 ‐ 16 DA/LS/psb 07.14.16 2

advantage of the writing service SmartThinking, which is accessed by clicking on the link called

the Tutor Source, found under the Course Home area.

3. The length of the paper should be four to five pages, excluding the title page and the reference

page. Limit the references to a few key sources (minimum of three required).

4. The paper will contain an introduction that catches the attention of the reader, states the

purpose of the paper, and provides a narrative outline of what will follow (i.e., the assignment

criteria).

5. In the body of the paper, discuss the scenario in relation to HIPAA, legal, and other regulatory

requirements that apply to the scenario and the ending you chose. Demonstrate support from sources of evidence (references) included as in‐text citations.

6. Choose and identify one of the four possible endings provided for the scenario, and construct

your paper based on its implications to the scenario. Make recommendations about what should

have been done and what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the

scenario and the ending you chose. Demonstrate support from sources of evidence (references)

included as in‐text citations.

7. Present the advantages and disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare

and describe professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology, based

on facts from supporting sources of evidence, which must be included as in‐text citations.

8. The paper’s conclusion should summarize what you learned and make reflections about them to

your practice.

9. Use the “Directions and Assignment Criteria” and “Grading Rubric” below to guide your writing

and ensure that all components are complete.

 

10. Review the section on Academic Honesty found in the Chamberlain Course Policies. All work

must be original (in your own words). Papers will automatically be submitted to TurnItIn when

submitted to the Dropbox.

11. Submit the completed paper to the “We Can, but Dare We?” Dropbox by the end of Week 3.

Please refer to the Syllabus for due dates for this assignment. For online students, please post

questions about this assignment to the weekly Q & A Forums so that the entire class may view

the answers.

 

 

Preparing for the Assignment

BACKGROUND Healthcare is readily embracing any technology to improve patient outcomes, streamline operations,

and lower costs, but we must also consider the impact of such technology on privacy and patient care.

This technology includes the use of social media applications, such as Facebook, Instagram, MySpace,

Twitter, and LinkedIn on smartphones.

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 We Can But Dare We.docx Revised 5 ‐ 9 ‐ 16 DA/LS/psb 07.14.16 3

In healthcare today, smartphones are widely used for communication, efficiency, and care. Obviously, a

variety of issues (ethical, professional, and legal) from both the personal and hospital perspectives

must be considered. SCENARIO

You are a nurse in the emergency room, working the Friday 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift, and your evening has

been filled with the usual mix of drunken belligerent teens, wailing babies, chronic obstructive

pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, falls, fractures, and the routine, regular congestive heart

failure (CHF) patients. Your best friend is texting you from the concert that you had to miss tonight

because you were scheduled to work, and you respond to her between care of patients, jealous that she

is there and you are not. “What a jerk to torture me like this!” you think to yourself.

It is now 2 a.m., and the medics radio once again, notifying you of an incoming motor vehicle accident

victim, ETA of 5 minutes. You sigh and opt to use the restroom, rather than getting that much‐needed

cup of coffee, and prepare a room for your next patient. The medics roll in and begin to fill you in. The

patient is a 28‐year‐old male, a passenger on a bus that was involved in a crash, leaving the vehicle

overturned after rolling over an embankment. There were several fatalities among the bus passengers,

and “this victim has remained unconscious, though his vitals are currently” . . . and as you start to focus

on the patient, you take a second look. Can it be? It is! The lead singer, Jerod, from the band “Blue

Lizards,” who you have adored since you first heard his voice! The band had just left the concert that

you had missed last evening when the accident occurred. You quickly text your best friend . . . “Can you

believe?” and she responds with “Yeah, right. PROVE IT.” So you quickly snap a picture with your

smartphone, when alone with the patient, and send it to her. Can’t hurt, right? Celebrities are “public

property,” and that’s a part of their life, right? Just for good measure, you snap a few more pictures of

the unconscious singer in various stages of undress and then a shot of his home address, phone number,

and demographic information from his electronic health record. You sit your phone down on the

bedside table for a minute as you continue your assessment of the patient.

At 7:00 a.m., you drag your tired body home and straight to bed after a long but eventful night.

 

What happens next? Choose an ending to the scenario, and construct your paper based on those

reflections:

1. You are the following nurse on the day shift and discover the night nurse’s phone on the bedside

table. While trying to figure out to whom it belongs, you open the phone and see the

photographs taken the night before. Holy moly! What a find, and nobody could trace you to the

photos.

2. You receive a call from the gossip paper the Gossip Gazette, offering you $20,000 for the photos

you have taken (courtesy of your best friend). Your identity would never be revealed, and you

desperately need a new car and are behind on some bills.

3. You go on Facebook, on your day off, and talk about the night you had at work and how you

didn’t really feel as bad having to miss the concert, because you actually got to meet Jerod in

person and even “Got his number!” You then post a picture of Jerod on Facebook and

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 We Can But Dare We.docx Revised 5 ‐ 9 ‐ 16 DA/LS/psb 07.14.16 4

Instagram, figuring that most of your contacts would never recognize him anyway. It’s your day

off and your personal time, so no harm, no foul, right?

4. You receive a message the next morning from a peer at work that there is a big investigation

being conducted at work due to a HIPAA violation and that it involved a celebrity who had been

admitted to the hospital. The word is that legal action is being taken against the hospital due to

some photos that were sold to the Gossip Gazette. Knowing that the photo you sent is safe with

your best friend, you reach for your smartphone, but it is nowhere to be found.

