Robots

  -Basic Requirements:
Length – at least 3000 words * (NB. The word count does not include the References)
Support at least 3 sources taken from the text book *
Sufficient research and support from other sources (a minimum of 4 credible, external sources) *
References page presented in APA style (alphabetical order by authors surname, title & publishing
information) *
APA layout, including course information (semester, teacher etc. aligned to the left) on the title page
Pages: double spaced and numbered (the page number and title should be included in header on each page)
RP stapled or bound no loose pages

  -Argumentative style: Four- part introduction (G.O.S. Thesis, Alternative View, Road map)
Development of alternative view (concession & refutation)
Well supported arguments
Credible sources (support based on research articles or books, no French sources and no Wikipedia) *
Acknowledge all sources (all ideas that are not your own must be acknowledged) both in the paper & in the
references page)

  -Development
Every idea you present must be backed up with reference to your researched sources authors name & date
Direct quotes should make up no more than 10% of your overall paper.*
Each paragraph is developed using examples and references to sources
No sweeping generalizations (e.g. Advertisements tell lies)

Reproductive justice

This assignment is a combination of “Parenting and Reproductive Justice” and “Girlhood & Boyhood”.  In addition to “Moonlight” (Kanopy), watch “The History of Reproductive Justice” and answer the following questions.  Answers should be substantial and pull in the readings from both sections.

1. What are the intersectional factors at play in Chiron’s life, how is life made more difficult for him due to these factors?

2. How does Chiron’s life connect to a re(imaging) of black boyhood?

3. How does the United States “manage fertility” and how does this specifically affect marginalized communities? (May need to conduct outside research)

4. Provide one option that can contribute to a reproductive justice agenda:

-“Parenting and Reproductive Justice” + “Girlhood & Boyhood” , reading files attached
-“The History of Reproductive Justice”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihwvHHInrlU&feature=emb_logo

explain VLO is simple understanding language

Explain what your VLO (vocational learning outcome) means in simple, easy to understand language.

1. Work from an anti-oppressive,strengths-based practice,recognizing the capacity for resilience and growth of individuals and communities when responding to the diverse needs of marginalized or vulnerable populations to act as allies and advocates.

2. Work with individuals, groups, families and their communities to ensure that service provider strategies promote social and economic justice, and challenge patterns of oppression, discrimination and harassment, and sexual violence with clients, coworkers and communities.

Combine these two and write a 200-250 paragraph, exampaining this VLO’s in a easier, much understanding way. Basically “paraphrasing” to have these two easily understood.

Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

For this assessment, you will use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis of a quality or safety issue in a health care setting of your choice and outline a plan to address the issue.

As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse’s role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other health care professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.

As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.

Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address a safety issue or sentinel event.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.
Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event within an organization.
Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
Identify existing organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve a plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Professional Context
Nursing practice is governed by health care policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.

Scenario
For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan:

The specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment.
The Vila Health: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Planning simulation.
One of the case studies from the previous assessment.
A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.
Instructions
The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze a root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the concern based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting to provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan Template [DOCX] to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

Analyze the root cause of a patient safety issue or a specific sentinel event in an organization.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue or sentinel event.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 2 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 46 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan. A title page is not required but you must include a reference list as per the template.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.