social anxiety

Overview
    This assignment involves writing a research paper about any one major category of psychological disorder (e.g., mood, substance abuse, psychosis, developmental, anxiety, etc.).  Within this major category (e.g., anxiety disorders), one will select one (and only one) specific disorder to detail (e.g., simple phobia; not simple phobia, plus social anxiety and generalized anxiety disorder).  Please note that one is to research a topic using the course textbook and then offer materials from the text ones opinion is not being sought.  Opinion may be offered, of course, but done sparingly and on a very secondary level.
   
Technical Standards
The paper needs to conform to the following standards:
    Paper Structure Headings (Bold) and Sections:
o    Abstract (separate page)
o    Introduction
o    Psychological Disorder
    Diagnostic Category
    DSM-5 Criteria
    Cause(s) of Disorder
    Course of Disorder
    Treatments for Disorder
o    Conclusion

    Include a Title/Cover Page: PSYC270, Dysfunction, Student Name, Instructor Name, and Spring 2020 you may, or may not, include a Running Head.

    Paginate in header and/or footer (this will not take up text space).

    Must be Typed at least 10 full pages (not counting Title or Reference pages) SHORT assignments will be penalized see attached grading rubric.

    Double-spaced no extra spacing between paragraphs or around headings.

    Use 12-point font (i.e., Times New Roman).

    Use 1 margins (standard/default setting) for all text.

    Use the course textbook and at least one other academic source (i.e., textbook or journal article).  USE NO MAGAZINES, DICTIONARIES, ENCYCLOPEDIAS, OR WEBSITES!

    Use of APA style * Use the 6th (newest) edition of the APA Manual (2010) and see:
Crediting Sources on pp. 169-192 (especially When to Cite on pp. 169-170, Quoting and Paraphrasing on pp. 170-174, Citing Referencing in Text on pp. 174-179, and Reference List on p. 180), and Reference Examples on pp. 193-224 (especially the first part of Books, Reference Books, and Book Chapters on p. 202).  NOTE: The full-reference for the APA manual is:

Website Build (Template Starting Point Provided)

Create two more pages (a faux shop and a faux cart) for the website provided. You have been given a .psd wireframe with three artboards. Each artboard represents one
page of the website. With the home page already provided as a starting point, you will create a three-page fixed-width website.

(Detailed instructions provided in folder)

Previous Case

I had a look at your draft assignment and it looks good. Double check what you put down for the Pilon case as I think in that case, the small claims decision was upheld but I think the last line of that section says that it should remain with the family court. Please make corrections.

I hope this finds you well.

Pilon v. Lavine, 2016 Case Brief
Full Title: Pilon v. Lavine, 2016 ONSC 1965 (Div. Ct.)
Court: Division Courts.

