The granddaughters of Adolphe and Suzanne Stoclet have debated over the fate of the Palais Stoclet – whether to sell it (and strip the contents), write about them or keep it closed and in the family’s possession.
What are your thoughts? There are pro’s and con’s for all sides. Take a side and support it.
Make sure it meets the Grading Criteria:
Purpose (5 points)
o The paper should clearly identify a research topic and a thesis that provides direction for the paper that is engaging and thought provoking, The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the paper.
Analysis (5 points)
o The paper should demonstrate a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). It should compare/contrasts perspectives, consider counter arguments or opposing positions, and draw original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications for individuals, families, communities and/or service providers.
Evidence (5 points)
o Students should provide compelling and accurate evidence to support the topic of choice. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, and reliable and add to the strength of the paper; and are effectively referenced and cited throughout the paper.
Organization (5 points)
o Paper needs to be effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flow smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position.
Writing Quality (2.5 points)
o Paper is expected to be well-written and clear, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage and formatting errors.
APA Formatting and Assignment Expectations (2.5 points)
o Paper should be in proper APA formatting with at least 6 references, a Title Page and Reference page in APA format.
1) Is the morally right thing to do always that thing which will increase general happiness? Mill vs. Kant
2) Are you free, right now, to do anything but read to the end of this sentence? Can it be fair to blame people for what they must necessarily do? Kane vs. Sartre
3) Can it be moral to break a law that you consider to be unjust? Plato vs. King
4) Can civil war be a war of art? Tolstoy vs. Hume
5) Are scientific revolutions cumulative or incommensurable? Popper vs. Kuhn
Choose one from the listed topics and compare and contrast as well as include own thoughts.
Write a brief on the Riley v. CaliforniaPreview the document Supreme Court case. The brief should be at least
3 pages in length. Your brief should set forth the facts of the case, the main issue before the Court, the
decision of the Court, the reasons for the decision, the position of the concurring or dissenting opinions, and
finally, your position on whether the Court made the correct decision.
The brief will be graded on the understanding of the issue set forth in the case and the reasoning of the opinions, both majority and dissenting. It will not be graded on whether I agree with your position on the case, but whether you have stated the issue and provided a basis for your opinion of the decision.
Sample Solution
The post Riley v.s California appeared first on homework handlers.
We are experienced and have access to ample research materials to guarantee quality A+ papers. Our Professional Writers can handle all subjects and deliver your papers on time.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Send us an E-mail: support@homeworkhandlers.com or Call us: +1 (518)-934-6741
