Dyna Grow XL (Review 2020) Does It Really Work Or Scam?

/in /by

   If you use an emergency tablet, you can still get pregnant. There are no data that could confirm the effectiveness of this form of contraception. However, specialists agree that the sooner a tablet is taken, the greater its effectiveness in preventing pregnancy . Both types of tablets – used for 72 or 120 hours, can cause nausea, dizziness and headache, fatigue. Pain may occur – breast pain and stomach ache. Using this form of contraception may alter your menstrual cycle. If you vomit within two hours of taking a ’72 hour’ tablet, or three hours of taking a pill that can be taken up to 120 hours after intercourse, seek medical advice. As a result of vomiting and the likelihood that the agent has not absorbed into the blood, you may need to take an extra dose. Less than 1% of women using an IUD as a method of emergency contraception become pregnant, while pregnancy is not uncommon after using a contraceptive pill. Emergency contraception is not associated with serious side effects. Emergency contraception does not cause abortion. Emergency tablet and pregnancy prevention The emergency tablet is not taken preventively. The tablet that should be taken up to 72 hours after intercourse contains a synthetic equivalent of progesterone (a naturally occurring hormone). Progesterone plays a role in ovulation and preparing the uterus to accept a fertilized egg. The tablet prevents or delays ovulation.

  

Week 7 Discussion 2

/in /by

“Writing Budget Justifications” Please respond to the following:

Performance budgeting has been attempted at the local level in recent years all over the country. Address the issues of performance budgeting while answering the following questions: What attributes of performance budgeting make it particularly suitable to local government budgeting? Can the same attributes be as useful at the federal level?

Research The Health Illness Continuum And It Relevant To Patient Care.

/in /by

Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000 word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following:

  1. Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients.
  2. Explain how understanding the health-illness continuum enables you, as a health care provider, to better promote the value and dignity of individuals or groups and to serve others in ways that promote human flourishing.
  3. Reflect on your overall state of health. Discuss what behaviors support or detract from your health and well-being. Explain where you currently fall on the health-illness continuum.
  4. Discuss the options and resources available to you to help you move toward wellness on the health-illness spectrum. Describe how these would assist in moving you toward wellness (managing a chronic disease, recovering from an illness, self-actualization, etc.).

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assesses the following competency:

RN-BSN

5.1. Understand the human experience across the health-illness continuum.

Funding For Grants

/in /by

Funding for Grants

Dr. Miller purchases a much needed piece of specialized equipment for her research on hypertension. When preparing the purchase request, she realizes that the only account with enough money is her grant for research on sleep disorders. Because both grants are funded by NIH, she charges the equipment to the sleep disorder grant. Is this appropriate? (Adopted from NIH -Office of Extramural Research. (2007, April). Grants compliance & oversight. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from ) Discuss the major risks to both the manager and agency/organization for failure to properly comply and administer a grant.

When you discuss the major risks, substantiate your position by referring to any specific standards that you may currently be using or considering. Feel free to add relevant examples, share relevant resources you have found (articles, videos, podcasts, infographics, quotes), share your relevant personal observations or experiences, and/or offer a short scenario as a realistic application of the concept.

When responding to your peers original postings, compare their resources to yours and address the differences/similarities.

Please provide an initial substantive answer between 400 words in length.

Resources

Required References

Anthony, D. L., Appari, A., & Johnson, M. E. (2014). Institutionalizing HIPAA compliance: Organizations and competing logics in U.S. health care. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 55(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513520431

Krist, A. H., Phillips, S. M., Sabo, R. T., Balasubramanian, B. A., Heurtin-Roberts, S., Ory, M. G., & … Glasgow, R. E. (2014). Adoption, reach, implementation, and maintenance of a behavioral and mental health assessment in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 525-533. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1710

Kusserow, R. P. (2014). Metrics to Evidence and Benchmark Compliance Program Effectiveness. Journal of Health Care Compliance, 16(6), 4952. Retrieved from ebscohost.

United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). Grants compliance and oversight. Retrieved from

Recommended References

Burrow-Snchez, J. J., Martin, J. L., & Imel, Z. E. (2016). Applying for grant funding as a counseling psychologist: From thought to action. Counseling Psychologist, 44(4), 479-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015626272

Goldfried, M. R. (2016). On possible consequences of National Institute of Mental Health funding for psychotherapy research and training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000034

Merlino, J. P., Petit, J., Weisser, L., & Bowen, J. (2015). Leading with lean: Getting the outcomes we need with the funding we have. Psychiatric Quarterly, 86(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9376-0