Review One of these Articles

/in /by

Format
Two pages (minimum)
12 point font
Double spaced
Paragraphs

Paper should include the following:
The authors purpose in writing the article
The authors main thesis
The authors challenging of other historical viewpoints
The evidence utilized by the author (specifically primary sources)
Personal likes/dislikes
How could the author make the work stronger?
The recommended audience for the article?
Explain how this article contributes to understanding the history of the United States
An example of how this article supports/contradicts Eric Foners Give Me Liberty
Suggested reading to accompany this work (not required, but helpful)

Shakespeare’s Othello

/in /by

We have to come up with our own research question, based from Shakespeare’s play Othello. We then need to use examples from the play to prove our point(whether we agree or disagree with what we stated in the topic sentence). We also need 6 online sources that strengthen the point we are trying to prove.  I was trying to describe the relationship between Othello and Desdemona, if they truly loved one another. Not sure if that is a good topic though, I am open to other ideas.

Managing Change

/in /by

Review the case study below and prepare a report detailing how you would advise Meg to solve the management problems detailed. Remember you can draw on any/all of the topics studied in this module. Your report should follow standard report format and be accurately referenced. Your report should include the following points as a minimum:

a. Identification of the management problems
b. Discussion of potential solutions to the problem
c. Implementation plan for the chosen solution
d. Justification of this choice
e. Scope for further research

Please note that your report should focus upon the people issues, in relationship to change and leadership management, within the organisation rather than a consideration of global strategy.

Case Study Link: https://www.my-course.co.uk/pluginfile.php/400252/mod_assign/intro/End%20of%20Module%20Assignment%20Case%20Study.pdf

Assignment Guide: https://kaplanopenlearning.zoom.us/rec/play/tMF_d-2rpz03HIDAsASDV_NwW9XoKaqsgSAe-vNezEy9UCYBO1emNbYSZOGYdDyEwOEH4n2VD1o2Gei5?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=YifHkF9wQU6Z_gmuwe_Vaw.1587417159217.1e4024aeeab52f815b49726051a7e216&_x_zm_rhtaid=478

Legal issues in constructions

/in /by

The new Code of Civil Procedure (the “CCP”) that came into force on January 1st, 2016, brought significant changes to the rules relating to expert evidence. First and foremost, the CCP codified, as evidenced by article 22 CCP, the principle that an expert’s primary mission is to enlighten the Court’s understanding of complex issues rather than representing one party or the other:
Article 22. The mission of an expert whose services have been retained by a single party or by the parties jointly or who has been appointed by the court, whether the
the matter is contentious or not, is to enlighten the court. This mission overrides the parties’ interests.
Moreover, the new Code provides for an enhanced system of checks and balances with respect to expert witnesses. Consistent with existing case law and the guiding principle of expert testimony set out at article 22 CCP, the new Code now expressly qualifies the expert’s bias as sufficient ground for dismissal of the expert’s report even before trial.

Why is this important? How can it be helpful to a case? How can it be helpful to the Court?