Most people perceive international public administration to be a set

/in /by

Most people perceive international public administration to be a set of state structures, institutions, and processes. Opponents of globalization argue that it weakens states, making it difficult for them to sustain social welfare and environmental policies, and create fiscal redistributive initiatives.

According to James Bovard, a libertarian author who focuses on writing about government, proponents and businesses seeking to expand a broad claim there is little or no evidence of national governments’ decline. Congress, along with many policy strategists, seem to think that whatever the effects of globalization on governments, they are likely to be beneficial for long-term economic growth (Bovard, 1987).

Analyze the claims laid out in this controversy, and try to argue the strongest case you can in favor of the view(s) you find most convincing. In doing so, be sure to seriously consider the case that your opponents might make against your position, and why you would reject it. Use the Internet and / or Strayer databases to research evidence that supports your opinion. Determine your point of view on the issue, and support your position with information from at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years.

Create a PowerPoint presentation that covers the following:

  • Provide a brief description of the issue.
  • Present evidence that supports both sides of the argument.
  • In the note section of each information slide, you must write a narrative of what you would
  • Provide at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years at the end of your video.

Note: Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Your presentation should include a minimum total of 12 slides:

  • 10 information slides
  • Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
    1. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
    2. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
    3. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze the core controversies, theories, and rationale surrounding global public
  • Formulate domestic and international public policy alternatives and arguments.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in international public administration.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH homework handlers TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper

The post Most people perceive international public administration to be a set appeared first on homework handlers .

Case Study on Operational Strategy for an IT Organization:

/in /by

Case Study on Operational Strategy for an IT Organization:

You are in IT management/leadership team in a medium size IT organization and are responsible for three engineering teams. Your teams are implementing about 15-20 projects per year for the company, and also provide support and maintenance of current systems. While your teams have been successful in project delivery overall, you have to constantly shift people from project to project to meet multiple competing timelines, the engineers are overworked and stressed, and any small delay or problem impacts multiple project deliveries. Your engineers are also reminding you that some of the core technologies your systems are built on are getting old and will need upgrades or completely different technical approaches. Their preliminary analysis also shows that upgrading or replacing core technologies will result in the need to re-engineer some of your existing systems, so that teams can better support current and future projects as well as take advantage of the new technologies. A new CIO has recently joined your company and has assembled a committee to determine and prioritize the necessary changes in IT processes, technologies, and approaches to project delivery. You have been invited to participate in this committee to provide your and your teams’ perspectives as input to upcoming operational strategy changes.

As you reflect on the day-to-day issues your teams are facing, you note the following trends:

• People – your employee staff is relatively small compared to the number of people needed to staff all projects and other IT activities your teams are responsible for. When you have requested additional employee positions, you were told that the company does not want to expand IT organization at this point. There is a budget associated with each project, so you can use this budget to hire contracting resources. You are asked to keep costs down, so you have to think of creative ways to staff projects quickly and with qualified people, while reducing costs. You are concerned that the system and technology knowledge may be lost when contractors leave. You can also see the strain on your employees, who are tasked with overseeing contractors, facilitating knowledge transfer and ensuring the projects remain high quality and with on-time delivery despite the changing staff members.

• Project delivery – your company has a thorough process of selecting projects for IT implementation based on business priorities. Selected projects go through multiple reviews of technical and architecture approaches and a detailed budgeting process before they are approved for implementation. While you value the diligent governance for IT project delivery, you are also concerned that many of the projects end up with a very short implementation timeline due to the long initial selection/ideation/budgeting/approval process. Your teams are often faced with delivering projects on very compressed schedules, resulting in cuts to time spent testing, stressed team members, and some functionality being delivered in later releases.

• Core technology upgrades – while your teams are busy on project implementation and deliveries, technology frameworks that your systems are built on seem to be aging quickly. You have been setting aside some budget and engineering time every year to upgrade or replace one or two of the multitude core technologies powering your systems. These technology improvements seem to always take longer than you expect, impact a lot of the systems, require some changes and lots of retesting. In some cases, there is no choice but to upgrade, as vendors announce plans to retire your versions of their products. In other cases, you have some flexibility on the timing of the upgrade, and wonder about the relative costs of upgrading vs. falling behind on the technology curve. Your engineers bring up various opportunities and advantages of switching to new technologies or the latest versions of the vendor products. You are wondering how you can balance the cost and impact of continuous technology changes with the need to deliver new

projects and maintain/enhance current systems.

