Update & Upgrade IT Security Infrastructure

/in /by

I am approaching graduation in Bachelor of Science, Cybersecurity. This course requires the completion of a capstone proposal and a capstone report.

It consists of following six steps to mark progress through the capstone experience:

    1. Submit a brief project idea to your Course Instructor for approval to continue.
    2. Write the full proposal to conduct a project based on the project idea.
            Submit the proposal for grading.
            Conduct/execute the project.
    3. Write the post-implementation report, which describes project outcomes.
            Submit the capstone paper for grading.

In this stage, I need assistance with completing item 1 from the list above. Please help fill out the highlighted items on IT Capstone Topic Form.docx. I have included a sample -IT_Capstone_Topic_Approval_Form_Sample.pdf  to help chose appropriate topic.

Evidenced based patient centered concept map

/in /by

Concept Map

Develop a concept map for the individual patient, based upon the best available evidence for treating your patient’s health, economic, and cultural needs.

Narrative
Develop a narrative (24 pages) for your concept map.

Analyze the needs of your patient and their family, and determine how those needs will influence a patient-centered concept map.
Consider how your patient’s economic situation and relevant environmental factors may have contributed to your patient’s current condition or affect their future health.
Consider how your patient’s culture or family should influence your concept map.
Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your concept map.
Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case.
Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family.
Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the degree to which the desired outcomes of your concept map were achieved.
Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
Explain how you will communicate specific aspects of the concept map to your patient and their family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Ensure that your strategies:
Promote honest communications.
Facilitate sharing only the information you are required and permitted to share.
Are mindful of your patient’s culture.
Enable you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to your patient and their family, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

IS THE USE/MISUSE OF CELL PHONE TOWERS A RELIABILITY OR VIOLATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

/in /by

This is the Methodology (Chapter III).  Please see the below for instructions for writing the Methodology.

This chapter should describe how the data will be collected for the research (i.e. original “bench type”, survey or peer reviewed data from published sources of data collected from various government or other databases) that after analysis WILL ALLOW YOU TO MAKE A COMPELLING ARGUMENT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT EACH RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS.  It is important to utilize appropriate methods of data collection in order to be able to support or reject the research hypothesis.  This chapter should begin with a description of the research methods used in the research, including a description of the dependent and independent variables, if any. 

Chapter III (Methodoloy) will most likely include the following subsections:

Setting:  if important to the research, described the time and place of data collection.

Description of the Subjects:  depending on the type of data used in the project, this subsection can include either subjects involved in primary data collection, or those described in published research studies. If the project involves human subjects, it is necessary to first obtain their consent in writing..

Description of the Research Instrument (s):  fully describe all questionnaires and tests, if appropriate.  Include a copy of questionnaires in the Appendix.

Procedures:  describe in full detail how data were collected.  If different methods were used, each method must be described.  This subsection should also include a description and rationale for any statistical procedures used to support or reject the research hypothesis.

European Transportation

/in /by

Topic: Select one industry of your choice in Europe. Identify and explain how the policies of the European Union have contributed to increase or decrease the profits of the businesses in that industry.

Industry: Transportation.

Format: the minimum length is 7 pages single-spaced and the maximum length is 15 pages single-spaced, font 12. Report all tables and figures at the end of the paper. The length does not consider the appendices with tables and figures. Use as many tables and figures as you need. Use the reference style that you prefer as long as you cite the sources both in the text and at the end of the paper in a reference list.

Evaluation Criteria:

    Evidence reported. Collect as much evidence as possible from articles, news, reports, databases, to provide rich data displaying the change in profitability of businesses and to validly and reliably support your arguments explaining how the policies of the European Union have impacted the profitability of the businesses in the industry. Report all the evidence in the reference pages at the end of the paper.

    Clarity of the arguments. The profitability of businesses could have increased or decreased for a multiplicity of reasons. You have to develop compelling and convincing arguments that establish a clear attribution of causality to the policies of the European Union and not to exogenous factors that could have exercised an influence.

    Originality of the arguments. You are tasked to develop your own critical perspective. If you find an article that already makes the analysis for you and you only report the ideas taken from this article, you will not have provided any critical thinking or personal contribution. Whenever you are relying on an argument developed by an external source, cite every time and clearly the source of the information. Never misattribute an argument, by making it appear as yours while, in fact, the thought was borrowed from an external source. Misattributing an argument is a serious flaw and will result in a significantly lower grade. 

    Primary data. Cite in the paper the primary sources of information clearly identifying who you have talked to and reporting the thoughts.