How to better manage interdepartmental communication in respect to work place safety in trauma situations Tentative title: Interdepartmental communication in respect to work place safety in trauma situations.

LITERATURE REVIEW – Patient Experience Write a 6 page literature review of the following references. This needs to be done in APA format. The focus of the literature review needs to follow the following Research guidelines: Problem: There is very little communication when there is a violent patient or potentially violent patient being treated by clinicians across multiple departments in emergency medicine. Purpose: To manage improved communication techniques between departments in respect to work place safety in trauma situations. Research question: How to better manage interdepartmental communication in respect to work place safety in trauma situations Tentative title: Interdepartmental communication in respect to work place safety in trauma situations. (Ahmed, Burt, & Roland, 2014; Hogerzeil, Samson, Jaume Vidal, & Rahmani-Ocora, 2006; Kumar, Henseler, & Haukaas, 2009; Lewis, 2015; Nancy Mannion et al., 2017; Padgett, 2014; Robbins, 2014; Rosiek & Leksowski, 2013; Stuttaford et al., 2014) References Ahmed, F., Burt, J., & Roland, M. (2014). Measuring Patient Experience: Concepts and Methods. The Patient, 7(3), 235-241. Hogerzeil, H. V., Samson, M., Jaume Vidal, C., & Rahmani-Ocora, L. (2006). Is access to essential medicines as part of the fulfilment of the right to health enforceable through the courts? The Lancet, 368(9532), 305-311. Kumar, S., Henseler, A., & Haukaas, D. (2009). HIPAA’s effects on US healthcare. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 22(2), 183-197. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09526860910944665 Lewis, T. (2015). Healthcare Leaders Who Influence the Sustainability of High Patient Satisfaction Scores. (3721844 Ph.D.), The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://proxy.cecybrary.com/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1721470413?accountid=26967 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. Nancy Mannion, B., Bhattacharya, A., Edwards, C., Fasnacht, A., Mazzone, L., Stephens, K., . . . Swanson-Bierman, B. (2017). Impact of a Planned Workflow Change: Super Track Improves Quality and Service for Low-Acuity Patients at an Inner-City Hospital. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 43(2), 114-125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2016.03.029 Padgett, J. D. (2014). Patient Safety Culture and High Reliability Organizations. (3625714 D.B.A.), Walden University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://proxy.cecybrary.com/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1557705479?accountid=144789 ProQuest Central database. Robbins, B. G. (2014). On the Origins of Trust. (3641622 Ph.D.), University of Washington, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from https://proxy.cecybrary.com/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1622540352?accountid=26967 ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. Rosiek, A., & Leksowski, K. (2013). How the Practicing Physician Encounters Human Rights in Daily Clinical Situations. Health, Culture and Society, 4(1), 66-n/a. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.110 Stuttaford, M., Makhamreh, S. A., Coomans, F., Harrington, J., Himonga, C., & Hundt, G. L. (2014). The right to traditional, complementary, and alternative health care. Global Health Action, 7. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24121

Discuss two or more methods of stress management and provide theoretical explanations and research evidence to show their effectiveness.

Length: 1500 words (excluding reference list) Task: Write an essay: Stress is a normal part of people’s lives. Your first task in writing this essay, is to discuss life changes and or daily hassles as a source of stress. Use psychological theory and research evidence to explain this aspect of stress. Next, there are several methods used to manage the negative effects of stress. Methods used to manage stress can be biological or psychological. Discuss two or more methods of stress management and provide theoretical explanations and research evidence to show their effectiveness. Presentation: Use this essay template The assignment is to be formatted as per the APA (6th edition) style. You can use this template or you can format your own document using the details below. 2.54 cm (1 inch) margin on all sides. Flush left justification style (ragged right) (APA, 2009, p. 229). 1 cm indentation for new paragraphs Use Times New Roman with 12 pt. font size (APA, 2009, p. 229). Double space all text, titles, table notes, and figure captions (APA, 2009, p. 229). have a running head left justified in the header of each page with the words “Running head:” before the shortened title (APA, 2009, pp. 229-230) page numbers need to be right aligned in the header in-text citations and referencing list are to comply with the sixth edition of the APA Publication Manual. For details regarding the APA manuscript style see: Burton, L. J. (2018). An interactive approach to writing essays and research reports in psychology (4th ed.). Milton, QLD: Wiley. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. The electronic version is available via the CDU library – click here Websites that might be useful:

Write a 4–5-page assessment in which you apply theories and concepts about prejudice, stereotypes, and groups to different points

