Effective Recruiting & Retention

PROBLEM: You have been directed by your corporate president to present your research- Creation and implementation of an effective recruiting and retention program to enhance the quality of employees and management within the organization – and prepare a formalized powerpoint presentation. This presentation should be addressed to the president & board of directors.

Prepare a powerpoint presentation based on the attached research in the attached outline paper.
This presentation should have an introduction page as well as a reference page at the end. 

There should be 10 slides that cover content. For a brief of this level to senior management, you should have no more than 25 words on each slide. Use bullet points or short phrases. Take full advantage of the notes section and remember to cite your sources.

GUIDELINES:
– Presentation presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
– Content reflects a high level of critical thinking; data is accurate and strongly supports the analysis/conclusion. Content was obtained from a variety of relevant resources and was properly cited. All issues are fully addressed. Presentation contained excellent examples which were linked to objective.
– Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
– PowerPoint presentation is professional and enhances the presentation.

‘Out of Africa’ by Thomas Friedman

in an essay of no more than 1,200 words (900-word minimum), you will write a rhetorical analysis of the essay, being sure to touch on the following:

1.) Identify the argument. What is the thesis of the essay? (It may be implied or explicit.)

2.) Identify the structure of the argument. How is Friedman presenting the parts of his argument?

3.) Examine the essay’s diction. Begin with word choice and then, looking at examples, dialogue, and sensory details determine what it is Friedman is wanting you to feel.

4.) Examine the tone. Friedman is a master at conveying his tone, and he will frequently change tones between pieces–and often, as we’ve seen, within the same piece. What tone is he seeking to strike?

5.)  Finally, refer back to Friedman’s argument as you identified in the first item. Does he make his argument? Or does his argument fall short?

Human Research Protection During this course, you will learn the components requ

Human Research Protection
During this course, you will learn the components required for a research study. Each week you will learn components of the research process through your readings and application of the knowledge gained to published research articles. 
During this week, you are expected to examine the protection of human subjects in research from early research studies, through the development of research codes to current research standards. The aim is to familiarize you with the ethical issues associated with research and gain firsthand information of the processes used to protect research participants.
Task:
View each of the You Tube clips listed below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz8ge4aw8Ws Caring Corrupted: The Killing Nurses of the Third Reich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O5gsF5oyls   Research Ethics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86zWBjDaXPk    Belmont Report Part 1 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIafASIIU70    Belmont Report Part 2 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFik0of3iUM    IRB   (Institutional Review Board)
After viewing each video, write two paragraphs about each video describing the purpose of the video and discussed one point from each video that you think is important regarding protecting human subjects in research and provided rationale. Your submission should be 400-500 words, using APA style.
Submission Details
Name your document as SU_NSG6101_W2_Project_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your certificate to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

The post Human Research Protection
During this course, you will learn the components requ
appeared first on homework handlers.

Please respond to the following: Part 1 Share a time when you provided feedback

Please respond to the following:
Part 1
Share a time when you provided feedback to someone (for example, informal colleague feedback after a meeting or presentation or formal feedback such as during a performance review).
How was it received?
What did you do well?
Knowing what you know now, how would you have improved it for a better result, relationship, or both?
Part 2
Share a time when someone provided you with feedback.
How did it make you feel and what was your response?
Knowing what you know now, would you have listened or responded differently?

The post Please respond to the following:
Part 1
Share a time when you provided feedback
appeared first on homework handlers.