Film Questions

/in /by

You have to write 1-2 page response that addresses the following questions about the film :
The movie called the Lorax (2012).

1. In what scene(s) did you find science that we’ve discussed?
2. Name two instances where you wondered about the scientific accuracy.
3. Find a science consultant (an actual scientist like a professor, researcher, museum curator, etc.) who you would contact to provide more credibility to the instances listed in #2.
a) Provide his or her credentials (degree, university)
b) Explain why he or she is the right person for the job
c) What specific question(s) would you ask him or her about how to best write/shoot/produce that scene?
4. Do you think the filmmakers included too little, just enough, or too much scientific content (terminology, theory, visuals, etc) and why?

Here is two presentation what we studies at class, they might help you to identify science weve learnt in class.

morality and international leadership

/in /by

1) critically evaluating how realism, liberalism and constructivism has treated morality in international relationship (this section needs to cite key figures’ analysis, and the conclusion should be complicated, instead of just saying realism say morality does not matter, liberalism say it matters) 2) why moral leadership matters nowadays with the world getting more populist and seperatist (this section needs to include details of specific cases to show the tendency of populism); 3) how to define universal morality

Sample Solution

The post morality and international leadership appeared first on homework handlers.

The necessary criteria a being must possess to have rights

/in /by

What are the necessary criteria a being must possess to have rights? Given your answer, do any non-humans have rights? Evaluate your position (by explaining an opposing view and defending your view against it).

Sample Solution

The post The necessary criteria a being must possess to have rights appeared first on homework handlers.

Practice Book Review

/in /by

PRACTICAL BOOK REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS

NOTE: You will need to log into the following website and use my login credentials to read the ebook:

https://www.kobo.com/us/en

This Practical Book Review provides an opportunity for you to reflect on, respond to, and evaluate the ideas, concepts, and techniques in Petersens (2015) Why Dont We Listen Better? based on your own life experiences and ideas from other course texts, and apply these to your interpersonal communication context. Begin the body of your paper with a brief introductory paragraph, then organize your review in 3 sections, using the headings Response, Critique, and Application, following the specific directions provided below. Your review must be well written and organized, free of grammar and other writing errors, and formatted according to current APA style. A title page and a reference page are expected, but an abstract is not needed. Also, you may use the first-person pronoun.

Response
Articulate a personalized response that demonstrates meaningful reflection on the core content. Describe insights you gained about your own communication skills, strengths, weaknesses, and habits. For example, what concepts and principles were especially enlightening to you? Were you reminded of any past conversations? Did you identify with any of the communication traps? Your response should be between 400 and 500 words.

Critique
Evaluate the book from your own point-of-view and based on its intended purpose. What did you identify as its most valuable contributions? Did you find any of the concepts unclear or insufficiently developed? Also, compare and contrast 3 of Petersens ideas with related concepts articulated in Stewarts Bridges Not Walls as well as in France & Weikels Helping Skills for Human Service Workers (and list these texts on the reference page along with the Petersen text). How are the perspectives of the three authors similar and/or different? Briefly analyze and discuss the relative strengths of each. Your critique should be between 700 and 800 words.

Application
Looking forward, apply what you have learned to your own interpersonal arena. Articulate the changes you need to make in light of the information gleaned from the content. Describe the specific strategies and techniques that you will implement in order to enhance your interpersonal communicationboth personally and professionallyand how you plan to do so. Your application should be between 400 and 500 words.
View less