Module 2 SLP: Cost analysis of VA medical care vs. Private care

Using your work from the previous weeks, prepare and submit Chapter Three. You must insert your material into the DSP template (found in MyTLC). Work will not be accepted if it is not in the template.

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS (IMPORTANT ELEMENTS *DRAFT*)

The methods are the procedures used to acquire empirical evidence and analyze it for purposes of answering research questions, testing hypotheses, and examining foreshadowed problems, following up on conjectures, and going forward from exploratory questions. The choice of methodology should be made in light of the literature review and with careful deliberation. Small oversights can sometimes undermine a long and difficult study. Your committee will help you think through the appropriateness of proposed methods and will probably suggest some refinements.

Your approved proposal is considered a blueprint for research. You are expected to do everything indicated in that blueprint. In experimental research, it is usually expected that no changes will be made unless you encounter unanticipated problems that require modifications. In other quantitative research, such as quasi-experimental, longitudinal and secondary data analysis, additions over and beyond the blueprint may be appropriate to deal with unanticipated opportunities. In qualitative research, the proposal outlines the broad parameters of the study, but usually several details are expected to be decided during the actual data collection and analysis. Changes in the planned research should be made only after consultation with your full dissertation committee. Changes in the collection and handling of data from humans will generally require re-submission for IRB approval.

A few important aspects of the methods cannot be known until after the study has been conducted, such as the response rates from samples, errors or accidents in carrying out the planned methods, and whether the collected data meets the assumptions of the planned statistical analyses. Consequently, whatever is written in the research proposal about methodology may have to be updated some when preparing Chapter 3 of the dissertation.

The subsections indicated below are the components of the methodology and not necessarily subheadings of Chapter 3. Mixed-methods studies may benefit from the guidelines below for both quantitative research and qualitative research.

3-A. Methodology:

Briefly re-introduce the problem and provide an overview of the methodological approach.

3-B. Conjectures, or Exploratory Questions:

State the conjectures, or exploratory questions that guided the inquiry. The conjectures or exploratory questions can be descriptive, associational, and causal. Qualitative research answers questions in a holistic manner based on all or most of the available information, cross-verifying among several sources of information. The process often involves continual drawing of tentative inferences throughout the ongoing data collection and verifying those inferences with the subsequently-collected data.

3-C. Research Procedures:

Describe in detail how the inquiry was undertaken.

Generally, the description should be thorough enough that other skilled researchers could approximately replicate your study from the description.

    Introduce the epistemology that will guide the inquiry.
    Explain the theoretical perspective that will drive the research, and why it was selected.
    Indicate the methodology used and why it was selected.
    Indicate the specific methods used and the justification for them. How were sites, cases, and informants selected? Why? What access did you unsuccessfully seek? Which people perhaps tried to minimize contact with you and which repeatedly sought it out? How did you collect your data? Why?
    What verification procedures were used in the field? How did you protect against imposing your biases on the data? Describe and append any interview guides, protocols, rubrics used to assist in the data collection.
    Indicate how you managed your qualitative data. Did you take notes or make audio/video recordings? Was any data not analyzed? Why?
    Indicate how you analyzed and interpreted your data, making sure the analysis was consistent with the selected methodology. If you inferred themes, explain how. If you coded the transcripts, explain the coding system and checks for coding reliability and validity. How did you analyze the data from the coding? How did you triangulate or otherwise verify findings? How did you interpret the full set of data?

3-D. Human Participants and Ethics Precautions:

Summarize potential risks to humans from whom data is collected in your research, and summarize precautions taken to ensure informed consent (when needed) and to minimize the risks to participants in your research. This information can be drawn from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs – Institutional Review Board (IRB) Submission Form that must accompany your proposal when it is submitted for review and approval. (Reminder: You must have approval from the Institutional Review Board before beginning data collection from or about humans!) Also address other ethical issues, such as your possible conflicts of interest and personal biases that could have influenced the research, and how you minimized their effects. After receiving IRB approval, participant recruitment and data collection will begin.

Interpersonal Conflict

Elements of Conflict-  This short paper is designed to (1) further your understanding of Wilmot and Hockers definition of conflict, (2) help you analyze these concepts in a real-life conflict, and (3) improve your competency in managing a conflict.
Process
First, identify a conflict that you have personally experienced recently or in the past.
Analyze your perception of the conflict using the definition provided in Chapter 1.
Expressed struggle: How was the conflict expressed? How often? Verbally? Nonverbally? Overtly? Covertly?
Interdependent parties: What binds you and the other person in the conflict together? In what ways do you need the other person? In what ways does he or she need you?
Perceived incompatible goals: What are you not getting from the other person in the conflict? What is the other person not getting from you?
Perceived scarce resources: Examples for these resources are time, money, affection, inclusion, etc.
Perceived interference from others in achieving those goals: In what ways are you interfering with the other persons goals? How is the other person interfering with your goals?
Analyze the other persons view using the five elements of a conflict. You can do this by (a) directly asking the other person in the conflict or by (b) making your best guess about how he or she views the conflict.
Write a three- to four-page paper (typed, double-spaced) in which you address the points given below.
Summarize both your view and the other persons view of the conflict.
Identify areas in which you and the other person could improve on to manage the conflict better.
Discuss the role of ones perception in the conflict.
Reflect on what you have learned by completing this process.
Reflect on what you have learned about this specific relationship and relationship enhancement in general.
FOR NURSES PREFERABLY

Energy Policy in Local Government

The Role of Local Government:
1.How is the policy role of local government different than state or federal governments? 
-Briefly discuss what are the best practices in local government in terms of alternative energy policy?
-Can more meaningful change happen at the local level? How can local leaders be convinced to pursue renewable energy reform – especially when it can be very costly?

2. Local Government in Central Florida:

-Summarize what is occurring at a local level in terms of alternative energy.
-Does Orlando Florida have any policies that encourage alternative energy? (this can be helpful: http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program?state=FL (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)
-What overall impact does or could Central Florida governments have on encouraging alternative energy? Other conclusions?

Proposing a Counselor or Psychotherapy Group

Imagine you are working in a community agency and would like to offer a counseling or psychotherapy group. A survey of clients revealed that there is a community needs to address the following group topics:

Traumatic loss and bereavement.
Management of anger and impulse issues.
At-risk behaviors for youth.
Intimate partner violence.
Eating disorders.
Select one topic and focus on a specific population impacted. For example, you may identify age, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnicity that group members may have in common in addition to the focus of the group. As a first step to propose the group to your supervisor, you will analyze the current group literature to provide a rationale for offering either a counseling or psychotherapy group. Please note that a psychoeducational group does not meet the requirements for the assignments in this course.

We will assume that your supervisor is looking for you to carefully study what has already been written about similar groups before you develop any specific plans for the proposed group. Utilize the Unit 3 Assignment Paper Template for this assignment and review the scoring guide.

Locate peer-reviewed articles published within the past seven years from professional journals that present a range of group counseling approaches for your topic. Compare the sources based on the strength of the group leadership approach and specific counseling theories presented. Present a clear analysis of how specific ethical and diversity issues will be relevant to the proposed group citing the relevant ethical standards.

Submission Requirements
Your paper should meet the following requirements:

Written communication: Written communication must be grammatically correct and free of errors that detract from the overall message. Writing should be consistent with graduate-level scholarship.
APA formatting: Title page, main body, and references should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
The number of resources: Minimum of six scholarly resources. Distinguished submissions typically exceed this minimum.
Length of paper: 57 typed, double-spaced pages. Abstract and Table of Contents are not necessary.
Font: Times New Roman, 12 points.