Procedural History
The case involved a $12,000 debt following a divorce between Lavine and Pilon. According to the plaintiff, before their separation Lavine had offered the loan to Pilon and wanted the settlement of the loan to be part of the separation agreement. The loan payment therefore had to do with the settlement of the outstanding properties and debts and thus applied much to either the small claims debts or property litigations or in the higher courts levels of hearing the case. While the claimant maintains that she wants to hear the case in the small claims court, the defendant is pleading to keep the case in the family court. The judgment of the case should therefore depend on whether the court will find that the transaction was within the contexts of family law relations and not in the claims court or the other way around.
Issue
The main issue was whether the small claims court was the appropriate place for hearing the case. Essentially, the decision would highly depend on the nature of the claim and the nature of the transaction or agreement between the parties during the exchange.
Holding
The main points of contention have to do with the fact that if the case is to be heard in the family law relationship, then it means that the defendant is absolved of the debts and will only pay half of the amount since they are supposed to share the credit under the regulation. On the other hand, if the case is to be heard under the simple claims courts, it means that there was a business transaction and the defendant will be liable under the informal contract in the exchange to make a refund of the money. The hearing will therefore involve defining the nature of the exchange during the time of the exchange and determining whether the nature of the transaction would lead to a binding contract. Contexts that would leave the defendant free with no further arguing of the case include instances, where, for example, the plaintiff may have given the amount as a gift or a similar case.
Rules
The loan agreement and the nature of the transaction will determine how the defendant should pay back and the amounts that he should pay
The court will determine the existence of the loan agreement and the boundaries of the payment schedules and nature of the payment transactions
Reasoning
The main reasoning in the case has to do with the Uniform Marital Property Act that emerged in 1983 to define the way that the family should handle property and wealth during divorce and separation. Accordingly, the case suggests that there was a pending debt during the relationship that had to be arbitrated at the time of the separation. The court is to make a decision whether or not the debt qualifies in the case considering that the couple is separated and each individual is leading their own lives. The legal notion is that if the debt belonged to an asset that the couple shared then it would be judged under the family law relationship and both the defendant and Lavine will have to repay the debt.
Facts
Lavine and Pilon are separating from a marital relationship and have to mitigate the separation of properties and debts among the couple
According to the financial history, Pilon owed Lavine a sum of $24,000 of which Pilon payed half the amount as per the payment schedules of the loan agreement
At the end of the relationship, Pilon still owed the plaintiff $12,000 which Lavine requested to be settled as a small claims settlement.
The court found that the loan, which was evidenced by the agreement and payment schedule still fell under the family law relationship and would be heard as such since they were contingent to the contexts of marriage between the two.

3 program sets

Question Set 1 (10 part class modification):
1. Simple Linked List Class
Using an appropriate definition of ListNode, design a simple linked list class with only
two member functions and a default constructor:

void add(double x);
boolean isMember(double x);
Linkedlist ( ) ;

The add function adds a new node containing x to the front (head ) of the list, while the
isMember function tests to see if the list contains a node with the value x. Test your
linked list class by adding various numbers to the list and then testing for membership.

Do not create your own linked list template. Instead, use the List from the STL to perform the actions described in the text requirements.  Use an InventoryItem class as the objects to populate your list.

2. List Copy Constructor
Modify your list class of Programming Challenge 1 to add a copy constructor. Test
your class by making a copy of a list and then testing membership on the copy.

3. List Print
Modify the list class you created in the previous programming challenges to add a
print member function . Test the class by starting with an empty list, adding some
elements, and then printing the resulting list out .

4. Recursive Member Check
Modify the list class you created in the previous programming challenges to use a
recursive method to check for list membership. Test your class.

5. List Member Deletion
Modify the list class you created in the previous programming challenges by adding a
function to remove an item from the list and by adding a destructor:

void remove(double x);
– Linkedlist() ;
Test the class by adding a sequence of instructions that mixes operations for adding
items, removing items, and printing the list.

6. List Reverse
Modify the list class you created in the previous programming challenges by adding a
member function for reversing the list:

void reverse();
The member function rearranges the nodes in the list so that their order is reversed.
You should do this without creating or destroying nodes.

7. List Search
Modify the list class of Programming Challenge 1 (or later) to include a member function

int search(double x)
that returns the position of a number x on the list. The first node in the list is at position 0,
the second node is at position 1, and so on. If x is not found on the list, the search should
return -1. Test the new member function using an appropriate driver program.

8. Member Insertion By Position
Modify the list class you created in the previous programming challenges by adding a
member function for inserting a new item at a specified position:

void insert(double x, int pos);
A position of O means that x will become the first item on the list, a position of 1 means
that x will become the second item on the list, and so on. A position equal to, or greater
than, the length of the list means that the x is placed at the end of the list.

9. Member Removal by Position
Modify the list class you created in the previous programming challenges by adding a
member function for deleting a node at a specified position:
void remove(int pos);
A value of O for the position means that the first node on the list (the current head ) is
deleted. The function does nothing if the value passed for pos is greater than or equal
to the length of the list.

Question Set 2:
Modify the uploaded source file to include a Linked List of objects with the class Tips.

Question Set 3:
Picture of the problem is uploaded.

Please include as many explanatory comments as possible.

Ask for any textbook standards if needed.