Digital Forensics-Honeypot data analysis

The assignment is aimed at examining some of the attack vectors of two subject areas. First, the one associated with wireless routers and secondly, that of automotive security. As digital forensic investigators, you should be aware of the attack methods as awareness of what areas to focus on when conducting an investigation.

Your task is to research the areas mentioned and answer the following two questions:

    1) Investigate 2 methods used to backdoor or exploit firmware on a SOHO wireless router. Write in detail how each one works and what issue is utilized for each one. Incorporate one or more into the TP-Link firmware. (Document your process) (35 %)

    2) Investigate the need for automotive security and what countermeasures could be utilised. What tools and technologies are currently available to support a forensic analyst after a threat agent has been on an automotive system (e.g. CAN network/infotainment etc.). (35 %)

Please include only one introduction and conclusion for both topics in your report. 

story of a fictional Chinese migrant in Calcutta

2. Do the Optional Assignment (up to 2 points). For this optional assignment, you
are asked to curate a mini-exhibit for a display case in the Culinaria Kitchen. Select one food-related object that narrates the story of a fictional Chinese migrant in Calcutta, Jakarta, New York or Toronto. Your task is to prepare a short blurb of no more than 500 words, explaining where the object came from, who owned it, what they did with it, and how it helps us to better understand the foodways of the
Chinese diaspora in your chosen city. We will train you for this activity during
tutorials, where you may choose to do an analysis of the Hakka Odyssey Exhibition

Environmental Pollution

– Your analysis in a current environmental affairs topic of your choice in the form of short report containing at least one question and response/explanation with proper citation

– identifying  current  environmental affairs  topic  of  your  choice  and  writing  a  short  analysis  explaining  why  that  is important  to  you.

– Caution: You cannot simply report for a work that has been already done by you or others. Your  job  is  to  pick  up  an  issue,  understand  it,  and  add  more  to  it  with  some concrete  recommendations.  The  kind  of  recommendations  you  will  make  will provide  your  professor  information  about  your  ability  to  enhance  existing knowledge in a topic and build more to it. In order to pass this course successfully, it is important that you complete the assignment.

read the instructions

Before writing your response to this week’s discussion, please read the following essays that take different positions on the role of the humanities in higher education.

1) Marilynne Robinson, What Are We Doing Here?

World of Ideas, page 426

2) There Is No Case For The Humanities, Justin Stover

https://www.chronicle.com/article/There-Is-No-Case-for-the/242724 (Links to an external site.)

Please answer the following questions after having read both essays. 

1) Briefly summarize what each writer is arguing about the role of the humanities in higher education.

2) Which writer’s argument do you agree with and why? Feel free to give reasons from your readings or personal experience.  Isolate any fallacies in the arguments to make your point.

Length: Between 350 and 500 words

Your original response is due by midnight Wed, and your responses to two other posts are due by midnight next Sunday.