Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies utilised in maximising the person’s independence.Included will be evidence of effective communication skills partnership working.

/in /by

Topic Question: Case Study of the patient that I have been looking after during my placement.The following are the diagnosis.Fournier Gangrene Scrotum,Carrier Of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococus,Diabetis Mellitus Type2,Ischemic Heart Diseases,Pulmonary Hypertension,Chronic Pain,Smoker.Allergies Atenolol,Below Knee Amputation.

Topic Description: Biographical Desription,of the client you have cared for.2.Outline the issues.3Critcally analyse how you plan to work with this client by evidence based practice and underpinning your decisions with relevant health and social care policies.4.Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies utilised in maximising the person’s independence.Included will be evidence of effective communication skills partnership working. Demonstrate use of relevant evidence based literature in an unbiased manner ,accurate referencing Harvard referencing system.

 

The post Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies utilised in maximising the person’s independence.Included will be evidence of effective communication skills partnership working. appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies utilised in maximising the person’s independence.Included will be evidence of effective communication skills partnership working. first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

write a discussion about the article below

/in /by

Read the paragraph below and write a discussion about it. At least 200 words.

Weitz, like Ludwig Wittgenstein, was on a mission to rid philosophy of theories, and by theory he meant the search for “necessary and sufficient” conditions for the application of concepts. The games business is the key to understanding Weitz, but I would caution you against reading his claims too “subjectively.” While it is correct to say that Weitz doesn’t think there can be a single definition of art because the various things we call “art” share only family resemblances (the way that checkers, baseball, solitaire, and hide-and-seek have some things in common but not others), and because standards (as you note well) change over time, it’s important to note that for Weitz (as for Wittgenstein before him) what determines what counts as art is something he refers to as a “language game.” Something is art if the community of competent language users say that it is. In short, for Weitz, something is art if “we” say that it is (then the interesting question is who “We” are). But since no one participates in a language game all alone, what counts as art can’t be a matter for individual judgment. We may not be able to define it, but it is “we” who determine what will count and what won’t. Theory can’t give us a definition in this regard, but it can be very useful in offering us suggestions about the kinds of things that we may think are important features of art. You could put it all this way: I can’t define “game,” but I know that checkers is a game and brain surgery is not, and not because that’s just my opinion, but because of how “we” use those words and concepts. Similarly, I can’t define “art,” but I know that the Mona Lisa is art, and the Stop Sign on the street corner is not. That’s the general idea, at any rate. For Weitz, then, aesthetics should be concerned with the question “What is our concept of art?” and NOT the question “What is the nature of art?” He writes: “’Art’ itself is an open concept…the very expansive, adventurous character of art, its ever-present changes and novel creations, makes it logically impossible to ensure any set of defining properties” (413).

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post write a discussion about the article below first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

Data collection and analysis are important parts of the improvement process. Org

/in /by

Data collection and analysis are important parts of the improvement process. Organizational leaders must be able to read and interpret the results of the data analysis to determine what areas to focus on when developing an improvement plan.
For this assignment, you have been provided with a set of survey data from a large learning organization. The purpose of this survey was to evaluate organizational culture. Begin by creating a visual representation of the data, such as a chart or graph. Study the results carefully and determine areas to address in the improvement process. Answer the following questions:
Areas of strength. What data support this?
Areas in need of improvement. What data support this?
What additional data might you need to make an informed decision? How will you collect them?
Length: 2-3 pages, plus a visual representation (e.g., chart, graph)
References: No references required, though any resources used should be cited
Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

The post Data collection and analysis are important parts of the improvement process. Org appeared first on homework handlers.

Each individual will submit their own idea for an innovation along with a model

/in /by

Each individual will submit their own idea for an innovation along with a model they find useful for evaluating its merits. Each team member is responsible for completing research on various models. While there are several models in circulation for evaluating innovations, such as The Lean StartUp Plan, NOMMAR, SNIFF, and the linear and mental models of innovation, innovators should not feel constrained by any particular model. Feel free to borrow elements from multiple models to develop one that would work best to most effectively evaluate your own innovation.
Teams will then review all of the submissions and choose the most promising idea to pursue. The idea should be selected by application of one of the evaluation models submitted by team members. You will then write a report of 1,500-2,500 words that describes the team’s selection process and identifies the final choice. The report must contain the following components:
A one- or two-paragraph summary of each team member’s idea, a description of the model used to evaluate the idea, and the results of the evaluation. Specifically, the evaluation should identify the merits, drawbacks, and challenges associated with the idea.
Identification of the selected idea for the project accompanied by a description of the model used to evaluate the idea. Include the results of the evaluation, which will serve as the justification for the team’s selection. Preliminarily forecast the most significant challenges that could impede the development of the selected idea.
A project plan that summarizes the roles or tasks assigned to each team member that must be accomplished to complete Phase 2 of the project due in Module 6.
In-text citations from at least five reputable secondary sources. Each person on the team must contribute an article from the research that was completed on innovation implementation/evaluation models.

The post Each individual will submit their own idea for an innovation along with a model appeared first on homework handlers.