Discuss the limits of intelligence and whether or not those limits can be overcome. For example, intelligence must be timely, shared with the stakeholders, unbiased, and objective.

/in /by

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Part 1: Main Post

Complete the following tasks for this assignment:

  • Discuss the limits of intelligence and whether or not those limits can be overcome. For example, intelligence must be timely, shared with the stakeholders, unbiased, and objective.
  • What mechanisms should be put in place to ensure that those limits can be overcome?
  • A high standard of ethics must be maintained at all times within the intelligence community (IC). What procedures should be put in place for accountability and to ensure privacy and professionalism for intelligence collection agencies?

Part 2: Summative Discussion Board

Review and reflect on the knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least 3 paragraphs on the following:

  • What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?
  • How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?
  • What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?
  • The main post should include at least 1 reference to research sources, and all sources should be cited using APA format.

CAPS 401 General Education Capstone

/in /by

This week, post your final video presentation here for peer and instructor Question and Answer. There are three requirements and three deadlines: 

1. Post your video no later than Monday 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time). Title your video post with your name and a brief topic description (e.g., Jenny Smith: Sepsis Training). Along with your video, provide the following information:

  • Briefly explain your healthcare issue and your proposed solution to the issue.

2. No later than Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time), watch at least two peers’ videos and post thoughtful questions related to the content and conclusions of their study. Your instructor may assign you specific peers to review. Otherwise, select at least two peers to review (do not pose the same questions to both peers).

  • You must ask 3 thoughtful questions of each peer. 
  • Keep in mind that this is not a peer review of the presentation, although positive feedback is encouraged when appropriate. Your goal is to ask your peers questions that dig deeper into their problem and their proposed solution.
  • Your questions may address some of the following topics: research sources, perspectives, the proposed solution, and obstacles related to the solutions.

3. No later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time), you must formally address the questions posed by at least two peers and/or the instructor (address a total of 6 questions)in which you must cite evidence from your presentation/ final paper using APA Styl

Comparing Indigenous religions and Hinduism

/in /by

Please discuss the benefits and drawbacks to having a written sсrіpture or not. Keep your reading grounded in what we have read and quote from our texts often. Use the attached texts only and quote from the readings with citations. Come up with a clear thesis statement. Stick to the prompt. Make sure every sentence has to do with a pro or a con of having written sсrіpture. Do not list religions, do not tell me facts about religions, ARGUE your point and back it up with quotations from the texts.

Sample Solution

The post Comparing Indigenous religions and Hinduism appeared first on homework handlers.

Philosophy of mind; “The mark of the mental”

/in /by

Some philosophers have thought that there is an epistemological mark of the mental—i.e., mental states are distinguished from non-mental states by being known in a different way from non-mental states, or by being known better than non-mental states are known. Is this a defensible view? Is there an epistemological mark of the mental? A variety of proposals have been made: that the mental is or can be known directly, the non-mental only indirectly; that the mental is or can be known directly by the subject, the non-mental not so; that we are infallible with respect to mental states; that we are incorrigible with respect to mental states; that we are omniscient about mental states; that mental states are self-warranting in the sense that merely being in the states is enough to make you prima facie justified in believing that you are in the states. You need not review all these options. Rather, select the ones you regard as most promising and subject them to scrutiny. Are any of these proposal defensible, and which is the best proposal? (Kim, chapter 1; William Alston, “Varieties of Privileged Access,” American Philosophical Quarterly 1972)

Sample Solution

The post Philosophy of mind; “The mark of the mental” appeared first on homework handlers.