In 1944, the Supreme Court upheld the authority of the U.S. government to order

In 1944, the Supreme Court upheld the authority of the U.S. government to order the internment of a minority group in the interest of national security, even though there was no evidence that any members of this group were disloyal to the United States. Should the same policy be applied today against U.S. Muslims or Muslim immigrants? Why or why not? Respond to at least 2 other students’ posts asa

The post In 1944, the Supreme Court upheld the authority of the U.S. government to order appeared first on homework handlers.

Final Exam In our midterm assignment, we looked at four investments and discusse

Final Exam
In our midterm assignment, we looked at four investments and discussed the types of investors who may or may not be appropriate for each selection. Now we will do the opposite by attempting to find appropriate investment selections for given individuals. Consider the following individuals:
· 65 year old widow with social security as only income and 300k retirement account.
· New small business owner at 28 with a 6 month emergency fund covered who is just starting to invest inside and outside retirement vehicles.
· Couple, both of whom are 45 with 12 year old daughter. Full time earners at 210k a year combined. 350k in retirement combined with emergency fund covered. Maxing 401k already. Willing and able to invest further outside of retirement funds.
· One individual or couple designed by the author whose personal situation differs from the three listed above.
The above scenarios are not “complete” pictures but are a good step in the process of completing topical financial plans. State a few investment products that may be appropriate as well as some that may not be as well as why this is the case. Consider at least one other area of financial planning (insurance, tax, estate planning, general topics, retirement planning) that may have an effect on investment decisions.
The successful submission will clearly and concisely describe suitable investments for the scenarios listed based on the limited information. (Consider that these “may” be appropriate since we do not have all client information at this time.) Focus on suitability rather than technical features of specific products.
The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:
Write between 1,250 – 1,750 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
Include cover page and reference page.
At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page APA style.
References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing. 

The post Final Exam
In our midterm assignment, we looked at four investments and discusse
appeared first on homework handlers.

Required Textbook: Hagan, Frank E., Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Cri

Required Textbook: Hagan, Frank E., Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology, Pearson Education,Inc., 2014. ISBN: 978-0-13-300861-6.
Use additional one to two verifiable sources.
Use APA Formatting
No Plagiarism
Review Questions for Chapter 3
See attachment for the questions

The post Required Textbook: Hagan, Frank E., Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Cri appeared first on homework handlers.

Read the following essays from CEL Ch. 8, Making Arguments, in preparation for t

Read the following essays from CEL Ch. 8, Making Arguments, in preparation for this discussion:
“The Dog Delusion” (Pedersen), CEL Ch. 8, p. 225-229.
“Cruelty, Civility, and Other Weighty Matters” (Paulin), p. 230-239
“Hive Talkin’: The Buzz around Town about Bees” (Scollon), p. 240-244.
After you have read all three essays, read the following questions and think about how you want to respond:
Of the three essays, which essay interested you the most? Why? For instance, was the topic closer to your own interests than the other essays? Did the writer manage to draw you in despite your lack of initial interest?
In Ch. 6, the CEL suggests that all writers write with “broad” and “specific” purposes in mind (170). For the essay that you found the most interesting, how do you imagine the writer developed a connection to the “broad purpose” of their topic (also list what that broad purpose is)? Is it clear that the writer already had a passion for the topic through personal experiences or relationships? 
What do you think the writer’s “specific purpose” is in writing? What do they hope to achieve, and is this hope stated directly? How does the writer’s intensity and passion for the topic show in their writing? 

The post Read the following essays from CEL Ch. 8, Making Arguments, in preparation for t appeared first on homework handlers.