FRESH FRUIT BROKEN BODIES:

                    An ethnography is the systematic study of people and cultures. It is designed to explore cultural phenomena where the researcher observes society from the point of view of the subject of the study. As you read, think about the comment the author is making about the culture.  What revelation about the behavior of human beings or the conduct of society, or insight into the human condition is the author attempting to convey throughout the study?  



        Write a well-organized essay that uses specific examples from the ethnography Fresh Fruit Broken Bodies.Using evidence from the ethnography, textbook, or Conformity and Conflict readings answer one of the following questions:  

Guiding Questions

A description of key points of the culture studied in the ethnography)
An in-depth look at the concept of “worldview” or the comparison of the worldviews of the two societies described in the ethnography
Religious beliefs or practices described in the ethnography
Marriage/family practices described in the ethnography
Types of economic organization/systems described in the ethnography
Language acquisition or the influence of language on the culture described in the ethnography
The view of ancestors described in the ethnography
The role of women described in the ethnography
Doing fieldwork as an anthropologist as described in the ethnography
Ethnocentrism and some tips on how to minimize it as described in the ethnography

Writing your Essay

Read the grading rubric for this essay so you know what is expected.
Determine which question you want to explore
Form a thesis statement which answers your question of choice.
Use the outline below to organize your thinking and your writing.
Use a minimum of two (2) direct quotes from the ethnography to support the main idea of each body paragraph in your essay. Don�t rely on the quotes to explain themselves. Lead your reader into the quote, comment on the quote, and show how the quote supports your main idea.

OUTLINE FOR LITERARY ANALYSIS: THEME

Introduction
Introduce the book/ethnography. Include the title (underlined or in italics) and the author.
Use one or two sentences to express your personal opinions on the subject of the book
State the question you want to explore and a brief explanation of your main points (thesis)

Body
Write three paragraphs backing up your response to the question. Use examples from the ethnography, and any other material read in class that helps you explain your point.

Conclusion
Restate your thesis
What did you think of the ethnography? How has it affected you? (Has it confirmed or changed your opinions or thoughts?)

REQUIREMENTS:

After you complete your final essay, you need to CAREFULLY proofread it, or have someone else proofread it.

Re-read your essay to look for:

Spelling
Complete sentences
Punctuation (direct quotes from the text should be in quotation marks with the page number and last name of author in parentheses afterwards). Ex: When Maggie wanted to leave the party she stated, �I�m not feeling well, I think we should go.� (Delgadillo 63) This illustrates Maggie�s …
Essay should be typed in Times New Roman 12 pt. font and double spaced.
It should be a minimum of 1200 word
Include a title page with the following information:Name, Title of Essay, Date
You do not need a work cited page if you only use sources assigned in class. If you DO use any outside source, then you MUST include a work cited page.

The link to get the book:
it’ll require for the writer to set up a free account in order to get the book free
https://www.kobo.com/us/en/audiobook/fresh-fruit-broken-bodies-1

Sample Solution

The post Fresh Fruit Broken Bodies Book Report appeared first on homework handlers.

Qualitative Research Proposal Structure is given below:
1 Introduction:
Sections
1) Background to the Problem
2) Problem Statement
3) Rationale for the Study
4) Significance of the Study
5) Objectives of the Study
6) Theoretical framework
Layout of the Research
2 Literature Review:
Literature review needs to demonstrate that you have reviewed broadly on the topic and its wider context.
Additional notes:
1) LR should highlight trends in the literature relating to your research topic (research areas, methodology, theoretical approaches and findings).
2) LR should identify gaps in the literature (a critique) and shows the contribution your research will make to the subject area/discipline in general.
3) LR should also outline some of the limitations.
4) You need to draw on your literature review to justify your own research.
5 Draw on at least ten resources.
5)

4 Methodology:
Sections:
1) Study design
2) Sampling design
3) Data collection procedure
4) Data analysis methods
5) Ethics
Additional notes:
• Explain how you will conduct your research (as much detail as possible) with possible limitation.
• Describe the kind of research you will conduct to answer your research question
• Data collection methods (interviews, observations, etc.)
• Discuss the tool/s that you will use
6 Timeline, Budget, Limitations & Future Work:
Sections:
1) Timeline
2) Budget
3) Limitation
4) Future Work
7 Reference List:
All cited sources must be properly referenced in APA style.
5) Additional notes: Make a list of texts you have consulted. This should be a list of 10 potential scholarly and industry-specific/government sources.

