How may the findings be used by FDA in further reviewing its Safe Medical Devices Act and in further improving the effectiveness of the implementation of the corresponding policies, procedures, and processes?

Integrating theory and research needs assessment

The Safety Medical Devices Act of 1990 was enacted by Congress to
increase the amount of information the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and
suppliers receive from users on malfunctions, adverse events, and critical
problems with medical devices. Despite the regulation enacted, studies show
that there has been widespread underreporting of such events. FDA reports
explicitly noted that less than 1% of device problems occurring in hospitals
have been brought to their attention.

It was further
found that the more serious the problem with the device, the less likely that
it is reported. This indicates a large number of hospitals and other medical
units have been advertently withholding such very significant information to
proper government authorities. This could have been made because of fears that
their hospitals may suffer the consequences, but to the detriment of the
patients and the public.

The effects of
withholding critical information will have adverse effects in the short and
long terms. Suppliers may continue producing and gaining profits out of
products and services that have been causing death and injuries to innocent
people.Hospitals with sub-standard
medical devices handled and operated by medical personnel and practitioners
with sub-standard knowledge, skills, and competencies would continue to exist
and gain profit, but at the same time continue destroying the lives and quality
of family life of many.

Medical errors,
also called “adverse events,” include missed and delayed diagnoses, mistakes
during treatment, medication mistakes, delayed reporting of results,
miscommunications during transfers and transitions in care, inadequate
postoperative care, and mistaken identity. Patient safety also encompasses the
concept of “reliability.” Reliability in health care is defined as patients
getting the intended tests, medications, information, and procedures at the
appropriate time and in accordance with their values and preferences.
System-derived errors can occur when clinicians are tired after working long
hours, stressed or cutting corners because they are in a hurry. Environmental
factors like noise and lighting can distract clinicians. Mistakes also can be
made because of a lack of standardized equipment and practices. For example, it
is easy to understand how a patient can be administered the wrong medication if
two different medicine vials look the same and the doctor is in a hurry when
grabbing a medication. Providing clearly labeled, color-coded bottles or
storing similar-looking vials in separate locations can help prevent mistakes
like these from recurring (Patrick et al, 2008).

Research problem

This research
project intends to determine the degree of compliance of the Patton – Fuller Community
Hospital with the Safe
Medical Devices and policies and procedures in ensuring the safety of medical
devices used.

The
research questions are

1.What are the basic
medical reporting requirements, policies, and procedures imposed by FDA on
hospitals along the following?

Suspected medical device –related deaths

Medical device – related serious injuries

Other medical device-related adverse events

2.What have been the
experiences of the hospital/s in relation to: suspected medical device-related
deaths, medical device –related injuries, and other medical device-related
adverse events, and how were these addressed?

3.How may the
existing adverse – event reporting system of Patton – Fuller Community
Hospital be described
along the aforementioned variables (Robbins & Coulter, 2002).

4.To what extent has
the hospital been complying to the policies and procedures imposed by the FDA
in accordance with:

1Medical Device Act
of 1990,

2Medical devices
amendments of 1992, and

3State-specific
requirements?

5.How may the
findings be used by FDA in further reviewing its Safe Medical Devices Act and
in further improving the effectiveness of the implementation of the
corresponding policies, procedures, and processes?

Realistically, what are some things you could change about your current lifestyle reach a more optimal level of well-being?

PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE LAB PAPER (10 pts.)

Each student will participate in testing provided by the Physical Performance Program at CSUF.  The assessment includes coronary heart disease risk factor analysis, a physical fitness evaluation, which includes estimated maximal oxygen uptake, blood pressure, body composition, flexibility, muscular strength, and pulmonary function.  Students will use the information to evaluate and make recommendations for personal health improvement in these areas.

STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY:  You are responsible for scheduling your appointment with the Exercise Physiology Lab (KHS-004) based upon your schedule.  If you did not sign up during class timesign-up sheets will be posted outside the door of KHS-004.  Please make a point to sign up as soon as possible and make sure to keep your appointment.  Since approximately 450 students are tested each semester, it is imperative that your appointments are scheduled early and kept.  Appointments are at no charge, but there may be a charge for rescheduling missed appointments. 

Lab reports are confidential and a personal physical performance report will be handed or given to the student anywhere from 1 – 4 weeks after completing the physical assessment.

STUDENT REPORT:  Using the results from your personal performance report from the physical performance lab, each student is required to do a minimum of a 3 – 3 ½page paper.  Your papers will be typed, double-spaced, 12 pt. font, Times New Roman, black ink only, and stapled together.  Make sure yours papers are free of grammatical and spelling errors —- you will be graded on this.  You will also submit your personal physical performance report, stapled to your paper.  Your paper will cover each of the questions listed below in paragraph form:

  1. According to the results, what are the positive aspects of your assessment?
  1. According to the results, what are the negative aspects of your assessment?
  1. What are some things that you might need to improve upon?
  1. How does your current lifestyle contribute to the results you received?
  1. Realistically, what are some things you could change about your current lifestyle   reach a more optimal level of well-being?

Tracking explicit and implicit long-lasting traces of fearful memories in humans

Tracking explicit and implicit long-lasting traces of fearful memories
in humans
Pau Alexander Packard a,b,⇑
, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells a,b,c
, Lilian Milnitsky Stein d
, Berta Nicolás a
,
Lluís Fuentemilla a,b
a Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
bDepartment of Basic Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
c Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
d Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
article infoclick here for more information on this paper
Article history:
Received 17 April 2014
Revised 12 September 2014
Accepted 15 September 2014
Available online 26 September 2014
Keywords:
Explicit memory
Implicit memory
Psychophysiology
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Contextual fear
Gist-based memory
abstract
Recent accounts of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) suggest that the encoding of an episode within a
fearful context generates different implicit and explicit memory representations. Whilst implicit memory
traces include the associated emotional states, explicit traces include a recoding into an abstract or gistbased
structural context of the episode. Theoretically, the long-term preservation of implicit memory
traces may facilitate the often untreatable memory intrusions in PTSD. Here, we tracked in two experiments
how implicit and explicit memory traces for fearful episodes dissociate and evolve over time. Subjects
(N = 86) were presented with semantically-related word-lists in a contextual fear paradigm and
tested for explicit memories either immediately (i.e., 30 min) or after a delay (i.e., 1 or 2 weeks) with a
verbal recognition task. Skin Conductance Response (SCR) was used to assess implicit memory responses.
Subjects showed high memory accuracy for words when tested immediately after encoding. At test,
SCR was higher during the presentation of verbatim but not gist-based words encoded in a fearful context,
and remained unchanged after 2 weeks, despite subjects being unaware of words’ encoding context.
We found no clear evidence of accurate explicit memory traces for the fearful or neutral contexts of
words presented during encoding, either 30 min or 2 weeks afterwards. These findings indicate that
the implicit, but not the explicit, memory trace of a fearful context of an episode can be detected at
long-term through SCR and is dissociated from the gist-based memory. They may have implications
towards the understanding of how the processing of fearful memories could lead to PTSD.

Identify the ethical dilemmas that juvenile psychopathy presents.

CHAPTER 7
CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATHY
Learning Objectives

After reading the chapter, students should be able to:
Present a special type of offender (the criminal psychopath) who is different emotionally, cognitively, and behaviorally from other offenders.
Describe the various measures of psychopathy.
Explain the neurobiological aspects of psychopathy.
Discuss the evidence for juvenile psychopathy.
Identify the ethical dilemmas that juvenile psychopathy presents.

