Assignment 1 Company description and SWOT AnalysisAnswers 2Bids 39Other questions 10

/in /by

Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.Assignment 1: Company Description and SWOT AnalysisDue Week 3 and worth 100 pointsIn this assignment, you will conduct a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat) analysis for the type of beverage you have selected, and for your company overall. As you work on the assignment, consider why you have chosen one type of non-alcoholic beverage over another and the reasons for that choice. As you complete your SWOT analysis, be sure to include external factors such as industry / market trends and competition, and internal factors such as your capabilities or abilities to reach certain market segments.Write a three to five (3-5) page paper, in which you: Create your revised NAB company name and explain its significance. Describe the non-alcoholic beverage you will produce and sell.  Develop your revised company’s Mission Statement and provide a rationale for its components. Hints: Use the Statement of Mission template on pp. 72-73 on the course textbook: Successful Business Plan to aid your development. Click here for help accessing a specific page number in your eBook. Extracting appropriate information from the NAB company portfolio, where applicable. You should fill in other required items in the template using your personal preferences. Describe the trends in the non-alcoholic beverage industry, especially the specific type of beverage category you have chosen. Justify at least three (3) reasons why you have chosen this type of non-alcoholic beverage.  Hints: Research and outline beverage industry trends. Consider the size and growth rate of the industry overall and the specific beverage type you have chosen. Use the worksheet in the course text (p. 88 | Past and Future Growth of Your Industry) to help you project the future growth rate. Consider the use of industry associations and search engines to find reliable, recent data. Choose one (1) strategic position from the course text (pp. 142–143) that you believe is the best strategic position for your company. Explain the approach you will use to implement this strategic position in order to distinguish your beverage from other non-alcoholic beverages. Provide an overview of your company’s distribution channels. Explain the manner in which your product will reach end users. Provide a rationale for your chosen method.  Hints: For example, will you sell your beverage in grocery stores, restaurants, or sports venues? If so, describe the types of resellers and distributors who will sell to resellers and fulfill their orders. If you are attempting to sell direct-to-consumers, such as online via a monthly subscription, how will you manage warehousing / fulfillment / shipping? Outline at least three (3) types of risks (including any regulatory risks) that your business faces. Describe your company’s plan to mitigate such risk.  Hints: You may refer to the types of risk listed in the course text (pp. 148–149) as well as any risks not listed in the text. Regulation weighs more heavily on beverage and food businesses than many other types of companies, so be certain to consider any regulatory risks your type of beverage faces. For example, what kind of regulation and / or risks are you likely to face if you make health claims about your beverage? Develop a SWOT analysis for your NAB company using the SWOT matrix worksheet in the course text (p. 153 | SWOT: Strengths / Weaknesses / Opportunities / Threats)  Hints: What are your company’s likely strengths? Have you chosen a beverage segment that is growing and lacks an entrenched competitor? Are you in a niche market that has great potential? What are the strengths that you and other team members bring to your company? Do you or other team members have previous experience in the food and beverage industry? Hints: What are your company’s likely weaknesses? Is the competition in your industry segment entrenched? Is your own management team inexperienced? Will it be challenging to actually produce your product and maintain quality? Hints: What are your company’s opportunities? Does your segment have more demand than supply? Have larger corporations stopped serving smaller or niche markets that you could enter? Is a new market emerging because of demographics, immigration, changing tastes? Hints: What are your company’s threats? Is there a clear market leader that will be hard and expensive to displace? Are downward-pricing pressures in the segment making profit margins slim? Are there little or no barriers-to-entry for new competitors; if you have a novel idea that succeeds, can the competition easily enter your market? If you have a global aspect to your company, do factors such as currency fluctuations, political instability, offshoring or outsourcing pose threats? Format your assignment according to these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. Cite the resources you have used to complete the exercise. Note: There is no minimum requirement for the number of resources used in the exercise. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Analyze the role of a company mission, vision, and objectives and the impact to business strategy. Describe strategic planning techniques used to formulate alternative strategies designed to achieve stated business goals. Analyze the external and internal environment for opportunities, threats, strengths, and weaknesses that impact the firm’s competitiveness. Use technology and information resources to research issues in strategic management. Write clearly and concisely about strategic management using proper writing mechanics.

The post Assignment 1 Company description and SWOT AnalysisAnswers 2Bids 39Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Assignment: Application of Cognitive Behavior Theory to a Case StudyAnswers 0Bids 75Other questions 10

