Gender and sexuality

/in /by

According to sociologists like Kimmel and Ehrmann, men have to constantly prove their masculinity to others, making achieving it always elusive, and proof is always suspect. First, explain how and why sociologists consider male dominance over other subordinate men and women—is not explained by biological urges, but built into society’s social institutions (family, media, education, economy) and societal rewards for appropriate gender role behavior. Use Kimmel, Maccoby, McIntosh, Wade/Marx-Ferree, or other course materials in your answer. What makes this ideology of male dominance hegemonic, as defined in this course (NO GOOGLE SEARCHES—USE CLASS LECTURES AND TEXTS). Then, reflect upon your own experience within a hierarchy of male dominance, paying close attention to intersections of other demographics relevant to your biography and who you are, such as your gender identity, sexuality, age, citizenship status, race, or other identity intersections explored in Wade/Marx-Ferree. How does your position in this hierarchy make you feel in terms of power over your life experiences thus far? How can you—on the micro-level of interactions—transform a hegemonic masculinity ideology in meaningful ways, if you want to at all?

Sample Solution

The post Gender and sexuality appeared first on homework handlers.

Reflection Writing for Ethical Awareness

/in /by

Watch the documentary The Bleeding Edge documentary by Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering.
Dick, K. (Producer), & Ziering, A. (Producer). (2018) The Bleeding Edge. United States: Netflix.
After watching the documentary and setting the stage for your reflection, identify the medical devices and pieces of equipment present within the documentary that were involved in an ethical situation. For one medical device or piece of medical equipment, complete the remainder of the assignment. Your assignment should be single spaced and 1-2 pages.
Setting the Stage for your Reflection: Describe where you were when you watched the documentary. Also describe any feelings invoked before, during, or after the viewing. As your comfort level allows, document any direct connections you might have with the topic(s) discussed in the documentary.
Recognize the Ethical Issue: Identify the ethical issue around your chosen device/equipment. Specifically, what was the choice, decision, or action that happened?
Get the Facts: What do you recall about the situation? What facts are presented and what facts are missing? Who are the stakeholders and societal groups affected? What options do/did the stakeholders/groups have for action? Clearly label each option so you can refer to it in the next prompt.
Evaluate Alternatives: In considering the options identified in Get the Facts, evaluate these alternative actions by answering the following questions.
Which would produce the most good and do the least harm?
Which option best respects the rights of all who have a stake?
Which option would treat people equally?
Which option best serves the whole community?
Which option leads you to be the sort of medical device employee you’d want to be?

Sample Solution

The post Reflection Writing for Ethical Awareness appeared first on homework handlers.

Organisational Communication

/in /by

Stanley Deetz’s multiple stakeholder model suggests that all of society would transform if corporations/workplaces changed the way they functioned. For this assignment, you will apply the multiple stakeholder model to the Department of Communication or the University of South Florida (do not do both) and discuss at least one way either institution could change how they function, and, thereby, transform students’ lives.

This assignment will draw from your personal experiences, but, at the same time, it is an academic paper wherein you are making an argument. You are expected to approach the topic as a scholar, i.e., theorize your experiences, and use your experiences to make suggestions.

Sample Solution

The post Organisational Communication appeared first on homework handlers.

Jewish History

/in /by

Please compose an essay in which you offer a critical historical analysis of Canto II of the Books of the Wars of the Lord by the mid-10th century Karaite, Solomon ben Yerucham. (The document is attached.) This work, composed in rhymed Hebrew quatrains, represents one of many Karaite responses to the defense of rabbinic Judaism by Saadia, a.k.a., the Fayyumite (Fayyum is a region/city in Egypt).

Part of your analysis should offer a description of the source–noting, for example, who wrote the text, when it was written, and under what historical circumstances. The greater part, however, should offer an analysis of the source, explaining its main ideas, themes, and imagery, what it tries to accomplish, how the attitude(s) expressed in the source reflect dynamics in the Jewish community, or between Jews and the wider world, etc.

Sample Solution

The post Jewish History appeared first on homework handlers.