Write a 4–5-page assessment in which you apply theories and concepts about prejudice, stereotypes, and groups to different points related to these topics. Prejudice and stereotyping seem to be part of the human condition, and it is essential to examine how attitudes develop in order to change our behavior as individuals and as a society. Suggested Resources The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom. FMG VIDEOS Click the following links to view videos purchased through Films Media Group for use in this Capella course. Any distribution of video content or associated links is prohibited. Racial Stereotypes in the Media | Transcript. Prejudice: More than Black and White | Transcript. LIBRARY RESOURCES The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course. Note: Some of the articles are quite old and are included here because they are considered seminal works in the field. Aramovich, N. P. (2014). The effect of stereotype threat on group versus individual performance. Small Group Research, 45(2), 176–197. Brambilla, M., & Butz, D. A. (2013). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: Macro-level symbolic threat increases prejudice against gay men. Social Psychology, 44(5), 311–319. Carr, P. B., Dweck, C. S., & Pauker, K. (2012). “Prejudiced” behavior without prejudice? Beliefs about the malleability of prejudice affect interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 452–471. Dasgupta, N., DeSteno, D., Williams, L. A., & Hunsinger, M. (2009). Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice. Emotion, 9(4), 585–591. Fehr, J., Sassenberg, K., & Jonas, K. J. (2012). Willful stereotype control: The impact of internal motivation to respond without prejudice on the regulation of activated stereotypes. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 220(3), 180–186. Gallate, J., Wong, C., Ellwood, S., Chi, R., & Snyder, A. (2011). Noninvasive brain stimulation reduces prejudice scores on an implicit association test. Neuropsychology, 25(2), 185–192. Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168. Lehman, B. (2012). The impacts of friendship groups’ racial composition when perceptions of prejudice threaten students’ academic self-concept. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 411–425. Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587. Pearl, R. L., Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2012). Positive media portrayals of obese persons: Impact on attitudes and image preferences. Health Psychology, 31(6), 821–829. Scarabis, M., & Florack, A. (2008). How the motivation to make fair judgments influences memory for in- and out-group behavior. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse De Psychologie, 67(4), 241–248. Schlehofer, M. M., Casad, B. J., Bligh, M. C., & Grotto, A. R. (2011). Navigating public prejudices: The impact of media and attitudes on high-profile female political leaders. Sex Roles, 65(1–2), 69–82. Shier, M. L., Jones, M. E., & Graham, J. R. (2010). Perspectives of employed people experiencing homelessness of self and being homeless: Challenging socially constructed perceptions and stereotypes. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 37(4), 13–37. Reyna, C., Dobria, O., & Wetherell, G. (2013). The complexity and ambivalence of immigration attitudes: Ambivalent stereotypes predict conflicting attitudes toward immigration policies. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(3), 342–356. Ryan, C. S., & Bogart, L. M. (1997). Development of new group members’ in-group and out-group stereotypes: Changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 719–732. Wong, Y. J., Horn, A. J., & Chen, S. (2013). Perceived masculinity: The potential influence of race, racial essentialist beliefs, and stereotypes. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 452–464. Zafar, S., & Ross, E. C. (2014). Interreligious contact, attitudes, and stereotypes: A study of five religious groups in Canada. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement. Advance online publication. Von Sikorski, C., & Schierl, T. (2014). Attitudes in context: Media effects of salient contextual information on recipients’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(2), 70–80. Assessment Instructions Search for research articles on theories and concepts related to prejudice, stereotypes, and groups. For your assessment, apply at least one theory or concept to each of the following: Examine how attitudes and behaviors of a group can contribute to prejudice and stereotyping. Analyze how the portrayal of ethnic, cultural, or social groups by the media can influence social perception of those groups and perpetuate stereotypes. Provide specific examples of how a group has been portrayed in the media. Explain how membership in a group can influence social judgment. Analyze how subtle stereotyping in everyday language and cognitive dissonance can affect the ability to bring about social change. Provide specific examples. Describe the types of ethical considerations researchers should consider before conducting research on the hotly debated topics of prejudice and stereotyping. What are the implications and likely consequences for society if prejudice and stereotyping are not reduced? Your submitted assessment should be 4–5 pages in length, excluding title page and reference page. Support your statements and analyses with references to at least three scholarly research articles. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for format and style. Additional Requirements Include a title page and reference page. At least three current scholarly or professional resources. APA format. Times New Roman font, 12 point. Double spaced. Social Judgment Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Examine how attitudes and behaviors of a group influence prejudice and stereotyping.    Does not describe how attitudes and behaviors of a group influence prejudice and stereotyping. Describes how attitudes and behaviors of a group influence prejudice and stereotyping. Examines how attitudes and behaviors of a group influence prejudice and stereotyping. Examines how attitudes and behaviors of a group influence prejudice and stereotyping and provides specific, relevant examples. Analyze how portrayal of ethnic, cultural, and social groups by the media influences social perception of the group and perpetuates stereotyping.    Does not explain how portrayal of ethnic, cultural, and social groups by the media influences social perception of the group and perpetuates stereotyping. Explains but does not analyze how portrayal of ethnic, cultural, and social groups by the media influences social perception of the group and perpetuates stereotyping. Analyzes how portrayal of ethnic, cultural, and social groups by the media influences social perception of the group and perpetuates stereotyping. Analyzes how portrayal of ethnic, cultural, and social groups by the media influences social perception of the group and perpetuates stereotyping; provides relevant, real-world examples. Explain how membership in a group influences social judgment.    Does not explain how membership in a group influences social judgment. Explains how membership in a group influences social judgment but does not tie explanation to theory or concept. Explains how membership in a group influences social judgment. Analyzes how membership in a group influences social judgment. Analyze how subtle stereotyping and cognitive dissonance can affect the ability to bring about social change.    Does not describe how subtle stereotyping and cognitive dissonance can affect the ability to bring about social change. Describes but does not analyze how subtle stereotyping and cognitive dissonance can affect the ability to bring about social change. Analyzes how subtle stereotyping and cognitive dissonance can affect the ability to bring about social change. Analyzes how subtle stereotyping and cognitive dissonance can affect the ability to bring about social change; suggests strategies to recognize and reduce subtle stereotyping and cognitive dissonance. Describe ethical challenges researchers face when conducting research on controversial topics.    Does not describe ethical challenges researchers face when conducting research on controversial topics. Describes ethical challenges researchers face when conducting research on controversial topics but does not clarify how the challenges are ethical in nature. Describes ethical challenges researchers face when conducting research on controversial topics. Describes ethical challenges researchers face when conducting research on controversial topics and considers the implications for the field of psychology of not addressing the ethical challenges. Examine the implications and consequences for society of not addressing prejudice and stereotyping.    Does not describe the implications and consequences for society of not addressing prejudice and stereotyping. Describes the implications and consequences for society of not addressing prejudice and stereotyping. Examines the implications and consequences for society of not addressing prejudice and stereotyping. Examines the implications and consequences for society of not addressing prejudice and stereotyping; recommends strategies for change. Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.    Writing does not support a central idea. Does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional. Writing supports an idea but is inconsistent and contains major errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writing coherently supports a central idea with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writing is coherent, using evidence to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional. Use APA format and style.  

