Curriculum Overview, Framework, and Analysis

Prepare a 5 page evaluation and theoretical framework analysis of a nursing curriculum of personal or professional interest.

The nurse educator role is a dynamic, challenging, yet rewarding career choice for which many nurses have developed a passion. This course provides you with an opportunity to assess, design, implement, evaluate, and revise nursing curricula. Because health care knowledge and technology are expanding, these elements must be considered when a curriculum is built for today’s learner.
In this assessment, you will select a nursing curriculum either from an academic setting, such as a school of nursing, or a clinical setting, such as a hospital staff development program. You will evaluate the selected nursing curriculum in detail and describe the organizing design or theoretical framework on which your selected curriculum is based. You will also need to examine how this design or framework is demonstrated in the curriculum. Possible organizing designs or frameworks include simple-to-complex, stages of illness, nursing conceptual framework, concept-based, outcomes based, competency-based, interdisciplinary, and others.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
* Competency 1: Examine the development of a curriculum for a nursing program.
    * Identify an appropriate nursing curriculum, the intended learner population, and why it is needed.
    * Describe the student learning outcomes of a selected nursing program
* Competency 2: Analyze factors that impact the design of a nursing curriculum.
    * Provide the mission statement and course descriptions for all courses in a selected curriculum.
    * Describe the established professional standards, guidelines, and competencies incorporated in a selected nursing program.
* Competency 3: Select an appropriate organizing/curriculum framework for the design of nursing curriculum.
    * Explain how an organizing design and theoretical framework or model is demonstrated within a selected nursing curriculum.
    * Provide an overview of the history of a selected organizing design and theoretical framework or model.
    * Describe the major concepts of a selected organizing design and theoretical framework or model.
* Competency 4: Select a curriculum evaluation process that facilitates continuous quality improvement.
    * Recommend a process to update health care knowledge in a selected nursing curriculum
* Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations of a nursing education.
    * Write effectively using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting.

According to Iwasiw and Goldenberg (2015), curriculum design involves not only configuring courses within a program, but also deciding how those courses will be sequenced and establishing a relationship between the courses. Also, the mission, values, philosophy, and goals of the institution influence the curriculum design of the nursing program. These relationships are articulated through the strategic goals and plan, and should be clearly identifiable within the curriculum.
In addition, many institutions identify a theory or set of theories that form a theoretical foundation for their curriculum. In today’s nursing education, it is often found that the theories used as a conceptual framework are not necessarily limited to nursing theories. Theory has been borrowed from education, sociology, and psychology to form a foundation for nursing curriculum. The main point is for the institution to validate that the theory they are using for their conceptual foundation is consistent with the mission, values, and philosophy of the institution and the nursing unit.

Assessment Instructions
* In Assessment 2, you will design a course to be included in the curriculum selected in this assessment.
* In Assessment 3, you will examine the evaluation process used to evaluate the curriculum selected for this assessment.
Preparation
As a practicing nurse, you have been asked to present an evaluation of a nursing curriculum to a nursing leadership team at your place of employment. They are seeking input on coursework recommendations for CEU fulfillment. The curriculum you select should be of interest to you either personally or professionally.
In this assessment, you will select a nursing curriculum either from an academic setting, such as a school of nursing, or a clinical setting, such as a hospital staff development program. If you are currently teaching, you may wish to use the curriculum from your school or workplace. If you are not currently teaching, you may want to consider using the curriculum from your undergraduate program. If neither is an option, you are encouraged to look for a nursing curriculum you can use as a model for your assessments. One choice might be an orientation curriculum for a clinical facility.
You will evaluate the selected nursing curriculum in detail and describe the organizing design or theoretical framework on which your selected curriculum is based. You will also examine how this design or framework is demonstrated in the curriculum. Possible organizing designs or frameworks include simple-to-complex, stages of illness, nursing conceptual framework, concept-based, outcomes based, competency-based, interdisciplinary, and others.
Requirements
Your overview and analysis of the curriculum should fulfill the following:
* Identify an appropriate nursing curriculum, the intended learner population, and why it is needed.
* Provide the mission statement and course descriptions for all courses in a selected curriculum.
* Describe the established professional standards, guidelines, and competencies incorporated in the program.
* Describe the student learning outcomes of a selected nursing program.
* Recommend a process to update health care knowledge in a selected nursing curriculum.
* Explain how an organizing design and theoretical framework or model is demonstrated within a selected nursing curriculum.
* Provide an overview of the history of a selected organizing design and theoretical framework or model.
* Describe the major concepts of a selected organizing design and theoretical framework or model.
You will use this assessment to complete Assessment 3. Be sure to incorporate the feedback you receive before adding this assessment to Assessment 3.
Additional Requirements
* References: Include references from at least three peer-reviewed journal articles, cited in proper APA format.
* Length of analysis: The analysis should be 57 pages in length, not including the title page and the reference page, and it must follow proper APA style and formatting.
* Appendix: You may use an appendix for appropriate material, such as individual course descriptions. The appendix will not be included in the page count for the analysis.
* Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Abstracted Outline

 

Abstracted Outline

Begin your review of the theoretical and research literature to support for your Integrative Project: Chapters 15. Keep in mind that you will demonstrate, via a thorough review of the literature, what represents best practices in a practice or specialization in psychology.

At this point in the development of your literature review, you should be able to identify 1625 sources that support the development of the abstracted outline.

Create and post an abstracted outline of your Chapter 2 Literature Review for your Integrative Project. You should present one or two sentences for each main heading and subheading, explaining the key points to be covered under each section.

Format example:

Topic LSQ

Chapter 2

Main heading section 1 (one- or two-sentence description)

  • Subheading 1-1 (one-sentence description)
    • Article 1 (APA reference citation)
    • Article 2 (APA reference citation)
  • Subheading 2-1 (one-sentence description)
    • Article 3 (APA reference citation)
    • Article 4 (APA reference citation)
    • Article 5 (APA reference citation)

Main heading section 2 (one- or two-sentence description)

  • Subheading 1-2 (one-sentence description)
    • Article 6 (APA reference citation)
    • Article 7 (APA reference citation)

Note: The number of main sections and subsections will depend on your topic and the quantity and quality of your literature search results.

This material should be cited in APA style and the outline should conclude with an APA-formatted reference list.

Attach your discussion as a Word document set in Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced type. In addition, please copy and paste the content into the message box for your post.

Strategic Management

 Discuss: Why is it critical for company managers to have a clear strategic vision regarding their organization?  

 dISCUSS: What are the key factors for competitive success and why? 

Personal Values Examination

 

Personal Values Examination

Use this exercise to clarify your core values. Having done so, you can apply the same clarification process to any theory or model you read about in this course.

Think of one of your core values. Then write down answers to the following questions:

  • Was this a value you chose freely?
    • How did you make a personal decision to make it a core value? Or did you adopt it from your family or culture?
  • Was your core value chosen from real alternatives?
    • For example: You might value eating bran flakes for breakfast. When you go to a store, you see part of a long aisle filled with different brands of bran flakes that are basically the same. How do you select one brand over another? When faced with these options, is it a choice among real alternatives? In the case of your core value, which alternatives did you consider before deciding this value was core?
  • How long have you been practicing your core value?
  • How has experience been a teacher? What was the most important lesson you learned by practicing it?
  • How do you regain a sense of integrity when you discover that you have unintentionally acted in opposition to it?
  • If you were challenged by someone in a public setting about the validity of the core value you chose for this discussion, how would you defend it?