Offender Profiling and Criminal Inferences, law homework help Question description   Forensic psychology addresses scientific questions about criminal actions, where the understanding of the actions leads to inferences about offender characteristics. Canter (2000) introduced the radex of criminality, the combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects of a crime. In addition, these quantitative and qualitative characteristics are viewed through the prism of development and change over time. The radex can be applied to any criminal behavior. One of the most important investigative events of the last century was the creation of behavioral analysis units (BAUs) by the FBI. There are three BAUs. They are known not because of their ability to solve serial murders but because of their creation of a database, the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program (ViCAP), on which criminal justice professionals around the country and even the world have relied ever since. Offender character assessment is the derivation of inferences about a criminal from evidentiary and psychological aspects of the crimes he or she has committed. For this process to move beyond deduction based on personal opinion and supposition to an evidence-based science, a number of aspects of criminal activity need to be examined, analyzed, and categorized. The notion of a hierarchy of criminal differentiation is introduced to highlight the need to search for consistencies and variations at many levels of that hierarchy. However, current research indicates that the key distinctions are those that differentiate, within classes of crime, between offences and between offenders. This also leads to the hypothesis of a circular ordering of criminal actions, analogous to the color circle, a radex. The radex model, tested using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) procedures, allows specific hypotheses to be developed about important constituents of criminal differentiation: ·         Salience: MDS analyses reveal the importance of the frequency of criminal actions as the basis on which the significance of those actions can be established. ·         Models of differentiation: The research reviewed mainly supports distinctions between criminals in terms of the forms of their transactions with their explicit or implicit victims. ·         Consistency: Offenders have been shown to exhibit similar patterns of action on different occasions. The most reliable examples of this currently are in studies of the spatial behavior of criminals. ·         Inference: Under limited conditions, it is possible to show associations between the characteristics of offenders and the thematic focus of their crimes. In general, these results provide support for models of thematic consistency that link the dominant themes in an offender’s crimes to characteristic aspects of his or her lifestyle and offending history. We never analyze anything in isolation but compare new information to the existing knowledge about similar past and parallel events. Both psychological evaluations and crime investigations follow this pattern of determining what a criminal is and what a crime is. That is what the radex model addresses. INSTRUCTIONS In your main post: ·         Analyze the different components of the radex model of criminal differentiation, looking at expressive and instrumental criminal conduct against person and property on a continuum of increasing seriousness. ·         Include in your analysis a summary of the domains and a critique of how they can be or cannot be useful for forensic psychology and for criminal justice professionals. What are the limitations you see in relying on this approach?

LEG 107 Week 5 Midterm Exam Part 1 The intermediate appellate court for the federal court system is: The ADR process whereby a neutral third-party oversees a bargaining process between opposing parties, helping them identify issues of agreement that might lead to settlement, but does not decide the outcome is known as: Which is not a court of limited jurisdiction? U.S. district courts, circuit courts of appeals, and special federal courts are created by: The court may obtain jurisdiction over a defendant: This jurisdiction authorizes the court to hear and decides disputes involving property within its geographical borders. The following organization has no connection to paralegals and legal assistants: Which is considered a conflict of interest? Which of the following qualification-options are generally included in a paralegal definition: The NFPA’s certification exam is known as: Paralegals work in the following settings: Paralegal or legal assistant programs that want to be ABA approved must have at least the following number of semester hours, which includes general education and legal specialty courses: Procedural due process requires: One type of fully protected speech is: The school of jurisprudential thought that states the central concern of legal decision making is to promote market efficiency or the “bottom line” is: If a state statute conflicts with a provision in the U.S. Constitution: All of the following are constitutionally created branches of government except: The following type of speech is generally considered unprotected by the First Amendment: The following statement about the relationship between lawyer ethics rules and legal assistants is true: The following activities would be considered the unauthorized practice of law when done by paralegals or legal assistants: If a lawyer represents both the husband and wife who are seeking a divorce, that representation would implicate the: Which federal agency allows paralegals to represent others before it, without supervision? Paralegals who violate NFPA Model Rules may be punished by: The most important set of ethics rules that a paralegal needs to know is: Pro bono paralegals are those who: As evidenced by the sample in the text, a paralegal resume should be: The following is true of trust accounts: During a job interview, a paralegal should: In preparing for a job interview you should do all of the following, except: All of the following are recognized arrangements for law firms. Which can raise ethical concerns related to confidentiality?