/in /by

This week, your theoretical orientation is cognitive behavior theory. You will use the same case study that you chose in Week 2 and have been analyzing in this course. Use the ‘Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study” worksheet to help you dissect the theory. You do not need to submit this handout. It is a tool for you to use to dissect the theory and then you can employ the information in the table to complete your assignment.In this Assignment, you prepare a 5-minute video case presentation. It is common to present a case analysis in multidisciplinary team meetings or with your supervisor and colleagues. This assignment offers you an opportunity to provide insights and perspectives to a case.To prepare: Use the same case study that you chose in Week 2. Read this article listed in the Learning Resources: González-Prendes, A. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2009). Culturally sensitive treatment of anger in African American women: A single case study. Clinical Case Studies, 8(5), 383–402. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/1534650109345004This article provides a nice framework for how the authors’ cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation shaped the conceptualization of the case and assessment and intervention.To upload your media for this Assignment, use the Kaltura Media option from the mashup tool drop-down menu. Refer to the Kaltura Media Uploader area in the course navigation menu for more information about how to upload media to the course.By Day 7Submit a Kaltura video of yourself discussing the client. Your video should be no longer than 5 minutes. Although this is a professional presentation, it is not a formal presentation as in a speech. Imagine that you are discussing your case with a group of peers in a meeting. For example, if you stumble a bit, don’t feel you have to record yourself again. You can have notes in front of you to help you remember your points. However, your video does need to be professional. In other words, dress professionally and conduct yourself as if you are in an agency setting with colleagues and supervisors. Be sure to maintain eye contact as if you were speaking in front of your colleagues. Finally, be sure to record yourself in a room that is quiet and where no one interrupts you.Your video presentation should include the following: In 1 to 2 sentences, identify and describe the presenting problem. In 1 to 2 sentences, briefly define and conceptualize the problem from a cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation. Formulate 2 assessment questions that you will ask the client to better understand the client’s problem. Remember, the assessment questions should be guided by cognitive-behavioral theory. In 1 to 2 sentences, identify two goals for treatment. Again, remember, the goals should be consistent with cognitive-behavioral theory. In 1 to 2 sentences, describe the treatment plan from a cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation. Remember, the treatment plan should align with the goal(s) for work. Discuss one outcome you would measure, if you were to evaluate whether the intervention worked, and explain how this is consistent with cognitive behavior theory. Evaluate one merit and one limitation of cognitive behavior theory as it relates to the case study. Evaluate the application of cognitive-behavioral theory in relation to a diversity issue pertinent to the case.Be sure to: Identify and correctly reference the case study you have chosen. Speak clearly Required ReadingsTurner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Chapter 4: Cognitive Behavior Theory and Social Work Treatment (pp. 54–79)Chapter 5: Cognitive Theory and Social Work Treatment (pp. 80–95)González-Prendes, A. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2009). Culturally sensitive treatment of anger in African American women: A single case study. Clinical Case Studies, 8(5), 383–402. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/1534650109345004Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.Graham, M. A., Sauerheber, J. D., & Britzman, M. J. (2013). Choice theory and family counseling: A pragmatic, culturally sensitive approach. Family Journal, 21(2), 230–234. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/1066480712466538Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.Document: Worksheet: Dissecting a Theory and Its Application to a Case Study (Word document)Document: Theory Into Practice: Four Social Work Case Studies (PDF)Required MediaSommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2014). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.psychotherapy.net.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/stream/waldenu/video?vid=277This week, watch the “Behavioral Therapy” and “Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy” segments by clicking the applicable links under the “Chapters” tab.Note: You will access this video from the Walden Library databases.Optional ResourcesGregory, V. L. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder: implications for clinical social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 36(5), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2010.510950Gregory, V. L. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for schizophrenia: applications to social work practice. Social Work in Mental Health, 8(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332980902791086Pössel, P., & Knopf, K. (2011). Bridging the gaps: An attempt to integrate three major cognitive depression models. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 35(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9325-z(Only read pp. 342–344)Hinton, D. E., & Pollack, M. H. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Anxiety disorders in cross-cultural perspective. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 15(3), 207–209. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00097.xRobey, P., Burdenski, T. K., Britzman, M., Crowell, J., & Cisse, G. S. (2011). Systemic applications of choice theory and reality therapy: An interview with Glasser Scholars. The Family Journal, 19(4), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480711415038

The post Assignment: Application of Cognitive Behavior Theory to a Case StudyAnswers 0Bids 75Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Master’s Level Preliminary Program and Stakeholder AnalysisAnswers 2Bids 41Other questions 10

