Iconic NYC assignment

/in /by

Locate and identify a place or structure that you feel is quintessentially iconic of New York. In other words, if I were from another planet, what is the one place/thing that you would show me that would reveal the essential qualities of New York?  You will, of course, need to explain what you feel are the essential qualities of New York.  You may use references from any of the class discussions we have had, or from any of the events in the City and Humanities Program as tools to help you develop your papers.  Write a 3-5 page paper in which you will uncover the unique qualities of your selection.  Your paper will address the following:

-historical information about the item

– purpose of the item

-perceptions of the item (how is it viewed by others)

-Your reasons for the selection (Explain why you consider this item iconic of New York City)

-Does your selection challenges or uphold any of Elizabeth Currids ideas in your textbook book, The Warhol Economy: how Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City?

The paper must be written using the MLA format for writing research papers.  Additionally, use the resources found in Writing Guidelines on Blackboard, and the library website for the proper usage of the MLA format.

need-done-tonight-by-10

/in /by

Criminal Investigation

Understanding the history and basics of criminal investigation is the first step to understanding the more complex topics to come. Create a 3-slide PowerPoint® presentation addressing the following topics. Be sure to follow APA format and style and use at least one reliable resource.

  • Define criminal investigation and list all of the elements of criminal investigation.
  • Define and describe jurisdiction and its importance.
  • Describe three or more attributes of a successful investigator.

Directions:

  • Your 3-slide requirement is excluding your introduction and reference slides.
  • Use one basic slide design and layout.
  • Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content.
  • Use bullets for your main points.

Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience

 

ORDER THIS PAPER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH TERM PAPER TUTORS AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Statement of purpose for graduate school

/in /by

I am applying for graduate school at Umass Lowell; masters degree in business administration.

Personal goal is that I would like to become an account executive in the fashion business.

Here are the instructions from the school

Statement of Purpose
In a separate document, submit a brief statement indicating your immediate and long-range goals, relevant work history, academic honors/awards received, any teaching experience and/or research conducted/published that may be pertinent to your graduate program. Two page recommended maximum.

Attatched is my resume. Would you be able to please do this kind of assignment? Thank you.

Just to add to the story I was already back in school for a second accelerated bachelors degree in nursing but it was not a good fit for me. I am now trying to acquire my passions.

see-the-questions-in-the-requirements-detail

/in /by

Write an essay for each questions, so the total will be two essays.

Write in your opinion “NO OUT SOURCE” do not write sources

The first question should be longer essay

(First question)

Consider the crimes of rape, pedophilia, or torture (non-consensual) for sexual gratification. Are such acts wrong

in themselves or by their consequences? If so, can you square the wrongness of these acts with moral relativism?

Consider such crimes from a subjectivist point of view, then a conventionalist point of view. Can either form of moral

relativism square with the belief that such acts are objectively wrong? Consider such acts from the standpoint of

Gilbert Harmon: whether rape e.g. is wrong depends of the “agreements of particular groups”. So, e.g. rape is

wrong in one group, but under the agreement of another group it’s maybe ok. So, if you were a member of a group

who believed that rape is wrong, but visited a group that believes it is ok, would you commit rape among that

people? Put differently, if it is morally permissible for one group to do an action, and no standards exist beyond what

different groups happen to believe, then why shouldn’t you feel free to try it? After all, how can you criticize their

view simply because it is different? Can your choice to try it, be defended in a non-circular way, or a way that does

commit you to a contradiction as soon as you act? How would Hospers handle such actions? How might Pojman?

(Second question)

Consider the principle of reciprocity, which we have found in every moral philosophy that we have studied this

term except for Harmon. Assume that this principle is merely relative, and not as Pojman claims, objectively

binding. Imagine explaining how a human society anywhere, could function without the principle of reciprocity.

Does such a society exist? Could it exist? Explain.

 

ORDER THIS PAPER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH TERM PAPER TUTORS AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”