Historian John Gaddis suggests that strategic leaders as well as strategic theorists can be viewed as “foxes,” “hedgehogs”- or both. What are the advantages and disadvantages of fox-like versus hedgehog behavior in the making and implementation of grand strategy? What is the right balance or combination? Give multiple historical examples from the readings to make your case. Give current examples as well if you like. Refer to relevant strategic theorists such as Machiavelli. Then conclude by offering policy implications for the United States today.

Sample Solution

The post Fox-like versus hedgehog behavior in the making and implementation of grand strategy appeared first on homework handlers.

https://www.academia.edu/25624348/Cases_in_Comparative_Politics
Both China and India have been incredibly successful at promoting economic growth, but they have pursued very different paths to political development, India the democratic road and China the authoritarian one. How have the two countries responded politically to meet the challenges of development as detailed in lecture and chapter 10 of Essentials? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches? In your essay, focus primarily on the role of political institutions, government and party as appropriate to the case.
How have India and China addressed the goals of freedom and equality? The primary emphasis here is on a discussion of political institutions. Why do you think these countries adopted such different paths to these goals?

Sample Solution

The post China and India economic growth appeared first on homework handlers.