Chapter Overview

The primary psychopath, a clinical designation attributed to psychologist Robert Hare, demonstrates a variety of behavioral and neurophysiological characteristics that differentiates him or her from other groups of individuals. Psychopaths most often function in society as charming, daring, witty, intelligent individuals, high on charisma but low on emotional reaction and affect. They appear to lack moral standards or to manifest genuine sensitivity toward others. Primary psychopaths should be distinguished from people who are psychotic, neurotic, or emotionally disturbed. They also should be distinguished from sociopaths, who are similar in many ways, as well as from individuals with an antisocial personality disorder. As noted in the chapter, though, psychopathy and APD have become almost indistinguishable in much of the literature. Hare has proposed the term criminal psychopath to describe those psychopaths who persistently and repetitively violate the law. In this sense, the criminal psychopath, the sociopath, and the individual with an antisocial personality disorder are similar in their offending patterns.
Neurophysiological research suggests that psychopaths are different from the rest of the population on a number of physiological measures. They seem to be underaroused, both autonomically and cortically, a finding that may account for their difficulty in learning the rules of society. There is some evidence to suggest that with adequate incentives, psychopaths may learn societal expectations very well, but for the most part the treatment research in this area is quite pessimistic.
Contemporary researchers have devised a large number of psychological measures to assess the presence of psychopathy in specific populations. In addition, current research has focused on juvenile psychopathy and, to a lesser extent, on gender differences in psychopathy. Studies of the psychopath’s childhood indicate commonalities that suggest it can be identified early. However, the topic of juvenile psychopathy is extremely controversial. Some researchers believe the construct does not exist, others believe it is inappropriately measured, and many if not most are concerned about the effects of attaching a pessimistic label to juveniles. Research on female psychopaths suggests that male and female psychopaths do not differ significantly on behavioral characteristics, though there is slightly more emphasis among females on sexual acting-out behavior. This probably reflects a cultural bias, however, since women have been traditionally chastised more than men for behavior deemed inappropriate according to sexual mores.
It should be noted that students are often so fascinated with the construct of psychopathy that they tend to see psychopaths everywhere around them. Likewise, estimates of psychopathy, even in incarcerated populations, should be made very guardedly. A major objective of the chapter is to present psychopathy as a neurologically-based clinical construct, characteristic of a very small percentage of the population, and one that continues to attract considerable research attention.
Chapter Outline and Key Concepts

What is a Psychopath?

Hare’s distinctions
Primary psychopath
The “true” psychopath
Secondary psychopath
Emotional problems, inner conflicts
Dissocial psychopath—
Earned antisocial behavior
Antisocial personality disorder (APD)
Distinct but very similar

An Example of a Psychopath

Demara, the “great impostor”
No violent crime, though many psychopaths do commit them

Behavioral Descriptions
Research by Quay, Cleckley, Hare
Charming and verbally fluent

Psychopaths and mental disorders
Not mentally disordered by traditional standard
Psychological testing differences; score high
Psychopaths and suicide

Other principal traits
Flat emotional reactions, inability to give affection, superficial emotions,
disregard for truth
Alcohol, even in small amounts, prompts vulgarity, loud and boisterous behavior
Cardinal trait is lack of remorse or guilt, semantic aphasia
Excessive use of instrumental aggression
If criminal, typically impulsive acts

Disagreement regarding mental disorder
Neuropsychological need for stimulation
The Criminal Psychopath
Psychopaths who demonstrate wide range of persistent and serious behavior
Prevalence
Offending patterns
Dispassionate violence
Sex crimes of psychopaths more brutal, sadistic than other sex offenders
Serial murderers with psychopathic features: brutal and sadistic
More likely than other murderers to kill strangers

Psychological Measures of Psychopathy
Psychopathy Checklist (PCL)
Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV)
Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV)
P-Scan: Research Version

Core factors of Psychopathy
Factor analysis
Two behavioral dimensions, possibly three
Factor 1
Interpersonal and emotional components
Factor 2
Socially deviant lifestyle
The three factor position
Cooke and Michie
The four dimensions position
Antisocial behavior

Recidivism