The criminal Justice fact pattern

Description

Write a 2 page paper analyzing the fact pattern scenario below. Please use your own state law. (Ohio) Your analysis should include application of the topics covered during the past 7 weeks. For example, search and seizure, search warrant, execution of warrant, exclusionary rule, Miranda rights, and the right against self incrimination.

Make sure all citations are in APA or Blue book format.

Please see the attached grading rubric below. This grading rubric will be used to grade this assignment.

Leila is a police officer. She is out of uniform and knocked on Dan’s front door of his house and asked is should could enter to enforce a warrant she had. The warrant was a search warrant issued by a magistrate at the Lawrence District Court. His name is Mark McCale, a retired police officer for the state police department in Lawrence. The warrant indicated that “the first floor of Dan’s house will be searched for a gun used in connection with a robbery and some jewelry, which was stolen.” While looking in Dan’s house, Officer Leila smelled what she thought to be gun powder emanating from the second floor. Officer Leila immediately walked upstairs and found a gun at the tops of the stairs. She went to confiscate the gun and while doing so noticed a note attached to the gun with an address on it. Later that afternoon police officers went to the address of the house listed on the note of the gun. A bunch of jewelry was found at this address and collected by the police officers. The address was a known address for stolen jewelry to be pawned. While at Dan’s house, Dan told Officer Leila that, “I do not know what you are here for, because I did not rob the Terri Grubb’s jewelry store.” Officer Leila asked Dan to go to the police station and Dan agreed. As they walked into the police station, Magistrate McCale yelled, “is that the person who robbed Terri Grubb’s jewelry store?!” Dan replied, “I told Officer Leila already, I did not rob the Terri Grubb’s jewelry store.”

Sample Solution

The post The criminal Justice fact pattern appeared first on homework handlers.

Diego Zoo Case Analysis

Description

Case Summary
This case is about the attempted procurement of two giant pandas for the San Diego Zoo. Giant pandas are an endangered species located in China. The situation attracts worldwide attention from numerous stakeholders, some of whom oppose the procurement while others support it. The case, which is based on actual events, involves power, influence, managing stakeholder interests, and interpersonal relationships.

The case highlights a number of concepts:

Negotiations that occur face to face with a negotiator
Negotiations the occur away from the face-to-face negotiations
Interests, power, leverage
The impact of alternatives
Communication
Planning for negotiation
Managing the interests of multiple stakeholders
Developing goals and limits

Develop a case analysis following the guidelines outlined in the Creating a Case Study document. For this analysis, you will assume the role of Douglas Myers. Incorporate the following questions into your analysis:

What are your goals compared to your Chinese counterparts?
What type of conflict may arise from the negotiation?
How would you describe the relationship between yourself and your Chinese counterparts? How might the relationship between the United States and China help or hinder the negotiation?
Realizing that you are in a lower power position, what is your plan for the negotiation? (Outline your plan based on the 10 steps discussed in Lesson 6.)
What is your BATNA?
What are your interests (as opposed to your position)? What are the other party’s interests?
What are the options for mutual gain?
As part of your analysis, find at least three quality sources to cite which will help to strengthen your analysis.

Sample Solution

The post Diego Zoo Case Analysis appeared first on homework handlers.

Critical Thinking on Your Own

Description

This is course work. The Discussion Question initial post I (Dalyse Mayo) submitted by one your writers is incorrect. Therefore, I need to correct that and answer the instructor (Tracy Marsh) question. I need to select two student’s post and respond with a minimum of 2 paragraphs using the learning resources. I need one full page for the initial post, respond to instructor one page and response needs to be two paragraphs per student. You are able to select the two students to respond to.
For this Discussion, select one of the following controversial issues:

  1. Cause of autism
  2. Use of hypnosis in therapy
  3. Validity of eyewitness testimony
  4. Legalizing same-sex marriage

SEARCH the Internet and find TWO (2) news or other articles that DEFEND DIFFERENT positions on the issue you chose. Be sure to include the URL for each article as a reference, using the appropriate APA format in the citation.

With these thoughts in mind:

1) Post by Day 4 a brief DESCRIPTION of the controversial topic in psychology you selected and the different position articles you chose.
2) BETWEEN the TWO articles, IDENTIFY a minimum of three common errors and/or fallacies.
3) Evaluate the impact of the errors/fallacies you selected on the psychology profession and on public perception, behavior, and/or attitudes.
4) Explain how you would re-think, re-write, or address the errors/fallacies you selected.

Sample Solution

The post Critical Thinking on Your Own appeared first on homework handlers.

The history of criminal organizations

Compare, Contrast, and analyze the organization, methods, and history of criminal organizations within at least two different nations.

Sample Solution

The post The history of criminal organizations appeared first on homework handlers.