Biogeography

Compare and contrast the climate and flora/biomes in the High Canadian Arctic in the Eocene and the Holocene. Provide explanations of the observed changes. Use at least three peer-reviewed sources (academic articles). Must include a title, an introduction, a body/discussion, and a conclusion.

Topic: Pandemic & Public Health

Content Options: Select and use the assigned Durkheimian, Weberian, or foundational feminist theory to analyze the current pandemic and/or public health crisis. Another option is that you may pick two of these three sociological theory traditions and compare and contrast their insights when applied to the topic of pandemic and public health. Use the assigned readings and intros in the Kimmel course textbook as your only or main source for theory in this theory course. For the current topic, use credible sources (unless you’re doing a study of, say, fearmongering in social media. Such non-credible sources will be used as data, rather than credible authority.)

Here is the Sociology guide (courtesy of the Sociology librarian) on how to research and find credible sources for Sociology: https://libguides.lib.umanitoba.ca/sociology. I don’t care which professional citation style you use, though you must use it consistently; but my favorite style is ASA: https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/savvy/documents/teaching/pdfs/Quick_Tips_for_ASA_Style.pdf. Here is a writing guide for Sociology: https://sociology.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/documents/student_services/writing_guide/Writing for Sociology Guide Second Edition.pdf You will be graded on your writing (in the paper option) and logic quality, your proper use of and literacy with the assigned sociological theory, and your sociological approach to the topic.

Sonnys Blues

Everyday Use by Alice Walker

Assignment: Following the guidelines below, write four paragraphs in response to Sonnys Blues. Each paragraph will be worth 20 points; formatting and proper citation will be worth another 20 points.

You will need to include quotations from the story in at least two of your four paragraphs. The quotations from the story should include proper parenthetical citations in MLA style, and an MLA style Works Cited page.

Each paper should include exactly four paragraphs, including the following
1) Summarize the story in one well-developed paragraph. The summary should include all of the major plot points, but avoid minor details that are insignificant to the plot.
2) Analyze at least one literary element at work in the story. In analyzing the element(s), you should discuss how the element is used and why it is significant. The literary elements were discussed in class. I have also included a list below. (This would be a good place for one of your quotations.)
3) Interpret the theme of the story. Figure out the meaning of the story beneath the surface level you summarized for paragraph one. Your articulation of the theme should be more than a word. It should be a statement that captures the works main idea and its universal importance. (See further explanation of theme below in the list of literary elements.)
4) Synthesize (compare) the story with at least one other work of literature, movie, song, TV show, play, etc. Make connections between the pieces. You must compare the story with something specific that was made by someone else; anecdotes or personal reflections are not acceptable for this requirement.
Everything in this paper should reflect your own ORIGINAL thoughts and voice. No research on the Internet or in the library should be used.
Bring three typed copies of your full draft on Saturday 04, for peer review workshop. The final paper must be submitted via Canvas by

Review of Literary Elements
PLOT: The important events that make up a story.
SETTING: Stories actually have two types of setting:  Physical and Chronological.

The physical setting is of course where the story takes place.  The where can be very generala small farming community, for exampleor very specifica two story white frame house at 739 Hill Street in Scott City, Missouri.

Likewise, the chronological setting, the when, can be equally general or specific.
CHARACTER: What type of individuals are the main characters?  Brave, cowardly, bored, obnoxious?  If you tell me that the protagonist (main character) is brave, you should be able to tell where in the story you got that perception.
In literature, as in real life, we can evaluate character three ways:  what the individual says, what the individual does, and what others say about him or her.

SYMBOL: Simply put, a symbol is something which means something else.  Frequently its a tangible physical thing which symbolizes something intangible.  The Seven/Eleven stores understood that a few years ago when they were selling roses with a sign saying, A Rose Means I Love You. This element also includes figurative language such as metaphor, simile, and personification.

POINT OF VIEW: Point of View is the narrative point of view, how the story is toldmore specifically, who tells it. There are two distinctly different types of point of view: First Person and Third Person.
In the First Person point of view, the story is told by a character within the story, a character using the first person pronoun, I.
If the narrator is the main character, the point of view is first person protagonist. If the narrator is a secondary character, the point of view is first person observer. 
In the Third Person point of view, the story is not told by a character but by an invisible author, using the third person pronoun (he, she, or it) to tell the story.

THEME: Theme isnt so much an element of fiction as much as the result of the entire story.  The theme is the main idea the writer of the story wants the reader to understand and remember.

You may have used the word Moral in discussing theme; but its not a good synonym because moral implies a positive meaning or idea.  And not all themes are positive.

One wordlove, for examplemay be a topic; but it cannot be a theme.

A theme is a statement about a topic.

For example: The theme of a story may be that love is the most important thing in the world.  Thats a clich, of course, but it is also a theme.

Critically analyse and assess Nayanika Mookherjees argument about how public memories engaged with the pain, trauma and subjectivities of the war heroines of Bangladesh after 1971.

In  this  regard,  how  does Spectral  Wound contribute  to  the scholarly field of war. violence and sexual violence
in modern South Asia?

critically examine how she uses her interdisciplinary archive,
the questions she raises, her framework,
and assess the  contributions  of  the  monograph,  its  significance  and  intervention  in ongoing
scholarly conversations on sexual violence, war and trauma.

At least three scholarly reviews of Spectral Wound available in peer-reviewed scholarly journals online.

N.  Chatterjee,
The  Spectral  Wound,  Sexual  Violence,  Public  Memories  and  the
Bangladesh War of 1971,
Durham, 2016,
https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1215/9780822375227

For a gendered perspective on state violence, trauma and ethnography read U.
Butalia,  Introduction  and  Conclusion,  in
The  Other  Side  of  Silence,  Voices From the Partition of India, Durham, 2000, pp. 137-93,
http://go.utlib.ca/cat/8020343

For  another  perspective  on  the  same  issue  Bangladesh  read  Yasmin  Saikia, Introduction
Women,  War  and  the  Making  of  Bangladesh:  Remembering 1971,Durham ,2011,
https://search.library.utoronto.ca/details?8152928&uuid=ed04a42d-f111-478d-aa1b-b0fbd11e2c76

For  insights  into  normalisation  of  pain  and  trauma  read  Veena  Das  and  S. Cavell  (eds),  Introduction,
Violence  and  the  Descent  into  the  Ordinary, Berkeley, 2007.