Discuss more News channels from both sides. – Discuss newspapers from both sides.

The difference between media in The U.S and the Middle East. This research paper is for Media&War course. The topic should be very specific. Start of with an argument. The difference between News broadcasts and News coverage in the Middle East and the U.S. – the difference between CNN and AlJazeera. How they both had a strong come out during the Gulf war 1991, and how they both differ now in broadcasting news, to the Arab world, and the U.S. – the Media in the U.S does not show what happens to people in the Middle East, and Media in the Middle east only shows reports of victims and wars from the Arab point of view. – Discuss more News channels from both sides. – Discuss newspapers from both sides. – Discuss how the Internet gave the people from both sides to meet in the middle and discuss issues as people and not as government-supported news channels. – Give examples from modern and old wars that proves the difference.

What are some of the difficulties in balancing conservation and tourism? What strategies may be employed to achieve a better balance or lessen the negativities of an imbalance?

the difficulties in balancing conservation and tourism What are some of the difficulties in balancing conservation and tourism? What strategies may be employed to achieve a better balance or lessen the negativities of an imbalance? OPTION 1: What are some of the difficulties in balancing conservation and tourism? What strategies may be employed to achieve a better balance or lessen the negativities of an imbalance? In answering you should use a journal article or book chapter focussing on a case study of one of the following: 1.    A National Park 2.    A Zoo or Aquarium 3.    A Nature-based Tour ESSAY INSTRUCTIONS: 1.    NO APPENDIX all relevant material must be incorporated into the main body of the essay. 2.    Must use comprehensive Harvard in-text referencing. 3.    ALL in text references should include page numbers (eg Wood, 2006: 54 – clearly showing that the information was sourced from that page). This applies to all references, not just quotes. 4.    You should only reference what you have read. If you read about an IOC report in Allen, reference Allen – that’s what you read. 5.    Do not reference internet sites, magazines or newspapers. There are no exceptions. They can be used as background research, but are not to be referenced. 6.    Base your essay on academic sources, eg journal articles, books, chapters in books. Only reference these sources. 7.    There is a maximum of five sources per essay. Choose wisely what is worth including. Remember, no internet references, magazines or newspapers. 8.    Many journals are now online and it’s okay to use these. Don’t give the URL, use the title, volume and issue no etc. 9.    Communication skills are important. Proofread carefully. The standard of your expression will affect your mark. 10.    A completed statement of authorship must appear as the first page of your assignment. 11.    Essays are to be submitted in hard paper copy into the assignment box in the Donald Whitehead Building. 12.    Essays are to be stapled.  NO Plastic should be used. %    SILOs Assessed 40    All Grading Criteria and Feedback N less than 50    D 50-59%    C 60-69%    B 70-79%     A 80-100% Fulfilment of overall task intent    Essay instructions not followed. Failed to answer question. Did not use sources as instructed. Poor execution of what was required. Broadly completed but some parts are superficially treated, misunderstood or incomplete. Not all essay instructions followed    Sound conceptual development, problems encountered have been satisfactorily solved, resulting in well presented work Essay instructions followed adequately    Material presented is strongly linked to task; comprehension of task is high. Essay instructions followed in an appropriate manner    Excellent research and communication of sophisticated concepts. Essay instructions followed closely Use of sources    Essay instructions on sources not followed. Poor or very limited use of sources. Lack of evidence of research. Inadequate referencing. Plagiarism.    Generally accurate and appropriate; some incomplete, unsupported or inconsistent information. Requires greater effort at substantiation and wider research.    Well researched with good use of material. Most information is appropriate, consistent and supportive of the conclusions drawn. Sources of information acknowledged in an appropriate way.    Conclusions are fully supported by appropriate and well organised research. May be some minor omissions. Sources fully referenced.    Evidence of critical or thoughtful sorting and selection. Comprehensive and accurate. Conclusions fully supported by research. Analysis of theories, concepts and cases    Lack of analysis. Case selection does not fit subject or instructions. Analysis not logically organised and presented    Generally very limited application; some misunderstanding or quite superficial treatment.    Relevant concepts, etc. applied in a generally appropriate and thoughtful way. No major misunderstandings; logical connections between ideas; no serious omissions.    Critical or evaluative thinking about how concepts/theories are applied; little inaccuracy or misunderstanding.    Creative or reflective processing of theories; understanding of how and why they are used; critical and evaluative thinking Structure and organisation    Disorganised and difficult to follow.    Well enough structured to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic. Instances of irrelevance or confusion.    Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow. Introductory and concluding sections used effectively.    Ideas are sequenced in a logically satisfying way; connections between different themes or sections are well made.    Structure and sequence are used effectively to help integrate ideas or support logical argument. Soundly structured throughout. Language use    Poor in spelling, grammar, sentence construction and paragraphs. Difficult for the reader to follow and understand.    Clear enough to be understood; some confused or unclear expression. Overuse of long and poorly constructed sentences. Poor use of paragraphs. Spelling, punctuation & grammar generally satisfactory but need more attention. Lack of adequate proofreading    Language is generally sound and clear throughout. However, a range of isolated mistakes in spelling and grammar. Avoidable use of jargon.    Language use demonstrates precision and expressiveness as well as clarity.    Active, confident and precise use of language; mastery of style and tone; avoidance of use of business jargon

Explain the challanges that management need to consider when developing and managing traditional versus virtual team

Team work Team work is important in the workplace but team can be difficult to manage . Explain the challanges that management need to consider when developing and managing traditional versus virtual team. Team work is important in the workplace but team can be difficult to manage . Explain the challanges that management need to consider when developing and managing traditional versus virtual team. It needs to hav e at least 2 examples of when management can use virtual team based work as a strategy to achieve organisational goals. Hav e to refer to the following article and conduct research to find three other relev ant, must choose scholarly articles. Siebdrat, F., Hoegl, M., & Ernst, H. (2009). Howto manage virtual teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4),53-68. Retrieved from http://sloanreview.mit.edu. So totally will be 4 references. For the reference,rt must be Standard APA6th edition

Create an original 3-5 minute narrated power point presentation that describes how new media technology is being used as a tool to express or react to heartfelt political beliefs or concerns.

Technology and Political Thought Project description Technology and Political Thought Directions: Create an original 3-5 minute narrated power point presentation that describes how new media technology is being used as a tool to express or react to heartfelt political beliefs or concerns. When preparing your presentation think broadly about the possibilities. Consider the social and political context within which the technology is employed. Describe how a political perspective shapes the use of the technology and/or how the technology allows for the amplifying of political ideas or the suppression of political thought, as the case may be. Use the textbook (Ryan, Alan. On Politics: A History of Political Thought From Herodotus to the Present. Vols 1 & 2. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2012) to help you create and add theoretical depth to your presentation. Some examples of the nexus between politics and technology might include the role of social media in events such as Occupy Wall Street and the Arab Spring, WikiLeaks, Edward Snowden, NSA spying, online political fundraising, crowdsourcing, flash mobs, hackers/hacking, cyber warfare, mobile phone cameras, YouTube terrorist videos, surveillance, GPS devices, sonic projectors and directional audio technology, virtual reality, multimodal voting technology, video games, citizen journalism, etc. Although this will be a narrated power point presentation, please do not record your voice. On each slide write in the space provided what is to be spoken for the presentation and a voice will be added later. This presentation needs to contain accurate visual information, accurate oral information, and be accessible for viewing and listening. The presentation should be engaging and creative. This is to be original work, but based on research. So, you will need to cite your sources in a bibliography at the end of your presentation. If you use a publicly available image as part of your presentation, cite this along with your other research.