 

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 We Can But Dare We.docx Revised 5 ‐ 9 ‐ 16 DA/LS/psb 07.14.16 5

Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria Points % Description

Introduction 40

points 40 17%

 

Catches the attention of the reader States

the purpose of the paper

Provides a narrative outline of the paper (i.e., the assignment criteria).

HIPAA, Legal, & Regulatory Discussion 40 points

40 17% Discussion the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare: o

HIPAA/regulatory requirements o Other legal requirements appropriate to the

use of this technology Demonstrate support from sources of evidence

included as in‐text citations.

Scenario Ending & Recommendations

50 points

 

50 21%

 

Choose and identify one of the four possible endings provided for the scenario. Make recommendations about what should have been

done and what could be done to correct or mitigate

the problems caused by the scenario and the ending

you chose. Demonstrate support from sources of evidence

included as in‐text citations.

Advantages and Disadvantages

50 points

50 21% Discuss at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media

in healthcare

Describe professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology

Demonstrate support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

Conclusion and Reflections

30 points 30 12%

 

Summarize what you learned Make reflections about lessons learned to your

practice.

Scholarly Writing and APA Format

30 points

30 12%

Title page, running head, & page numbers are correct.

Use Microsoft Word and APA (6th ed.) formatting Length is 4‐5 pages (excludes title & reference pages).

At least 3 references are used, listed in APA format

References match in text citations in APA format

Spelling, grammar, & mechanics are correct.

Total 240 100%

 

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 WECANBUTDAREWE Guidelines.docxRevised 05 /09/ 18 DA SME/psb 07.14.16 6

Grading Rubric

Assignment

Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

 

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of

Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory

Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or

Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F

(0–75%)

Introduction 40

points The student catches the reader’s attention, states the paper’s purpose, and provides a narrative outline of the paper’s body.

 

 

35–40 points

One of the following is missing or inadequate: attention‐catching statement(s), paper’s purpose, or a narrative outline of the paper’s body.

 

30–34 points

Two of the following are missing or inadequate: attention‐catching statement(s), paper’s purpose, or a narrative outline of the paper’s body.

 

26–29 points

Three of the following are missing or inadequate: attention‐catching statement(s), paper’s purpose, or a narrative outline of the paper’s body.

 

0–25 points

HIPAA, Legal, & Regulatory Discussion 40 points

The discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is thoroughly addressed:

• HIPAA/regulatory requirements

• Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology

Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.

35–40 points

The discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is lacking in one or more component:

• HIPAA/regulatory requirements

• Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology

or Support is not demonstrated adequately from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

30–34 points

The discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is lacking in one or more component:

• HIPAA/regulatory requirements

• Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology

and Support is not demonstrated adequately from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

26–29 points

The discussion of the following as they apply to the use of cellphones and social media in healthcare, is lacking both components: • HIPAA/regulatory requirements • Other legal requirements appropriate to the use of this technology

and Support is not demonstrated adequately from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

0–25 points

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 WECANBUTDAREWE Guidelines.docxRevised 05 /09/ 18 DA SME/psb 07.14.16 7

Scenario Ending & Recommendations

50 points

 

Included all of the following elements sufficiently: • Identify one of the four possible

endings provided for the scenario.

Included all of the following elements but did not develop at least one area substantively : • Identify one of the four possible

endings provided for the scenario.

Included all of the following

elements but did not develop at

two or more area substantively : •

Identify one of the four possible

endings provided for the scenario.

Did not included the following elements substantively : • Identify one of the four possible

endings provided for the scenario.

 

 

 

• Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.

 

45‐50 points

• Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. Or • Did not demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

40‐44 points

• Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. Or • Did not demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

36‐39 points

• Made recommendations about what should have been done. • Made recommendations about what could be done to correct or mitigate the problems caused by the scenario and the ending chosen. Or • Did not demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as in‐text citations.

 

0‐35 points

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 WECANBUTDAREWE Guidelines.docxRevised 05 /09/ 18 DA SME/psb 07.14.16 8

Advantages and Disadvantages

50 points

 

Met all of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.

45‐50 points

Did not meet one of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.

40‐44 points

Did not meet two or more of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.

36—39 points

Did not meet Three or more of the following criteria: • Discussed at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of using smartphones and social media in healthcare • Described professional and ethical principles to the appropriate use of this technology • Demonstrated support from sources of evidence included as intext citations.

0‐35 points

Conclusion and Reflections 30 points

Met the following criteria substantively: • Summarized what you learned • Made reflections about lessons learned to your practice.

25‐30 points

Did not meet at least one of the following criteria substantively: • Summarize what you learned • Make reflections about lessons learned to your practice.

20‐24 points

Did not meet either of the following criteria substantively: • Summarize what you learned • Make reflections about lessons learned to your practice.

16‐19 points

Did not include a formal conclusion paragraph

 

 

 

0–15 points

 

Scholarly Writing and APA Format

30 points

The following

points

• 6 points

are achieved by successful implementation of each scholarly writing/APA element:

Title page, running head, & page numbers are correct.

• 4 points Use Microsoft Word and APA (6th ed.) formatting

• 2 point Length is 4‐5 pages (excludes title & reference pages).

• 6 points At least 3 references are used, listed in APA format

• 6 points References match in text citations in APA format

 

 

NR360 INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

 

NR360 WECANBUTDAREWE Guidelines.docxRevised 05 /09/ 18 DA SME/psb 07.14.16 9

• 4 points Spelling/mechanics & grammar are correct.

• 2 point Scholarly writing style is used

Total Points Possible = /240 Points

The post PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to investigate smartphone and social media use in healthcare and to apply professional, ethical, and legal principles to their appropriate use in healthcare technology. appeared first on Infinite Essays.