Instructions
Mini Case Study on International Crisis
In 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait, claiming that Kuwait was stealing oil from an oil field that straddled the IraqKuwait border and that the territory of Kuwait had historically been a province of Iraq. Iraq quickly overran
Kuwait, which was much smaller and militarily weaker than Iraq. Once Iraq had taken over Kuwait, it
destroyed property records and other important documents, as if to eradicate the legal vestiges of the
Kuwaiti government. Iraq also postured in a way that was widely viewed as threatening Saudi Arabia, home
to the most important oil fields in the world.
In 1991, the United Nations Security Council authorized military action to evict Iraq, and a multinational
force with 34 members states soon evicted Iraq from Kuwait and restored the Kuwaiti government. The
League of Arab States also approved of military action to reverse the invasion of Kuwait; both Iraq and
Kuwait were (and still are) members of the league, and a number of Arab states participated in the military
action.
Under the terms of the 1991 ceasefire after the restoration of the Kuwaiti government, Iraq pledged to
dismantle its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. It was widely believed that Iraq was
developing nuclear weapons. Furthermore, it was documented by the UN that Iraq had actually used
chemical WMDs against Iranian troops during the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s and against a minority
population in Iraq in 1988. In response to Iraq’s noncompliance with
the commitments it made in the 1991 ceasefire, the UN authorized economic sanctions against it. Despite
the sanctions, Iraq continued to defy the UN inspectors who were responsible for checking on Iraq’s
progress in dismantling its WMD programs, and relations between Iraq and the United States reached a
critical level.
In part, this may have been a reaction on the part of the United States to the September 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks on New York City and the Pentagon. Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks, but the attacks
heightened the concerns of US leaders about the dangers of nuclear weaponry in the hands of adversaries.
Convinced that Iraq was developing WMDs, the United States raised its concerns at the UN, but did not
request Security Council authorization for military action against Iraq to enforce the WMD terms of the 1991
ceasefire. UN authorization may not have been requested because the United States knew that the Security
Council would not authorize the action; five members of the Security Council have veto power, which is to
say any one of them could have prevented the authorization from being passed. The United States claimed
that a UN authorization was not necessary because the 1991 ceasefire agreement provided the necessary
authority; this view was not widely shared. In 2003, the United States and several allies (the United
Kingdom, Australia, and Poland) invaded Iraq to enforce the WMD provisions of the ceasefire, but even
after defeating Iraqi military forces, no WMDs were found.
Setting aside your personal views of the Iraq War and its aftermath of violence, compare and contrast the
1991 and 2003 military actions with respect to the roles of the United States, the United Nations, and other
states.

Sample Solution

The post The 1990 and 2003 Iraq Wars appeared first on homework handlers.

You are required to answer a series of questions which are related to the following:

1. System development methods
2. Feasibility study – SWOT analysis, Cost-benefit Analysis, Return On Investment
3. Stakeholders
4. Fact-finding techniques.

• Use a generalised model of an information system (IS) to analyse, identify and
  effectively describe the components of a simple real-life information system
• Describe the Systems Development Life Cycle approach to developing IS

Sample Solution

The post Systems Development Life Cycle appeared first on homework handlers.