Your Challenge:

What changes in the current operational strategy can you propose to the new CIO, as your input to operational strategy committee? Please address the following topics in your response:

• Provide a summary of the challenges of the current operational process. Describe the current and expected long-term impact of these challenges if they are not addressed.

• For each challenge, provide three alternative strategies to address the challenge – aggressive, balanced, and moderate.

o An aggressive strategy can be a major change to the current processes and ways of operating. It may also have major impacts on the organization in terms of restructuring, changing people roles/responsibilities, major changes to how work is done, or major cost impacts.

o A balanced strategy may be an introduction of some changes to the current processes and operating strategy, with less impact and disruption compared to an aggressive strategy. It may also be a phased introduction of the some or all elements of the aggressive strategy.

o A moderate strategy may have some incremental changes to the current processes and operating strategy, while leaving most of the current way of operating as is. A moderate strategy aims to minimize changes and disruptions, while introducing gradual improvements.

• Provide your recommendation of the preferred strategy for each challenge. Explain why the selected strategy is preferred in each case, and provide the next steps to plan for or introduce the new strategy.

o Please consider the overall impact of your recommendations for the organization – if you are recommending aggressive strategy changes in all areas, there will be major changes in the work processes, with higher improvement potential. If all recommendations are moderate, the changes will be minimized, but the positive impact may not be sufficient. What is the right combination? How well is your company prepared to deal with

recommended changes?

Create your response to this challenge as a proposal you will submit to operational strategy committee. Format your response as an APA paper and include a bibliography with references/sources you have consulted in preparing your proposal.

No plagiarism and should be below 20%. 

You will conduct a series of short, evaluative critiques of film, philosophy, literature, music, and myth.

/in /by

Competency

Formulate, express, and support individual perspectives on diverse works and issues.

Instructions

You will act as a critic for some of the main subjects covered in the humanities. You will conduct a series of short, evaluative critiques of film, philosophy, literature, music, and myth. You will respond to five different prompts, and each response should include an analysis of the topics using terminology unique to that subject area and should include an evaluation as to why the topic stands the test of time. The five prompts are as follows:

  1. Choose a film and offer an analysis of why it is an important film, and discuss it in terms of film as art. Your response should be more than a summary of the film.
  2. Imagine you had known Plato and Aristotle and you had a conversation about how we fall in love. Provide an overview of how Plato would explain falling in love, and then provide an overview of how Aristotle might explain falling in love.
  3. Compare and contrast the two poems below:

LOVE’S INCONSISTENCY

I find no peace, and all my war is done;
  I fear and hope, I burn and freeze likewise
  I fly above the wind, yet cannot rise;
  And nought I have, yet all the world I seize on;
  That looseth, nor locketh, holdeth me in prison, And holds me not, yet can I ’scape no wise;
  Nor lets me live, nor die, at my devise,
  And yet of death it giveth none occasion.
  Without eyes I see, and without tongue I plain;
  I wish to perish, yet I ask for health;
  I love another, and yet I hate myself;
  I feed in sorrow, and laugh in all my pain;
  Lo, thus displeaseth me both death and life,
  And my delight is causer of my grief.
 

 Petrarch

After great pain a formal feeling comes—
  The nerves sit ceremonious like tombs;
  The stiff Heart questions—was it He that bore?
  And yesterday—or centuries before?

The feet mechanical go round
  A wooden way
  Of ground or air or ought
  Regardless grown,
  A quartz contentment like a stone.

This is the hour of lead
  Remembered if outlived
  As freezing persons recollect
  The snow—
  First chill, then stupor, then
  The letting go

Emily Dickinson

  1. Compare and contrast these two pieces of music:

    Beethoven’s Violin Romance No. 2
    Scott Joplin’s Maple Leaf Rag 
  2. Explain in classical terms why a modern character is a hero. Choose from either Luke Skywalker, Indiana Jones, Bilbo Baggins, Harry Potter, Katniss Everdeen, or Ender Wiggins.

Ethics and Social Responsibility

/in /by

Ethics and Social Responsibility Grading Guide

Refer to the Week 2 – Required Learning Activity: Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, Ch. 13: Corporate Governance and Ethics

Purpose of Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to help students understand the influence that ethics and social responsibilities have on the strategic planning process.

Assignment Steps

Write a 700-word report in which you address the following:

  • Define and explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan while considering stakeholder needs and agendas.
  • Include at least one example of a company overstepping ethical boundaries for stakeholder agendas, and identify what types of preventative measures could be taken to avoid this type of situation.

Cite 3 scholarly references, including at least one peer-reviewed reference from the University Library.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.