/in /by

Write a 4–6 page preliminary program and stakeholder analysis for a human service program.Every government administration spends millions of dollars on social programs. Some are meaningful and successful; others are not. Program evaluation is a key activity for making programs effective and sustainable. All your assessments in this course will be based on one social program of your choice.SHOW LESSIt is important to bear in mind that programs do not exist without people; they serve people and are carried out by people, and beyond those directly involved, other people are mainly interested in program outcomes. Collectively, we call all these people ‘stakeholders.’ They bring a variety of interests, opinions, capacities, and functions that can impact programs in many ways. Program evaluators must win the cooperation of stakeholders to gather needed information and implement the evaluation process. And evaluators must take stakeholders’ interests into account so they will ‘buy in’ to the evaluation outcomes. Therefore, evaluators need to understand stakeholders and how to skillfully manage interpersonal dynamics throughout the evaluation process.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:Competency 2: Manage interpersonal dynamics of the program evaluation process.Analyze interests of stakeholders involved with an evaluation.Plan how to facilitate communication and collaboration with stakeholders.Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization.Comply with APA guidelines for style and formatting.In this assessment, you will be in the enviable position of choosing your own client—you will choose one social program on which all your assessments for this course will be based. In a later assessment, you will propose an evaluation for this program, but before you do, it is necessary to make a stakeholder analysis to determine who has interests in the program, what they desire for its outcomes, and any concerns they may have. This will help you, as the evaluator, to understand the audience for your proposal and how to best communicate with them.Preparation: Identify and Research Your ClientIdentify a human service program to work with in this course. All your course assessments will be based on one social program of your choice. Choose a program involved with issues such as unemployment, economic disadvantage, homelessness, adolescent pregnancy, infant mortality, crime, domestic violence, child abuse, substance abuse, mental illness, literacy, hunger, disease control, et cetera. It would be best to choose a program that is active in your own community. If you work with such a program, you may select it for your course work. Remember, you will be using this program for purposes of evaluation.Go to the Web site of the agency that administers the program to research basic information about it. Choose a program that discloses most required information. However, if some details cannot be found, for the purposes of assessments in this course it is permissible to infer plausible findings.Important note: While it is ethical to invent some information to complete these learning experiences, never do this for professional work or assessments that are supposed to be based on factual research.InstructionsTo successfully complete this assessment, write a 4–6 page program description and stakeholder analysis. This will be an internal planning document; its purpose is to gather information that you would share with other evaluators on your team.Program DescriptionDescribe the program of your choice and discuss why you selected this particular program. Answer the following:What population (or populations) does the program seek to serve?What is the general history of the program?What are the main goals of the program? What would be recognized as operational definitions of ‘success’ or ‘successful outcomes’ for the program? Analyze what the desired benefits of the program would be for each type of program participant.How could these outcomes be measured?What sorts of evaluative research could be undertaken to assess how well the program meets its goal?What other questions would you like to have answered about the program?Stakeholder AnalysisDescribe all program participants and other stakeholders. Think broadly to include all who could be involved at any level, including not only direct participants but also administrators and perhaps political authorities and others who would have a stake in program outcomes.What are their roles and functions?Detail how you would plan to facilitate communication and collaboration with them. (Readings in King and Stevahn’s 2013 book Interactive Evaluation Practice: Mastering the Interpersonal Dynamics of Program Evaluation are highly recommended for this.)Despite the fact that it is beyond the scope of this assessment to actually meet with program stakeholders, what do you think the answers to following would be for each of the stakeholders you identified? Please keep in mind that while it is expedient for you to imagine the answers to these questions for this exercise, in an actual program evaluation it would extremely important for you consult with the stakeholders to research the answers to these questions.Might there be any possible conflicts of interest among different types of stakeholders?What risks or unfavorable outcomes might they be concerned about?What are their desired outcomes from the program?On the basis of the answers that you arrived at, what interpersonal or political considerations should you take into account to assure your program evaluation would be effective and appreciated?Additional RequirementsYour assessment should meet the following requirements:Written communication: Written communication is well organized and free of errors that detract from the overall message.APA style: Comply with current APA style and formatting.Number of references: Minimum of three academic resources.Length: Submission includes 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to a cover page and references page.Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.

The post Master’s Level Preliminary Program and Stakeholder AnalysisAnswers 2Bids 41Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Reflection Paper Answers 2Bids 54Other questions 10

/in /by

Reflection Paper Topics with Grading Rubric    You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. Learning Objectives: Students  will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of  both personal and universal significance. Their writing should  demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically  coherent arguments.Assessment:Students  should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that  form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to  construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of  appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:The Frivolity of Evil  How and How Not to Love Mankind  What We Have to Lose  Roads to Serfdom  Then,  FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word  response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS:  1) What is the author’s main argument? 2) How does he support his main  argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or  disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least  two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to  your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers’ insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy  as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this  essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss,  analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that  the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have  prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.Note: I  only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully  address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the  instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content  with the grade they earned. Please use MLA format.Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:Grading Rubric:The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading. 1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material:  The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question,  has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct  interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The  essay shows evidence of the student’s independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one  sentence) quotations are used (comprising no more than 10% of the body  of the paper), when appropriate, to support the writer’s analysis, and  an explanation is offered for each quotation. The use of block quotations will result in a severe point deduction.95 points2.Essay has clear and coherent argument:  There is a clearly stated thesis, and support for this thesis in the  body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and  follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented  is persuasive. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated  into the analysis.95 points3.Essay fulfills assigned task:  The essay addresses the entire assigned question or topic, elaborating  on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in  anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses  and provides clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and  accurately defined. Each paragraph conveys a coherent, organized  thought. Short (one sentence) quotations are  occasionally used, when appropriate, to support the writer’s analysis,  and an explanation is offered for each quotation. No more than 10% of  paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations. 40 points4.Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing:  the writer shows that he or she is comfortable using philosophical  language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The structure of the  sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed. 40 points5.Essay is technically correct:  The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully proofread. The argument  is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does not mislead  the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice,  and punctuation.     30 points

The post Reflection Paper Answers 2Bids 54Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.