Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Distress

Imagine you are serving as a psychological consultant to a newly discovered nation of the world and you discover that most people in this nation are happy while some are distressed and suffering from psychological disorders or mental distress.
Review and use any of the course Learning Resources to support this Module Assessment. You may also use any resources from your previous research for this course.

Assignment: (5 pages excluding title page and reference page)

Part 1: Happiness and Well-Being (2 pages)

Based on the situation provided and utilizing the course Learning Resources to support your thinking:

Select and describe three influences on happiness and well-being that vary across cultures for your new nation.
Explain why you think these three influences are critical to improving national well-being.

Part 2: Psychological Distress and Disorder (2 pages)

Based on the situation provided and utilizing the course Learning Resources to support your thinking:

Select and describe three influences on psychological distress and disorders that vary across cultures for your new nation.
Explain why you think these three influences are especially significant for understanding the nation’s psychological distress.

Part 3: Policy Recommendation (1 page)

Based on the situation provided and utilizing the course Learning Resources to support your thinking:

Make three policy recommendations to reduce psychological distress and explain why.
Make three policy recommendations for psychological well-being for this new nation and explain why.

Support your finding with references from the Learning Resources and your research.

Sample Solution

The post Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Distress appeared first on homework handlers.

Effects of mental health on family relationships?

How does ignoring individual mental health issues affect relationship outcomes within one’s family?

Sample Solution

The post Effects of mental health on family relationships? appeared first on homework handlers.

Audiology audsim

This patient is an active 49-year-old woman who works in an office setting . She has had hearing loss, assumedly since birth and there is a history of hearing loss in her family (one sibling and one parent). She has mild tinnitus bilaterally, no fullness nor pain in her ears, and she does not experience dizziness. She is being seen for routine audiological evaluation and hearing aid consultation. The patient is also seeking advice since she has been experiencing difficulty with everyday tasks (eg. Watching tv, talking on the telephone, participating in meetings at work).”

Following the testing procedure learned in class, complete an audiologic evaluation to determine this patient’s hearing thresholds. Make sure you set the transducer to “insert” for each ear. Masking will NOT be used for this case. Make sure to test using AC, BC, and inter-octave frequencies when appropriate.
Use the obtained thresholds to answer the questions on the following page(s).
After you are done with your audiometric testing and answering the questions, click “Show Results” and submit your assignment. A copy of your results will be emailed to me and another copy will be saved in your Documents folder.
Print a copy of your answers and bring them to class to submit. You do not need to print a copy of your audiograms.
For AC, which frequency did you begin testing? At which intensity? (2pt)
Describe the type and degree of hearing loss found in each ear. Include the configuration. (6 pt)
Calculate the pure-tone average (PTA) for each ear: (2pt)
Was testing done at any inter-octave frequencies? If so, which? Why? (4 pt)
Which ear(s) was/were used to conduct bone conduction testing? Does it matter which ear(s) you use? Why or why not? (2 pt)

Sample Solution

The post Audiology audsim appeared first on homework handlers.

Summative Assessment 1: Business Solutions Report (90%)

Aim: For students to conduct an individual in-depth investigation into a business problem and produce actionable recommendations

Learning Outcomes Assessed

Design and apply appropriate research methodologies and methods to investigate an important business problem.
Critically evaluate theoretical concepts and apply these to an important business problem.
Demonstrate expertise in research skills by generating appropriate data and undertaking systematic data analysis in order to address the research objectives or questions.
Synthesise arguments, draw conclusions and articulate practical and actionable solutions and evaluate the strategic impact of these.
Submission Requirements:

A 5,000 word Business Solutions Report (+/- 10%)
A Turnitin Similarity Report
The assessment for this course builds on the previous two Summative Assessments: your critical literature review and your research proposal from the preceding courses. This first part of the assessment involves producing an analytical piece of written work that is based upon empirical data collection and the application of theory to an important workbased problem. From your critical data analysis you will be expected to draw conclusion which result in actionable recommendations.

Please not that the word count for your final submission is larger than for previous assessments on the MBA (Global) programme. This is to enable you to effectively incorporate the necessary elements from the work you submitted for Making Sense of Research and Research in Practice. The assessments for these earlier courses will provide the foundation for your business solutions research and as such, they should form a significant element of your final essay.

