Response Paper #2

Read: Haase, Donald Feminist fairy-tale scholarship, fairytales and feminism :new approaches, edited by Donald Haase, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2004, pp 1-36

And
Watch: Nicholas, Mike, director. Working Girl. Performances by Harrison Ford, Melanie Griffith, and Sigourney Weaver, USA, Twentieth Century Fox, 1988

Or
Watch: Marshall, Garry, director. Pretty Woman. Performances by Richard Gere and Julia Roberts, USA, Touchstone Pictures, 1990

Prompt: Pick two topics of concern to the field of feminist scholars summarized by Donald Haase. Apply these two concepts to either Garry Marshalls pretty women or Mike Nichols Working Girl (PLEASE DO NOT write on both films). Thinking of the affordable ( what something can and cannot do ) allowed by the fairytale genre, how can the movie be analyzed (I.e make arguments about) in terms of the two topics you could have chosen? Conversely, what limitations are there in using these topics to examine or make arguments about fairytale adaptations, such as Working Girl or Pretty Woman?
Make sure to define the two topics according to the essay and include brief, relevant quotes from the essay and the movie to support your arguments.

SCIENCE BRIEF

SCIENCE BRIEF

This section should be 2 pages in length. In it, summarize in your own words, and with your instructor in mind as the intended audience, the big ideas or concepts of science that are relevant for you as teacher to grasp and understanding fully in order to teach in an informed way.
Your brief should emphasize two things: (1) concepts and (2) practices or process skills. In this section, you will demonstrate that you yourself understand the science content underlying what you plan to teach. Be certain that your Science Brief is free of misconceptions about your topic.
Write your Science Brief in paragraph form, not as a series of bullets, with minimal use of quoted passages (those used must be cited). Do not describe the curriculum or its approaches here, nor your plans for how you will teach your learners, which writing in Section D, Lesson Plans.
Use high school textbooks, the web, and network with others to build this science understanding. Typically, this goes well beyond what you will be teaching to your young learners.
Your Science Brief should include:
(A)    Science Content Knowledge (no less than 1 page of the minimum 1.5 pages, or two thirds of the brief), and describe all relevant big ideas of science and practices underlying the entire curriculum module, with emphasis on the lessons you taught. Also briefly describe how the curriculums learning goals are linked to learning objectives found in the NYC PK-8 Science Scope & Sequence 2018, or NRCs Framework (2012), or Next Generation Science Standards (2013).
(B)    The intended grade level of your materials must be within two (2) grade levels of the standards chose.
(C)    (B) Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge — Here you describe what you learned from published educational research that you found about (a) specific misconceptions regarding your science topics to which students are prone, (2) suggestions or remedies for how to help learners overcome those misconceptions, and (3) learning progressions that describe how students evolve in their understanding of an idea.
Only include this write-up when such educational research is available. In other words, resist the temptation to make up misconceptions that you think kids may have. Cite sources at the end of this section. For example, if you were writing about the Ice Cube homework task that we did in class, your write up of relevant science would provide full space for you to articulate your understanding of heat transfer and the three main methods convection, conduction and radiation. You would not just list these ideas but give space to articulate your understanding of these ideas, and how they apply to the task at hand. Since the main process skill in Ice Cube task is designing a fair-test experiment, you would also describe the three questions of inquiry and how you answered them in planning the Ice Cube experiment.

Social Structure, Social Process, and Social Development Theory

Assignment Content

In this assignment, you have the opportunity to examine the theoretical principles associated with sociological perspectives of crime.

Watch Why They Kill from the University Library. This is a comprehensive overview of the criminal mind. To gain the most from this assignment, you are encouraged to watch the video in its entirety before you begin working on the assignment.

Select two of the following video segments:
Introduction: Why They Kill
“To Fully Appreciate the Outcome, One Must Experience the Process”
Did You Hear That?
Stage 1: Brutalization
Stage 2: Belligerency
Stage 3: Violent Performances
Stage 4: Virulency
Violentization Interrupted

Consider the following theories as they relate to the video segments you selected:
Social structure theories view societal, financial, and social arrangements or structures as the primary cause of deviant and criminal behaviors.
Social process theories view deviant and criminal behaviors as evolving mechanisms learned through societal interaction.
Social development theories view deviant and criminal behaviors as part of a maturational process.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you:
Summarize the subject or content of each video segment chosen.
Identify what major principles of sociological theory are addressed in the video.
Explain how each of the video segments you selected align with the three theories outlined above.
Explain what social issues are raised in the video based on the three theories.
Explain the role of sociological theories on crime causation on policy implementation.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Wells Fargo Scandal

After you have chosen a Case to analyze, you should read the summary thoroughly.  Discuss the key points and identify areas that are important to you.  Review the Sample Case Study Analysis in the Handouts section of the Main Page, and How to Prepare a Case in the Bookmark section of the Main Page.

Keep these key points in mind:

Good writing starts with an outline.  After making notes, organize your thoughts logically.
Your analysis should have three to four key points that are supported by research.  Each case has an extensive list of resources as its last part. Use this material and any outside material you wish.
Offer a solution or resolution to the problem presented and defend your proposal.
Do not forget to provide a summary conclusion.
You should provide a bibliography and in-text citation (APA format) for any outside resources used, including research materials provided by the case.