“Correlation does not imply causation.”

/in /by

You may have heard it said before that “correlation does not imply causation.” This can also be called spurious
correlation, which is defined as a correlation between two variables that does not result from a direct
relationship between them. Instead, it results from the variables’ relationship to other variables. One example is
the relationship between crime and ice cream sales. Ice cream sales and crime rates are highly correlated.
However, ice cream sales do not cause crime; instead, it is both variables’ relationship to weather and
temperature.
Do some research and find some interesting, or even funny, examples of spurious correlation. Share, cite your
source, and discuss. Why is this an example of spurious correlation? How do you know?

Sample Solution

The post “Correlation does not imply causation.” appeared first on homework handlers.

Glycolate

/in /by

Should include the following information: (not necessarily in the order given)
    What is the effect on the cell/organism if the molecule is not present?
    What is the effect on the organism if the enzyme is defective?
    What is the effect on the organism if the enzyme is present in low quantities? What is the effect if it is present in quantities that are higher than normal?
    Are there any diseases associated with this molecule?
    What is the current research on the molecule? 

Please use two scholarly or Journal and put references in CSE format and include in-text citations.

Civil Rights

/in /by

This is the second part of the paper, the first part i was addressing Civil rights and its history and i will go ahead and attach that paper, and in this paper we are working on how to solve that problem and what should we do about it (civil rights)
Make an argument about what the federal governments policy should be about Civil Rights. What are the options we have, and which one is the best option and why?
Write 5-7 pages on options available to the American government to do (or not to do), and explain which one you prefer.

Case Review: OUTLINE

/in /by

This is for the course POWER AND NEGOTIATION

-First read Instructions provided
-Read and analyze the case provided (Negotiating about Pandas for San Diego Zoo). 

PART 1 already complete: Here is the proposal:
“For my individual case review project, I decided to write about the case, Negotiating About Pandas for San Diego Zoo. The San Diego Zoo, located in California, is known to be one of the finest and biggest zoos in the world. This case really stood out to me due to my passion for exotic endangered animals within zoos. I actually visited the San Diego Zoo long ago and was one of my desired childhood memories. My love for animals is something I am truly passionate about. It is know to be one of the rarest Zoos in which contains and breeds the giant pandas. Through my research, I found it very interesting to find that the San Diego Zoo is known for their Giant Pandas and the long negotiating process that took place to make this happen. This case is relevant to this course because it goes through the whole process of how the Zoo worked with the Chinese Zoos to procure the exotic giant pandas. The negotiation between the two was to figure out what the exchange would be and how to make arrangements for payments to China. They were able to build a relationship with China, which allowed them to obtain unbelievable animals, such as the two pandas Basi and Yuan Yuan.”

PART 2: For this portion of the assignment, you will write an OUTLINE that demonstrates:

A structured writing plan for the final paper in Part 3
Sufficient headings to demonstrate a complete paper
Sufficient sub-headings to demonstrate the development of content

There is an example outline provided