Analyze the different components of the radex model of criminal differentiation, looking at expressive and instrumental criminal conduct against person and property on a continuum of increasing seriousness.

Offender Profiling and Criminal Inferences, law homework help Question description   Forensic psychology addresses scientific questions about criminal actions, where the understanding of the actions leads to inferences about offender characteristics. Canter (2000) introduced the radex of criminality, the combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects of a crime. In addition, these quantitative and qualitative characteristics are viewed through the prism of development and change over time. The radex can be applied to any criminal behavior. One of the most important investigative events of the last century was the creation of behavioral analysis units (BAUs) by the FBI. There are three BAUs. They are known not because of their ability to solve serial murders but because of their creation of a database, the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program (ViCAP), on which criminal justice professionals around the country and even the world have relied ever since. Offender character assessment is the derivation of inferences about a criminal from evidentiary and psychological aspects of the crimes he or she has committed. For this process to move beyond deduction based on personal opinion and supposition to an evidence-based science, a number of aspects of criminal activity need to be examined, analyzed, and categorized. The notion of a hierarchy of criminal differentiation is introduced to highlight the need to search for consistencies and variations at many levels of that hierarchy. However, current research indicates that the key distinctions are those that differentiate, within classes of crime, between offences and between offenders. This also leads to the hypothesis of a circular ordering of criminal actions, analogous to the color circle, a radex. The radex model, tested using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) procedures, allows specific hypotheses to be developed about important constituents of criminal differentiation: ·         Salience: MDS analyses reveal the importance of the frequency of criminal actions as the basis on which the significance of those actions can be established. ·         Models of differentiation: The research reviewed mainly supports distinctions between criminals in terms of the forms of their transactions with their explicit or implicit victims. ·         Consistency: Offenders have been shown to exhibit similar patterns of action on different occasions. The most reliable examples of this currently are in studies of the spatial behavior of criminals. ·         Inference: Under limited conditions, it is possible to show associations between the characteristics of offenders and the thematic focus of their crimes. In general, these results provide support for models of thematic consistency that link the dominant themes in an offender’s crimes to characteristic aspects of his or her lifestyle and offending history. We never analyze anything in isolation but compare new information to the existing knowledge about similar past and parallel events. Both psychological evaluations and crime investigations follow this pattern of determining what a criminal is and what a crime is. That is what the radex model addresses. INSTRUCTIONS In your main post: ·         Analyze the different components of the radex model of criminal differentiation, looking at expressive and instrumental criminal conduct against person and property on a continuum of increasing seriousness. ·         Include in your analysis a summary of the domains and a critique of how they can be or cannot be useful for forensic psychology and for criminal justice professionals. What are the limitations you see in relying on this approach?