Introducing the scholarly conversation

/in /by

Part II is a brief overview of your three literary articles on your thesis. The point of the assignment is to introduce the scholarly conversation around your story. You want to discuss what critics have traditionally said about your story using relevant quotations from your literary criticism. For each of your sources of literary criticism, you need to come to terms fully with the author’s argument and then consider how each argument might interact with the arguments of the other sources.
Your literature review should have five paragraphs presented according to the following structure:
A. Introducing the scholarly conversation around your story (article #1) i. Fully come to terms with the argument of the source H. Include relevant, necessary quotes Hi. Explain your discussion/points to be made about the quotes
B. Introducing the scholarly conversation around your story (article #2) i. Fully come to terms with the argument of the source H. Include relevant, necessary quotes Hi. Explain your discussion/points to be made about the quotes
C. Introducing the scholarly conversation around your story (article #3) i. Fully come to terms with the argument of the source H. Include relevant, necessary quotes iii. Explain your discussion/points to be made about the quotes
D. Paragraph on common threads. This paragraph should connect these literary critics’ ideas with each other. i. How are these literary critics’ ideas about the story similar? H. How does the literary critics’ ideas differ? Hi. How can you connect these critics’ arguments even if they are not addressing the same moments of themes in your story?
E. Transition paragraph. You should explain how your argument/thesis statement builds on or enters the scholarly conversation. You want to transition us from their ideas to your ideas: How do the three literary articles connect to your thesis statement?
•
•
Online – Contact support

Sample Solution

The post Introducing the scholarly conversation appeared first on homework handlers.

The etiology of Conduct Disorder.

/in /by

  1. Roach makes a clinical case for the etiology of Conduct Disorder. What is your opinion on his work? What is your own assessment about the etiology of Conduct Disorder? Where does this belief come from?
  2. Probsts chapter five challenges us to really evaluate the social work claim that we focus on person in environment. What is one of the main criticisms of this claim? Discuss your thoughts on this perspective.
  3. How do intergenerational patterns contribute to behavioral issues children exhibit? (hint: use your articles this week). As we explore working with children, we need to remember that we are mandated reporters. A summary of statues can be found here: https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/systemwide/laws-pohcies/statutes/manda/
    Uses only these references Reading/media:
    DSM-5: Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorders (focus on ODD & Conduct Disorder) Probst Chapter 5 World Health Organization (2016). mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings: mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) — version 2.0. Retrieved from: f https://www.whoint/publications-detait/mhgap-intervention-guide–version-2.0 Read page 69-92. Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) https://aseba.orgl Roach, C.B. (2013). Shallow affect, no remorse: the shadow of inner city trauma. Peace & Conflict, (19)2, 150-163. Tony, Z., & Billick, S. (2011). Implications of Antisocial Parents. Psychiatric Quarterly, 82(4), 275-285. Olino, T.M., Seeley, J.R., Lewinsohn, P.M. (2010). Conduct disorder and psychosocial outcomes at age 30: Early adult psychopathology as a potential mediator. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1139-1149.

Sample Solution

The post The etiology of Conduct Disorder. appeared first on homework handlers.

Dangerous Countries

/in /by

Most Dangerous Countries Essay

1.    Using the data from the Most Dangerous Countries in the World chart (attached).

2.    What theoretical research theory would be most useful for the criminal justice community?

3.    Be sure to analyze your choice from all sides of possible arguments.

Guidelines to the Essay:

a.    The essay should begin with an introduction to the topic.
b.    Organization should be logical, clear, and appropriate.
c.    You should provide strong evidence of critical thinking.
d.    Essay should end with a conclusion statement to support your essay.

** Need two (2) peer-reviewed, academic sources no more than 5 years old minimum**

Reading Discussion

/in /by

Often discussions about innovation focus on only a handful of the categories that Prasad has introduced as part of the comprehensive innovation framework. This is also true across the more granular categories presented in the “Ten Types of Innovation” book (https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/lib/asulib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1180146)

  • Which of the ten categories do you find most difficult to think of examples for (outside of what’s already presented)?  Why do you think that is? How might design thinking help spur innovation in that category?
  • Think of a business or organization that you think has been successful in innovating across multiple components of the Ten Types of Innovation. What is it? What are the components? Why do you think they were successful?

For full credit: Use specific evidence, quotes, or examples from the readings to support your answers. Use specific stories and life experiences of your own to make your response unique to you. Make sure youve answered the why question for any position or opinion that youve expressed.

As you thoughtfully answer each question in the prompt, ask yourself: Have I provided a perspective with enough detail to spur curiosity and commentary from my classmates? How might I draw on my own life experience and other coursework to make this response unique and personal?

Write at least 300 words

Due Feb 7th