It is however important that you do not copy your work verbatim, and you must appropriately rework the relevant information from previous assessments to suit your final project report. You will still be expected to submit a Turnitin Similarity Report alongside your final submission, but the given the nature of the research project, a higher Similarity Index is to be expected.

This report is an independent piece of work, so you will be expected to generate your own data and work individually to address your business problem. However, your research process will be supported by Action Learning Set discussions, through which you will have the opportunity to explore your ideas with your peers to enhance your work.

This research project is the culmination of the MBA (Global) assessments, for which you are required to produce a business solutions report. Whilst the research needs to identify a degree of complexity, it is vital that you identify a problem that is realistically achievable within the bounds of an eight-week course.

It is important to provide structure for your business solutions report and we offer a series of heading which you might wish to follow, and which parallel the Marking Criteria for the assessment:

Introduction Provides contextual setting.
Indicative Literature Relevant literature that identifies key debates and concepts.
Methodology Philosophical approach and methods used to gather data.
Analysis Analyse data to produce viable outcomes.
Discussion Discuss how the analysed data and themes relate to the academic literature.
Conclusion Conclude in relation to research projects aims.
Recommendations and Action Plan Provide actionable solutions.
We recommend that, before embarking on the writing itself and to avoid drowning in data, you devise a coherent plan that parallels your research design.

Your work will be assessed in a holistic manner, similar to a peer-review process. Within the masters level remit, we will focus on the extent to which your business solutions report achieves the relevant Learning Outcomes. However, whilst we will evaluate the quality of the writing overall, for example being analytical, rather than descriptive, we will also use the Marking Criteria given below to inform the feedback and mark allocation for the assessment.

Key Specifications and Requirements

You may refer to any of the materials and tools introduced on the course but must:

Ensure a high quality of argument is present in your work.
Provide evidence to support any arguments made.
Maintain the framework for a report style.
Write in a way that is suitable for the academic perspective you adopt, which means you may use first or third person as is appropriate within your article.
Label any diagrams used (e.g. Figure 1), give it a title, and credit the source.
Use Harvard referencing accurately.
Remember, the report/essay should be written in your own words. If you use a quote or directly insert words used by others then these must be placed in speech marks () and be followed by the author(s) family name, year and page number(s). If you are just using an idea then you should still acknowledge (reference)the source, but no page numbers are needed.
Ultimately, remember, you are navigating the reader through ideas/thinking and evidence and you are coming to a position. As such, there must be considerable you in the work. The work cannot simply be a collection of others peoples commentary. You should be comparing, contrasting, evaluating and then ultimately proposing a conclusion.
Write 5,000 words (+/- 10% not including references) and include a word count at the end of the assignment.
Marking Criteria

Your work will be assessed based on the following criteria:

Introduction Provides contextual setting; clearly explains problem and why, from an organisational perspective, it is strategically important. Provide precisely written research question and objective or research questions.
Indicative Literature Demonstrates critical knowledge of relevant literature by identifying key debates, concepts, frameworks and theories. Clarifies how the literature informs and supports the research.
Methodology Explains and justifies the approaches used to select, gather and organise relevant data.
Analysis Uses relevant approach in analysing data and produces sophisticated, in-depth outcomes. Presents results in user-friendly and informative format.
Discussion Discusses how the analysed data and themes relate to the academic literature. Identifies trends and patterns in theories and authors, and alerts the reader to criticisms. Develops the main arguments and makes explicit how the research objectives or questions have been achieved. Takes the reader on a logical journey and presents well-developed sub-sections that focus on a coherent story or theme.
Conclusion Provides conclusions that relate to the research projects aims and which flow from the discussion.
Recommendations and Action Plan Draws together key areas to provide actionable solutions that flow from the analysis; are related to the overall purpose of the project and are persuasive, realistic, timely and cost-effective. Produces a credible action plan to include a cost-benefit analysis and measurement, relevant to the organisation.
Submit your material by Friday 12pm (midday UK time) of Week 8 of this course.

You should first upload any written materials to Turnitin and download your Similarity Report.

Upload your final submission documents along with your Turnitin Similarity Report to the assessment area.

When uploading your work, make sure it is to the correct section of the Assessment area, either Summative Assessment 1 or Summative Assessment 2.

Please note that if a Turnitin report is requested as part of the assessment specification, failure to complete and submit the Similarity Report to the assessment area will result in an assessment grade of zero. If you are unable to access Turnitin please alert your Programme Coordinator.