Journal Response- Psychology: Intro To Personality Theory

  The journal is an exercise in applying the principles of various approaches of personality to your life. Post at least one journal entry for each chapter read that week, using the online Journal tool. More posts are welcome, as you make connections and discoveries in your learning.

Journal entries are meant to reflect how you and other people react to day-to-day life situations, both positive and negative. Describe the strategies you and others may use to successfully navigate the challenges of life. 

     For example, and regarding the writings of A. Ellis, you might want to share how your language habits impact your perception of events (as seen in the four examples listed under the Ellis lecture). Considering Jung, you may address how some archetypes are notable in your character. Be as creative and prolific as possible in making relevant connections between lectures, readings, and your own life experiences. The journal will provide examples and material for your Essays 1 and 2. 

     Your journal writing shows that you understand the theories and can apply their main concepts to real people. Post at least one journal entry for each chapter read that week, using the online Journal tool. Multiple daily posts are welcome, as you make connections and discoveries in your learning. Practice careful writing and critical thinking. Toward the end of the term, you may edit out any parts you prefer to keep personal. Please cite and reference any sources of information other than our textbook, so you can use those in your papers. 

      The journal will be graded along with Essay 2 as the summary of your discoveries. It is graded on four criteria: 

1. Degree of personal exploration: Use of Personal Experience exercises, objective assessments and real-life examples. Insight and learning evidenced in journal entries. 

2. Application of theories from each chapter, using correct terminology and concepts. Uses assessment and personal experience exercises. Opinions are backed with evidence or references. 

3. Insight and Growth: Shows a pattern of realizations about own personality stemming from application of theories and assessments.

4. Good writing: Thorough and well-written with theory-specific vocabulary. Flawless spelling and punctuation. Thoughts are logically organized and easy to follow.  

Theory Critique

I am choosing to critique Callista Roys Adaptation Model

Select one of the models listed on the table in Meleis (Table 10-1, p. 177) and critique the theory you have selected to present.

Address all criteria presented in the model you select. For Barnum that includes the Internal Criticism and External Criticism, Chinn and Kramer includes Description of Theory and Critical Reflection, Fawcett you should complete Analysis & Evaluation of Nursing Models if you are using a model or Analysis & Evaluation of Nursing Theories if you are using a theory, which most of you are using. Lastly, you should complete Criteria for Practice Theory, Criteria for Midrange Theory or Criteria for Conceptual Models, whichever is appropriate for your theory.

Interdisciplinary Natural Sciences Reflection Essay

 In this assignment, you will be writing an interdisciplinary reflection essay centering around the natural sciences discipline of biology and the germ theory of disease. You will find detailed instructions below in the box entitled “Reflection Essay Assignment Instructions.” Follow the details of those assignment instructions very closely.

This reflection essay is NOT a research paper. You do not need to go online or to the library to find information about this topic. You will not need to cite references at the end of your paper or make in-text citations.

A reflection essay deals with information from your personal experience, observations of the world around you, your workplace, and your community. We want to hear your voice and your words on this topic. For the essay to be interdisciplinary, it must include more than one discipline, so you will be asked to reflect on different disciplinary aspects of the music that you love the most. Those disciplines are specified in the instructions below in the box entitled “Reflection Essay Assignment Instructions.” 

Paper About History Of Engineering ( 4 Pages )

Here is the Assignment detail:

– read Ross King’s Brunelleschi’s Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture. ( I will provide you with website so you can read this book online )

– And watch, Great Cathedral Mystery: Master craftsmen explore how Florence’s monumental dome was built nearly 600 years ago.

 (    ) * watch until 52:05 

In this assignment you will do two things in 4 pages, double spaced, 12 point type submitted here.  You may just answer the questions, this is not an essay per se.

*Detail the main arguments in the Ross King book and summarize the book.  Evaluate how useful you find the book and the arguments within the context of your training as an engineer.

*Compare and contrast what you learned from the King book to the documentary, Great Cathedral Mystery: Master craftsmen explore how Florence’s monumental dome was built nearly 600 years ago.

PLEASE don’t make a bid unless you are capable of delivering a paper about such topics 

due date is February 21