Crime Media

/in /by

Considering the mixed evidence on the association between media and crime, would you recommend that children or teens be forbidden to view media with violent content? Why or why not and what criminological theory helps support your answer? Your paper should include material from the textbook but also must include at least two peer-reviewed sources. Paper must be a minimum and no more than at least three full pages double-spaced not including the title or citation pages. Must use APA for citation.

Suggestions for how to organize your paper. These are suggestions to help you, but it is not required that every point listed below be addressed.
Do not forget to answer each question in the prompt (there are three)
Specify what type of media you are going to discuss in your paper (film, tv, social media, music)
What do you, society, or research consider violent content?
Focus on a particular crime (murder, sex crimes, robbery, auto theft)
Identify what age group you are discussing. (There is a huge difference between a 6-year-old and a 16-year-old in their interactions and understanding of media)
APA requirements
No Abstract is required for this paper, a Title Page is required.
Paper must be typed & numbered.
Paper must be 3 pages in length.
Paper should adhere to A.P.A format.
Do not use secondary citations (i.e., a citation that was in one of your readings, but you never actually read the original research). Do not cite by summarizing one reading, then another, then another, etc.  Instead, you need to integrate the citations into your essay.
This is a scholarly paper.  Avoid using I (or other pronouns).
The paper must include a title.
The paper must include an introduction paragraph that should grab the readers attention and state the thesis of the paper.
Ex.  The purpose of this paper is to .
The paper must include supporting paragraphs.
Do not use long quotes.
Break up paragraphs so that one paragraph does not go one for a whole page.
**Be sure to cite authors in your paragraphs.
The paper must include a conclusion paragraph.
Ex.  In conclusion, this paper presented.
Rubric Rubric – Alternative Formats

Week 6 Assignment: Memo You Decide

/in /by

Week 6 Assignment: Memo You Decide

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 75
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 8; review previous chapters
  • Lesson
  • Link (file): Preview the document
  • You Decide (See page in Week 6)
  • Minimum of 2 scholarly sources 

Instructions
This assignment presents a difficult and painful medical dilemma, with you in an imagined professional role. Go through the You Decide scenario and make the decision it calls for. Then, compose an official memorandum that will be kept for the record and could potentially be read not only by your Peer Review Committee but also by those involved in charitable fundraising, which supports hospital development, as well as by others with financial interests in the decision.

In the memo (use the Memo Template), explain your decision and your reasoning for it. Include the following:

  • Who benefits from what you decided? Explain why.
  • Who gets denied a needed benefit? Explain why.

You will see notice that there is time pressure in the simulated situation, so remember that you would not have the luxury to dawdle in the decision-making process, and as the decision maker, you would not have the luxury of consulting a broad spectrum of advisors. It falls on you to decide!

Include in the memo the utilitarian ethical philosophy of John Stuart Mill (from the lesson last week) and one other ethical philosopher of your choosing that we have studied to date. Use both of those philosophies to bolster your decision.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Grading
This activity will be graded based on Ethical Analysis Grading Rubric.

Weekly Objectives (WO)
WO5.1 

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Ethical Analysis Grading Rubric – 75 pts (2)Ethical Analysis Grading Rubric – 75 pts (2)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength5.0 ptsOutstandingMeets length requirement0.0 ptsNo Effort5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent10.0 ptsOutstandingAddresses all aspects of the assignment.8.5 ptsAbove AverageAddresses most aspects of the assignment.7.5 ptsAverageAddresses some aspects of the assignment.6.0 ptsBelow AverageAddresses few aspects of the assignment.0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis20.0 ptsOutstandingThroughout the whole work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writers evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.17.0 ptsAbove AverageThroughout most of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writers evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.15.0 ptsAverageThroughout some of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writers evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.12.0 ptsBelow AverageThroughout little of the work, the writing shows depth of critical thought; leverages readings and course materials in support of writers evident effort to understand ethical problems; establishes good use of theoretical underpinnings.0.0 ptsNo Effort20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization20.0 ptsOutstandingIdeas are logically organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, that come together in complete concepts.17.0 ptsAbove AverageIdeas are well organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, with complete concepts.15.0 ptsAverageOrganization and concepts need some restructuring.12.0 ptsBelow AverageOrganization and concepts are difficult to follow and incomplete.0.0 ptsNo Effort20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting / Presentation10.0 ptsOutstandingThroughout the whole work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).8.5 ptsAbove AverageThroughout most of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).7.5 ptsAverageThroughout some of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).6.0 ptsBelow AverageThroughout little of the work, the writing/presentation actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety; has a professional and consistent format and articulates clearly (presentation).0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting10.0 ptsOutstandingThroughout the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).8.5 ptsAbove AverageThroughout most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style (paper).7.5 ptsAverageThroughout some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page/slide includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA s

