Species and Scientific Correction

Week 1 Discussion “Species and Scientific Correction” Note:Online students, please respond to one (1)of the following three (3) bulleted options. Imagine you are explaining to a friend what the term species means. In your own words define the term species then provide three (3) examples of different species. Next determine three (3) ways that species within a genus are often related to one another. Furthermore, in your response briefly describe how the word “related” is being used when discussing species and genus. • Go to The Economist Website to read the article titled “Beetles and Bugs”, dated July 18, 2015, located here. Choose three (3) main points you found interesting in the article then summarize each of your chosen main points including in your summary connections made to the material covered in Chapter 1 of your textbook. Provide examples of the connections in your response. • Science is believed to be self-correcting. A 2010 article from Psychology Today entitled, “Why science is self-conducting”, argues that scientific misconduct is the rationale for science correction. View this article, which is found here then summarize the main points of the article you found most significant. Next in your response take a stance as to whether or not you believe that science is self-correcting. Be sure to provide support for your stance. Lastly, discuss three (3) reasons why you believe or do not believe that self-correcting science or disproven theories are good for science Justify your response.

Design a hypothetical experiment in which you take a neutral stimulus and condition a person or animal to respond to it.

Document Preview: 

Instructions and possible resources:
Design a hypothetical experiment in which you take a neutral stimulus and condition a person or animal to respond to it. You will be expected to write a lab report where you will discuss your approach, the principles you used, and make conclusions about how you successfully or not used conditioning principles. Please include the following in your lab report:
Question:  What are you trying to achieve? Make a person blink on cue.
Hypothesis: I predict that I can make a person blink at the sound of a doorbell.
Procedure:
The procedure for your classical conditioning experiment needs to be written in paragraph format.
Outline each step in the procedure.
You may use clip art if you’d like to illustrate your experiment.
Define all the terms used (e.g., CS, CR, UCS, UCR).
Assume that I do not know anything about the subject or the experiment.
Conclusion:
Provide a good summary of your experiment.
Include the potential results of the experiment:
Do you think your experiment will work?
What are some factors that can make your experiment a success?
Why do you think your experiment may fail?
Could your subject generalize their response?
Make sure to cite your sources using APA Style. 
Video Resources:
Classical Conditioning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5lCleK-PM&list=LPQpmQOm_ziJM&index=2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP5lCleK-PM&list=LPQpmQOm_ziJM&index=2
Classical Conditioning: Real World Examples https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypCSoVhAyhIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypCSoVhAyhI
Classical Conditioning: Extinction & Spontaneous Recovery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34MEA3whgnMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34MEA3whgnM
Your goal for this Classical Conditioning Experiment will be to develop a situation, and through the use of classical conditioning, attempt to produce a conditioned response

What other information do you think would need to be revealed by Lisa in her intake interview for her to fit the diagnosis for major depressive disorder? Discuss.

Document Preview: 

This assignment is due on the 16 January 2012 at 6am EST , each section must have a reference list and all must be written in word documents respecting the word count on each section . The similarity scores must also be less than 25%.
SECTION A ( 500 words document minimum and a refernce list at the end of this section . it should also have 25% less for the similarity scores.).
SCENARIO
Lisa is a 44-year-old woman who tried to kill herself by overdosing on medication she had in the house. After she was released from the local hospital, she was referred to a local community agency that provides counseling services. When Dr. Foster met with Lisa, he asked her why she wanted to harm herself. She said that she just feels like life is one big chore that seems to never end. Dr. Foster noted that the client came into the office looking very disheveled and looked as if she had not taken a shower in the past week. Dr. Foster asked Lisa if she found pleasure in any activities, and Lisa said she did at some point in her life but that she cannot even remember the last time when she was able to find pleasure in her life. Dr. Foster states that he believes that Lisa may fit the diagnosis for major depressive disorder. Dr. Foster would like your thoughts on Lisa’s case.
Write 500 words , Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:
What are the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder?
What other information do you think would need to be revealed by Lisa in her intake interview for her to fit the diagnosis for major depressive disorder? Discuss.
Are there any other psychiatric disorders that might be a better fit for Lisa? Discuss and provide a rationale for another diagnosis.
What type of treatment should you recommend for Lisa’s case? Discuss.
Lisa is at risk for suicidal behavior and ideations. What steps do you think should be taken to ensure her safety? 

Heredity is of biological significance and hence internal.

Heredity is of biological significance and hence internal.
Enviornment relates to external factors.
Personality traits and development in a person in psychology, is in relation to a persons reaction to the enviornment in which he grows. Subjecting his heredity traits to a certain external factors or influence, will determine the personality he develops eventually. But still two identical twins may behave differently even if remain in the same enviornment, which will be so because the worldly reactions could be different to both of them and both may have diffrent I Q applied to acertain situation and behave differently yet. Heredity- genes application to I Q is still a subjective issue. Heredity is constant subject to a person which is over with the birth. So how one uses his own I Q to react to his sitaution to either have a good , bad or avaerage personality is matter of individual choice to a far degree on relative levels. And Genetically, science has enough left to qualitatively measure personality traits vs genes, leave alone quantitatively. Hence in Psychology terms it is the reaction to the external factors that helps determining the personality issue, as heredity being a constant feature in an individual is a personality born feature and not developed feature or an issue.