Marking Rubric

 Total Mark           

Title Page: 2
Introduction:
1) Background to the Problem 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains Good critical analysis
2) Problem Statement 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains Good critical analysis
3) Rationale for the Study 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains Good critical analysis
4) Significance of the Study 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains Good critical analysis
5) Objectives of the Study 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains Good critical analysis
6) Theoretical framework 5 1-2 Marks if illustrations and descriptions of theoretical and conceptual frameworks are not appropriate with the research questions and research design. Vague and confusing descriptions of frameworks in a few paragraphs without supporting and relevant literature. 2-3 Marks if theoretical and conceptual frameworks are illustrated and briefly described in line with the research questions and research design. Brief descriptions of frameworks in a few paragraphs with relevant literature are presented. 4-5 Marks if theoretical and conceptual frameworks are appropriately illustrated and described in line with the research questions and research design. Clearly describes frameworks in a couple of paragraphs with relevant literature.
7) Layout of the Research 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains Good critical analysis
Literature Review:
1) Brief LR that highlight trends in the literature relating to your research topic 10 1-3 Marks if briefly described. Simplistic critical analysis and argument. The Assessment is weak in terms of the conceptual argument. 4-7 Marks if developing critical analysis. Somewhat simple coverage and understanding of both sides of the debate. 8-10 marks if well thought through assignment, described in detail. The Assessment has a strong argument that covers the relevant issues.
2) Identify gaps in the literature and shows the contribution the research to the subject area/discipline in general. 10 1-3 Marks if briefly described. Simplistic critical analysis and argument. The Assessment is weak in terms of the conceptual argument. 4-7 Marks if developing critical analysis. Somewhat simple coverage and understanding of both sides of the debate. 8-10 marks if well thought through assignment, described in detail. The Assessment has a strong argument that covers the relevant issues.
3) You need to draw on your literature review to justify your own research. 10 1-3 Marks if briefly described. Simplistic critical analysis and argument. The Assessment is weak in terms of the conceptual argument. 4-7 Marks if developing critical analysis. Somewhat simple coverage and understanding of both sides of the debate. 8-10 marks if well thought through assignment, described in detail. The Assessment has a strong argument that covers the relevant issues.
4) Research Question 8 1 -2 Mark if question is inadequate or insufficiently connected to the topic. Student chooses a report topic rather than a research question, a yes/no question or a question that can be easily answered with a web search. 4-7 Mark if Research question is related to the topic but is too broad or too narrow. Topic cannot be realistically researched with available resources. Question may be basic enough to be easily answered with general background resources instead of requiring deeper investigation.

5-6 if Research question is fairly focused, and is a good fit for available resources. Research question shows some understanding of issues and concepts related to the subject. Displays some aspects of original thought or investigation. 7-8 Marks if Research question is well developed with a scope appropriate to available resources and the terms of the assignment. Question is grounded in background information, but displays a high level of independent thought and inquiry.
Methodology:
1) Study design 10 1-3 Marks if The proposed research design is appropriate to answer the research questions. The purpose, questions, and design are mutually supportive and coherent. 4 – 6 Marks if The proposed research design has been identified and described in sufficient and detailed terms. The proposed research The proposed research design is relevant to address the research
questions. 7 -10 marks if The proposed research design is confusing or inaccurate to answer the research questions and sampling strategy.
2) Sampling design 6 1-2 Marks if the description of the context where the sample was situated and sampling strategy was vague and lacked of relevance to the purpose of the study. 3-4 Marks if the sample of the study was identified appropriately to the context of the study. Description of the sampling procedure was sufficient with the research design, but lack of justification. 5 – 6 Marks if the description of the sample is based on the context of the study. The sampling procedure was appropriate with the research design. Justification is provided.
3) Data collection procedures 6 1-2 Marks if the relevant descriptions of research protocol and ethics were not included. Descriptions to assure dependability, confirmability and credibility of data through data collection procedures would be achieved were insufficient. 3-4 Marks if Proposed data collection procedures for generating data were identified and described in a systematic way. Descriptions of procedures involved in data collection include protocol and ethical considerations are sufficient. Evidence of dependability, confirmability and credibility of data through data collection procedures was insufficient. Proposed data collection procedures were confusing, incomplete, or lacked relevance to purpose (issues that understudy), research questions, or sampling strategy. 5 – 6 Marks if Proposed data collection procedures were thorough, manageable, coherent, and powerful for generating rich and in-depth data. Descriptions of procedures involved in data collection include protocol and ethical considerations are clear and structured. Reasonable evidence of dependability, confirmability and credibility of data through data collection procedures was presented.
4) Data analysis methods 6 1-2 Marks if Proposed analytical method was confusing, incomplete or lacked relevance to the research questions, data, or research design. 3-4 Marks if Proposed data analysis procedures and its specific features were appropriately described with little relevance to the research questions and research design. 5 – 6 marks if Proposed data analysis procedures and its specific features were well-described and appropriate with given research questions and research design.
5) Ethics 2 1 Mark if Briefly described 2 Mark if Well thought through and contains critical thinking

Timeline, Budget, Limitations & Future Work:
1) Timeline 2 1 Mark not well thought through 2 marks if Feasible and appropriate
2) Budget 2 1 Mark not well thought through 2 marks if Feasible and appropriate
3) Limitation 2 1 Mark not well thought through 2 marks if Feasible and appropriate
4) Future Work 2 1 Mark not well thought through 2 marks if Feasible and appropriate
APA Referencing 5 1 mark if Limited APA style in-text citations used throughout the document. 2-3 Marks if Some APA style in-text citations used in the document. Reference list maybe missing some information 4 – 5 Marks if APA style in-text citations used throughout document and is correctly listed at the end

Sample Solution

The post Effects of customer satisfaction in the Restaurant industry appeared first on homework handlers.