how far should scientists go to modify humans through genetic engineering

Hi need to write a paper that is 1000-1200 words apa format on the topic of how far should scientists go to modify humans through genetic engineering it has to be plagiarism free and academically sourced three citations four quotations one summary and one paraphrase and must provide opposing arguments this is due Monday

Business Real World Paper

The objective of the real world papers is to give you some practice in looking at the world through a management and organizational behavior lens. For this assignment, you should choose a real-world example of management dynamics and analyze it in terms of the concepts and theories from the textbook(please use theories from chapter 1, 2, 13 and 10). The paper should be a maximum of 3 pages long (12 point font, double-spaced, 1-inch margins).

CONTENT:

1) First, you will identify a real world event or problem that deals with one or a couple of the course concepts or theories covered in the class materials. The example you choose can be drawn from your personal experiences, media coverage of a current event, or a book, television program, or movie (or anywhere else you can think of). Typically, this section is shorter than sections 2 and 3.

2) Second, you should introduce relevant course concept(s), and use the concept(s) to analyze the situation. This is your opportunity to show me that you both a) really understand the research and theory behind the specific concept(s) you choose to bring in and b) can apply them in a persuasive an analytic fashion.

3) You should finally use theory to provide specific recommendations for improvement. For example: what does research say could be improved on? How does research/theory say you could “fix” any problems you described and analyzed? Conversely, how could management sustain “good” practices you described and analyzed?

Remember that your main objective with this paper is to convince me that you both understand the chosen management concept(s)/theory(ies) and can apply it (them) to a real, dynamic situation.

SOME TIPS:

Don’t go overboard with the number of course concepts/theories. It is totally possible to write an excellent paper using only one course concept or theory. Using too many may dilute your message.
Balance simplicity and complexity in choosing your course concepts or theories. Do not choose course concepts that are overly simplistic such as simply providing an example of a team you have worked on in the past to apply the term “team” to a real-life scenario. But you also do not want to become overly complex given the space and restrictions of the assignment.
Show me that you know you are applying a concept: This can be as simple as bolding/underlining/italicizing specific management terms, theory names or concepts.
Be brief: You do not have a lot of time or space to elaborate or to describe your real world event.

ECO 213

Find a newspaper, magazine or blog article that mentions Karl Marx and how he was right or wrong in terms of an economic claim he made. Write a quick one paragraph summary of the article and then quote the claim made by the author. Make sure to include reference or hyperlink to the source you used. Due next Tuesday by noon.

Application 4

**This assignment may not be resubmitted**

For this exercise, I am asking you to refer to a real life case of government misconduct that affected the lives of  thousands of juveniles and their families.

CASE: Kids for Cash scandal

You can learn about this story by going to the links below. Go to all links:

Videos about the case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zB8i6ftPU0&t=487s
https://www.msnbc.com/disrupt/watch/new-doc-highlights-kids-for-cash-scandal-178844227804,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNn-lzSYNNc
Audio only: https://www.npr.org/2014/03/08/287286626/kids-for-cash-captures-a-juvenile-justice-scandal-from-two-sides

Documentary: there is a documentary available, but we do not have it in our library, so you are not required to watch the documentary.

QUESTION: This assignment has 2  parts.

Identify a philosophy that justifies the judges actions and why it justifies his actions. (For this part, you’ll want to focus on the theories in part 1 of the book.)
Apply a philosophy that would condemn the judges actions and explain why his actions conflict with that philosophy. (For this part, you’ll want to focus on the philosophies in part 2 of the book.)
Review the following requirements before submitting your response:

Your response must reflect the material you’ve read.
Do not ask yourself, “What would I do?” ask instead, “What would a (hedonist,  egoist, utilitarian, deontologist, virtue ethicist, or social contract theorist) do?”
Content based on opinion does not count toward answering the question.
Be sure to cite the book as necessary according to APA style guide.
Failing to cite is plagiarism and results in a 0.