Critical Thinking Book Report

/in /by

Hi,

These are the following isntructions for the critical thinking book report.

Critical Thinking Book Report You are asked to write a report on Who Moved My Cheese, Mans Search for Meaning, and The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. The report should be between 5-7 pages, double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 point font, with 1 inch margins. The report should include the following sections and analysis:
1.    A summary book report on each book
2.    A discuss of each books application to the course material
3.    A discussion on their application to current social, economic and political issues.
4.    A discussion on their application to your life: Past, present and future

Project/Assignments.  All projects will be typed and submitted in a professional manner.  Proper APA citations will be expected on all work where a reference, meaning other authors work, is used.  Plagiarized papers will receive a big fat F (see definition of plagiarism).  Students with English Language difficulties are required to seek the assistance of the Learning Resource Center.  You are in college; therefore, all work should look professional and prove that you are indeed in college.
Grading Criteria.  All papers will be graded based upon proper and correct content according to the projects outline.  Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and correct use of the English language are all criteria that will be graded and checked.  Again, you are in college and by now should have an understanding of correct written English. 

I attached the books, the text book and syllabus.

Please let me know soon if you have any questions. No plagiarism no copy its for university matter.

Thank you for your time.

BUSI 645 GROUP PROJECT OUTLINE DUE 2/16/2020

/in /by

CAN YOU DO THIS FOR ME:DUE 2/16/2020 

 

 

 

Use this forum to collaborate with your group. Briefly describe how  the Bible is related to current course topics. An explicit integration  of the Bible must be present in order to receive points. Use 3 scholarly  sources other than the textbook and Bible to substantiate the group’s  position.

The Group Project Outline must be complete with  titles, planned sections, and a sample list of your sources. Submit the  Group Project Outline in the required links..

Use this forum to collaborate as a group before submitting the Group Project Final in the required links

MY PART IS TO DO A OUTLINE ON 

 –Performance appraisals p.59 in textbook/ Proverbs 27:23 

  

Group Project Instructions

The purpose of the Group Project is to generate interaction among students in regard to relevant current course topics with faith integration. Groups will be assigned by the instructor based on random selection by Module/Week 4. A minimum 1,000-word essay will be worked on as a group based on the prompt given.

Each group will complete a 1-page project outline and tentative reference page on an approved topic. The reference page will contain a minimum of 5 scholarly sources. This assignment must be in current APA format.

Each group is to select 3 broad course topics (e.g., pay for performance; person-based versus job-based pay determination; fair pay). Discuss those topics in light of a biblical worldview. For instance, consider and discuss pay fairness in relation to the Christian worldview of fairness. 

In addition to the Bible, the essay must include at least 3 other outside scholarly sources in current APA format (the text may count as one) to substantiate the groups position. Each reply must cite at least 2 sources. Acceptable sources include the Bible (which is required), the text, and other scholarly sources.

Each paper must be submitted in current APA format with an introduction and conclusion. It must be presented as though it is a whole paper, well edited, not individually written in parts and then pieced  together.

Individual projects are not allowed. Lack of participation is not acceptable and will result in a grade of 0. In other words, the instructor will review levels of contribution in order to determine individual grades in relation to the group grade.

Submit your outline by 11:59 p.m. on Sunday of Module/Week 5.