2. Write at least 200 words describing the results, how you learn best, and how you will modify your study techniques to fit your learning style.

/in /by

Review the results of your assessment using the explanation below.

2. Write at least 200 words describing the results, how you learn best, and how you will modify your study techniques to fit your learning style.

What do the results mean?  Barbara Soloman, Coordinator of Advising, First Year College, North Carolina State University explains:

· Active Learners: tend to retain and understand information best by doing something active with it like discussing or explaining it to others.  They enjoy group work.

· Reflective Learners: prefer to think about it quietly first.  They prefer to work alone.

· Sensing Learners: tend to like learning facts.  They are patient with details and good at memorizing things.  They are practical and careful.

· Intuitive Learners: prefer discovering possibilities and relationships.  They are good at grasping new concepts and are comfortable with abstractions and mathematical formulations.  They are innovative and creative.

· Visual Learners: remember best what they see–pictures, diagrams, flowcharts, timelines, films, and demonstrations.

· Verbal Learners: get more out of words–written and spoken explanations. Everyone learns more when information is presented both visually and verbally.

· Sequential Learners: tend to gain understanding in linear steps, with each step following logically from the previous one.  They follow logical steps when finding solutions.

· Global Learners: Global learners tend to learn in large jumps, absorbing material almost randomly without seeing connections, and then suddenly “getting it.”  They may be able to solve complex problems quickly or put things together in novel ways once they have grasped the big picture, but they may have difficulty explaining how they did it.

The post 2. Write at least 200 words describing the results, how you learn best, and how you will modify your study techniques to fit your learning style. appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the qualitative and quantitative research designs encountered so far in this course. For your literature review, you will select one design from each of the following categories.

/in /by

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the qualitative and quantitative research designs encountered so far in this course.

For your literature review, you will select one design from each of the following categories.

Category

1. Non-experimental

Designs – Descriptive Archival Observational Correlational Survey research

2. Quantitative experimental

Designs – Pretest-posttest control group, Posttest-only control group, Solomon four-group,

3. Qualitative

Designs- Ethnography, Phenomenology, Grounded theory, Narrative, Participatory action research (PAR)

4. Mixed methods

Designs – Explanatory, Exploratory, Triangulation, Parallel

Visit the Research Methods research guide in the Ashford University Library and search the databases for a minimum of one peer-reviewed journal article published within the last 10 years about each of the research designs you selected. The articles must not be research studies using the designs. Instead, they must be about how to conduct a study using the design. Examples of acceptable articles for this assignment are listed at the Suggested Articles tab in the Research Methods research guide.

In your paper, briefly outline the topic you selected for your Final Research Proposal in Week One and apply the scientific method by suggesting both a specific research question and a hypothesis for the topic. Evaluate your chosen peer-reviewed articles summarizing each and explaining how the research design described could be useful for designing original research on your topic. Compare and contrast the paradigms or worldviews inherent in the methodology associated with each research design. Apply professional standards and situate yourself as a researcher by identifying which of these approaches best fits with your worldview.

The Research Methods Literature Review

  • Must be four to six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least four peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

The post Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review the qualitative and quantitative research designs encountered so far in this course. For your literature review, you will select one design from each of the following categories. appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

I want a research paper about “Rational emotive behavior therapy” by Albert Ellis. I Have uploaded 2 articles, a section from Albert Ellis’s book, and a review about the book

/in /by

I want a research paper about “Rational emotive behavior therapy” by Albert Ellis. I Have uploaded 2 articles, a section from Albert Ellis’s book, and a review about the book. You have to use these sources along the paper and if you used another source please cite them. You have to talk about the REBT, what is it, how is it used and why some people criticize it.

Instructions:

· APA format

· It must be 5-7 pages

· Double spaced

· I want it by Tuesday at 6:00 pm.

· You have to use your own word

The post I want a research paper about “Rational emotive behavior therapy” by Albert Ellis. I Have uploaded 2 articles, a section from Albert Ellis’s book, and a review about the book appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Dig deeper and it’s quite possible that these files also contain answers to many other questions that are now being asked — or,

/in /by

ssence Magazine
February 2007

SPECIAL REPORT

The New York City AIDS Experiment
By Kristal Brent Zook, Photography by Nitin Vadukul

Inside New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services headquarters on
William Street in Manhattan, there is a vaulted room known to staffers as the
Bubble. Hundreds of records are housed there: fat file folders containing vital
information about each of the foster children, most of them African-American and
Latino, ages 6 months and younger, who were enrolled in experimental HIV/AIDS
clinical trials conducted from 1988 to 2001. The records, overflowing with
information about the well-being of the children, fill about 60 lateral file
cabinets.

Dig deeper and it’s quite possible that these files also contain answers to many
other questions that are now being asked — or,
in some cases, shouted angrily — by parents, children’s advocates, community
activists and local politicians: questions about whether  the experimental drugs
harmed the children and how, or if, some died as a result of the treatments. The
fact that some of the files were destroyed in a fire, ESSENCE learned, could mean
there is a possibility that many questions may never be answered.

Clinical Trials and Tribulations

In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, hundreds of children in New York City were
dying of AIDS. A total of 321 newborns were infected with HIV in 1990, the year the
virus soared among infants. Something had to be done. “We fought to get people of
color into clinical trials,” recalls Debra Fraser-Howze, founding president and CEO
of the National Black Leadership Commission on AIDS, the oldest agency addressing
AIDS in Black communities. “At that time they only had gay White men enrolled, and
activists rightfully argued for inclusion,” says Fraser-Howze, who now chairs an
advisory committee investigating the clinical trials. In response, some doctors,
aware that AZT for adults had just been approved, began testing foster children —
mostly from the poor communities of Harlem and the Bronx, where many of the children
were dying — in clinical trials during the early 1990’s.

Not everyone was happy with this arrangement. For years foster parents and
biological family members alleged that some children were being enrolled against
their will and without proper parental permission. Other families claimed they were
bullied into giving their children HIV drugs, and when parents no longer felt it was
safe to continue administering medicine, they stood to lose their children.
“Something seriously went wrong, well-intentioned though it may have been,” said New
York City Council Member Bill Perkins during public hearings held in 2005. “We can’t
duck it. We can’t sugarcoat it.” Sharman Stein, the director of communications for
the Administration for Children’s Services (formerly known as the Bureau of Child
Welfare), says: “This is an issue that took place almost 20 years ago, long before
the current administration was at ACS. We are doing our absolute best to address
these questions.”

The ACS initially said that only 76 children had taken part in the studies. That
number skyrocketed to 465, however, when neglected files were reportedly found in an
agency warehouse. In interviews with ESSENCE, Children’s Services officials
acknowledge the number of children now known to have been involved in trials has
climbed to 526.

The post Dig deeper and it’s quite possible that these files also contain answers to many other questions that are now being asked — or, appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.